Council Decision of 26 April 2004 amending Articles 51 and 54 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice (2004/407/EC, Euratom)
Grade B
mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.
Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/decision/2004/407@2004-04-26/en
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 245 thereof,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 160 thereof,
Having regard to the request of the Court of Justice of 12 February 2003,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament of 10 February 2004,
Having regard to the opinion of the Commission of 10 November 2003,
Whereas:
(1) Point (31) of Article 2 of the Treaty of Nice replaces Article 225 of the EC Treaty by a new provision of which the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 provides: The Court of First Instance shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine at first instance actions or proceedings referred to in Articles 230, 232, 235, 236 and 238, with the exception of those assigned to a judicial panel and those reserved in the Statute for the Court of Justice. The Statute may provide for the Court of First Instance to have jurisdiction for other classes of action or proceeding..
(2) Article 3(13) of the Treaty of Nice made a similar amendment to the EAEC Treaty.
(3) Account was taken of that amendment in the provisional draft of Article 51 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice under which: By way of exception to the rule laid down in Article 225(1) of the EC Treaty and Article 140a(1) of the EAEC Treaty, the Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction in actions brought by the Member States, the institutions of the Communities and the European Central Bank..
(4) In accordance with the letter and general scheme of the new Article 225 of the EC Treaty and of the new Article 140a of the EAEC Treaty, it is necessary to redraft Article 51 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice in order to define the respective jurisdictions of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance, since the transfer of jurisdiction at first instance to the Court of First Instance has to be significant and the criteria for allocation of jurisdiction sufficiently clear to be understood unequivocally by the institutions and the Member States.
(5) Actions brought by the Member States against acts of the Council by which it exercises implementing powers in accordance with the rules referred to in the third indent of Article 202 of the EC Treaty should fall within the jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance. These are cases where the Council has either reserved the right to exercise implementing powers or has regained the right to exercise such powers in the course of a committee procedure.
(6) The provisions of Article 54 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice concerning the circumstances in which the Court of First Instance may decline jurisdiction in favour of the Court of Justice should be amended so as to accord with the new powers of the Court of First Instance. It is necessary to allow for jurisdiction to be declined where related cases are brought before the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance in which the outcome of one of them may depend on that of the other,
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Article 1
1. Article 51 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice shall be replaced by the following: .
Article 1
1.
Article 51
By way of derogation from the rule laid down in Article 225(1) of the EC Treaty and Article 140a(1) of the EAEC Treaty, jurisdiction shall be reserved to the Court of Justice in the actions referred to in Articles 230 and 232 of the EC Treaty and Articles 146 and 148 of the EAEC Treaty when they are brought by a Member State against: Jurisdiction shall also be reserved to the Court of Justice in the actions referred to in the same Articles when they are brought by an institution of the Communities or by the European Central Bank against an act of or failure to act by the European Parliament, the Council, both those institutions acting jointly, or the Commission, or brought by an institution of the Communities against an act of or failure to act by the European Central Bank.
(a) an act of or failure to act by the European Parliament or the Council, or by both those institutions acting jointly, except for:
decisions taken by the Council under the third subparagraph of Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty;
acts of the Council adopted pursuant to a Council regulation concerning measures to protect trade within the meaning of Article 133 of the EC Treaty;
acts of the Council by which the Council exercises implementing powers in accordance with the third indent of Article 202 of the EC Treaty;
(b) against an act of or failure to act by the Commission under Article 11a of the EC Treaty.
Article 1
2. the third paragraph of Article 54 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice shall be replaced by the following: Where the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance are seised of cases in which the same relief is sought, the same issue of interpretation is raised or the validity of the same act is called in question, the Court of First Instance may, after hearing the parties, stay the proceedings before it until such time as the Court of Justice has delivered judgment. In the same circumstances, the Court of Justice may also decide to stay the proceedings before it; in that event, the proceedings before the Court of First Instance shall continue. .
3. the following new paragraph shall be added to Article 54 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice: Where a Member State and an institution of the Communities are challenging the same act, the Court of First Instance shall decline jurisdiction so that the Court of Justice may rule on those applications. .
Article 2
Cases coming within the jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance by virtue of this Decision and which have been brought before the Court of Justice by the date on which this Decision enters into force; but or shall be referred to the Court of First Instance.
(a) in which the proceedings have at that date been stayed in accordance with the last sentence of the third paragraph of Article 54 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice;
(b) in which the proceedings have not at that date reached the close of the written procedure as defined in Article 44 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice
Article 3
This Decision shall take effect on the first day of the second month following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Done at Luxembourg, 26 April 2004. For the Council The President B. Cowen
Versions
Cited by
- Commission Decision of 16 April 2007 laying down new veterinary certificates for importing live animals, semen, embryos, ova and products of animal origin into the Community pursuant to Decisions 79/542/EEC, 92/260/EEC, 93/195/EEC, 93/196/EEC, 93/197/EEC, 95/328/EC, 96/333/EC, 96/539/EC, 96/540/EC, 2000/572/EC, 2000/585/EC, 2000/666/EC, 2002/613/EC, 2003/56/EC, 2003/779/EC, 2003/804/EC, 2003/858/EC, 2003/863/EC, 2003/881/EC, 2004/407/EC, 2004/438/EC, 2004/595/EC, 2004/639/EC and 2006/168/EC (notified under document number C(2007) 1622) (Text with EEA relevance) (2007/240/EC) Decision · Grade B
Annex II to Commission Decision 2004/407/EC of 26 April 2004 on transitional measures and certification rules under Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards imports from certain third countries of photographic gelatine,
- Commission Decision of 14 December 2009 amending Decision 2004/407/EC as regards authorising imports of photographic gelatine into the Czech Republic (notified under document C(2009) 9899) (Only the Czech, Dutch, English, French and German texts are authentic) (2009/960/EU) Decision · Grade B
Commission Decision 2004/407/EC of 26 April 2004 on transitional sanitary and certification rules under Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards import from certain third countries of photographic gelatine provides that Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom are to authorise the importation of certain gelatine exclusively intended for the photographic industry (photographic gelatine), in compliance with that Decision.
- Commission Decision of 14 December 2009 amending Decision 2004/407/EC as regards authorising imports of photographic gelatine into the Czech Republic (notified under document C(2009) 9899) (Only the Czech, Dutch, English, French and German texts are authentic) (2009/960/EU) Decision · Grade B
Decision 2004/407/EC provides that the importation of photographic gelatine is only authorised from the third countries listed in the Annex to that Decision, namely Japan and the United States of America. In accordance with that Decision, imported consignments have to be transported to the plant of destination under strict channelling conditions, in order to prevent potential risks to public and animal health.
- Commission Decision of 14 December 2009 amending Decision 2004/407/EC as regards authorising imports of photographic gelatine into the Czech Republic (notified under document C(2009) 9899) (Only the Czech, Dutch, English, French and German texts are authentic) (2009/960/EU) Decision · Grade B
The Czech Republic has submitted a request for the authorisation of imports of photographic gelatine from those third countries to an establishment on its territory. The Czech Republic has confirmed that the strict channelling conditions under Decision 2004/407/EC will be applied in order to prevent potential health risks.
- Commission Decision of 14 December 2009 amending Decision 2004/407/EC as regards authorising imports of photographic gelatine into the Czech Republic (notified under document C(2009) 9899) (Only the Czech, Dutch, English, French and German texts are authentic) (2009/960/EU) Decision · Grade B
Accordingly, and pending the review of the technical requirements for the import of animal by-products under the revised Animal by-products Regulation the Czech Republic should be allowed to authorise the importation of photographic gelatine subject to compliance with the conditions set out in Decision 2004/407/EC. However, for geographical reasons, those imports may take place via Germany.
- Commission Decision of 14 December 2009 amending Decision 2004/407/EC as regards authorising imports of photographic gelatine into the Czech Republic (notified under document C(2009) 9899) (Only the Czech, Dutch, English, French and German texts are authentic) (2009/960/EU) Decision · Grade B
Decision 2004/407/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
- Commission Decision of 14 December 2009 amending Decision 2004/407/EC as regards authorising imports of photographic gelatine into the Czech Republic (notified under document C(2009) 9899) (Only the Czech, Dutch, English, French and German texts are authentic) (2009/960/EU) Decision · Grade B
Decision 2004/407/EC is amended as follows:
- Commission Decision of 20 December 2007 amending Decision 2004/407/EC on transitional sanitary and certification rules under Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards import from certain third countries of photographic gelatine (notified under document number C(2007) 6487) (Only the English, French and Dutch texts are authentic) (2008/48/EC) Decision · Grade B
Commission Decision 2004/407/EC provides, by way of derogation from that prohibition in Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002, that Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom are to authorise the import of gelatine produced from materials containing bovine vertebral column classified as Category 1 material under that Regulation, exclusively intended for the photographic industry (photographic gelatine), in compliance with that Decision.
- Commission Decision of 20 December 2007 amending Decision 2004/407/EC on transitional sanitary and certification rules under Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards import from certain third countries of photographic gelatine (notified under document number C(2007) 6487) (Only the English, French and Dutch texts are authentic) (2008/48/EC) Decision · Grade B
France has informed the Commission that the Kodak factory in Châlon-sur-Saône no longer imports photographic gelatine from Japan and the USA in accordance with Decision 2004/407/EC.
- Commission Decision of 20 December 2007 amending Decision 2004/407/EC on transitional sanitary and certification rules under Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards import from certain third countries of photographic gelatine (notified under document number C(2007) 6487) (Only the English, French and Dutch texts are authentic) (2008/48/EC) Decision · Grade B
In addition, the format of the model veterinary certificate set out in Decision 2004/407/EC should be made compatible with the integrated computerised veterinary system TRACES, introduced by Commission Decision 2004/292/EC.
- Commission Decision of 20 December 2007 amending Decision 2004/407/EC on transitional sanitary and certification rules under Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards import from certain third countries of photographic gelatine (notified under document number C(2007) 6487) (Only the English, French and Dutch texts are authentic) (2008/48/EC) Decision · Grade B
Decision 2004/407/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
- Commission Decision of 20 December 2007 amending Decision 2004/407/EC on transitional sanitary and certification rules under Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards import from certain third countries of photographic gelatine (notified under document number C(2007) 6487) (Only the English, French and Dutch texts are authentic) (2008/48/EC) Decision · Grade B
Decision 2004/407/EC is amended as follows:
- Commission Decision of 21 April 2006 amending Commission Decision 2004/407/EC as regards imports of photographic gelatine (notified under document number C(2006) 1627) (Only the Dutch, English, French and German texts are authentic) (2006/311/EC) Decision · Grade B
Commission Decision 2004/407/EC of 26 April 2004 on transitional sanitary and certification rules under Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards import from certain third countries of photographic gelatine provides, by way of derogation from that prohibition in Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002, that France, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom are to authorise the import of certain gelatine exclusively intended for the photographic industry (photographic gelatine).
- Commission Decision of 21 April 2006 amending Commission Decision 2004/407/EC as regards imports of photographic gelatine (notified under document number C(2006) 1627) (Only the Dutch, English, French and German texts are authentic) (2006/311/EC) Decision · Grade B
Decision 2004/407/EC provides that photographic gelatine is only allowed from the third countries listed in that Decision, namely Japan and the United States of America.
- Commission Decision of 21 April 2006 amending Commission Decision 2004/407/EC as regards imports of photographic gelatine (notified under document number C(2006) 1627) (Only the Dutch, English, French and German texts are authentic) (2006/311/EC) Decision · Grade B
Luxembourg has confirmed the need to source photographic gelatine from the United States of America for the purposes of the photographic industry in Luxembourg. Accordingly Luxembourg should be allowed to authorise the import of photographic gelatine subject to compliance with the conditions set out in Decision 2004/407/EC. However, those imports may take place in Belgium.
- Commission Decision of 21 April 2006 amending Commission Decision 2004/407/EC as regards imports of photographic gelatine (notified under document number C(2006) 1627) (Only the Dutch, English, French and German texts are authentic) (2006/311/EC) Decision · Grade B
In order to facilitate the transfer from Belgium to Luxembourg of the imported photographic gelatine, the conditions in Annexes I and III to Decision 2004/407/EC should be amended slightly.
- Commission Decision of 21 April 2006 amending Commission Decision 2004/407/EC as regards imports of photographic gelatine (notified under document number C(2006) 1627) (Only the Dutch, English, French and German texts are authentic) (2006/311/EC) Decision · Grade B
Decision 2004/407/EC is amended as follows:
- Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 of 25 February 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and implementing Council Directive 97/78/EC as regards certain samples and items exempt from veterinary checks at the border under that Directive (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
In addition, certain transitional measures were adopted, in particular Commission Regulation (EC) No 878/2004 on the import and handling of certain Category 1 and Category 2 materials, Commission Decision 2004/407/EC on the import of certain materials for the production of photogelatine and Commission Regulation (EC) No 197/2006 on handling and disposal of former foodstuffs, to lay down risk-proportionate measures for certain specific uses of animal by-products.
- Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 of 25 February 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and implementing Council Directive 97/78/EC as regards certain samples and items exempt from veterinary checks at the border under that Directive (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
Decision 2004/407/EC;
- Commission Decision of 25 May 2010 amending Decision 2004/407/EC as regards authorising imports of photographic gelatine into the Czech Republic (notified under document C(2010) 3244) (Only the Czech, Dutch, English, French and German texts are authentic) (2010/301/EU) Decision · Grade B
Commission Decision 2004/407/EC of 26 April 2004 on transitional sanitary and certification rules under Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards import from certain third countries of photographic gelatine provides that Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom are to authorise the importation of certain gelatine exclusively intended for the photographic industry (photographic gelatine), in compliance with that Decision.