Council Decision of 21 December 2006 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (2006/1008/EC)

Versions

1. 2006-12-21

Cited by

• Council Decision of 28 June 2007 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decisions 2006/379/EC and 2006/1008/EC (2007/445/EC) Decision · Grade B

  On 21 December 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/1008/EC implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism adding certain other persons, groups and entities to the list of persons and entities to which that Regulation applies.

• Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) 20 June 2019 Judgment · Grade B

  The inclusion of the LTTE on that list has been maintained by Council Decision 2006/1008/EC of 21 December 2006 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation No 2580/2001 (OJ 2006 L 379, p. 123) and subsequently by the acts of the Council at issue in the main proceedings, namely by Decisions 2007/445, 2007/868, 2008/583 and 2009/62 and by Regulation No 501/2009. The statement of reasons for each of those acts was communicated to the LTTE after their adoption.

• Order of the General Court of 24 April 2012 — El Fatmi v Council (Joined Cases T-76/07, T-362/07 and T-409/08) Notice · Grade B

  Common foreign and security policyRestrictive measures with a view to combating terrorismWithdrawal from the list of persons concernedAction for annulmentNo need to adjudicate2012/C 174/35Language of the case: Dutch Applicant: Nouriddin El Fatmi (Vught, Netherlands) (represented by G. Pulles and A. M. van Eik (Cases T-76/07, T-362/07 and T-409/08), J. Pauw (Cases T-76/07 and T-362/07) and M. Uiterwaal (T-76/07), lawyers) Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by G. J. Van Hegelsom and E. Finnegan (T-76/07 and T-362/07), then by B. Driessen and E. Finnegan (T-76/07, T-3

• Action brought on 12 March 2007 — Ahmed Hamdi v Council of the European Union Notice · Grade B

  in any event, Decision 2006/1008/EC of 21 December 2006 (OJ 2006 L 379, p. 123) should be annulled;

• Action brought on 12 March 2007 — Ahmed Hamdi v Council of the European Union Notice · Grade B

  The applicant was sentenced to a period of imprisonment after the national court found that he had been proved to belong to a terrorist organisation, the Hofstadgroep. The applicant has appealed against that judgment. In Decision 2006/1008/EC the Council added the applicant to the list of persons and entities to which Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 applies. In support of his action the applicant submits that both the contested decision and the contested regulation were adopted in breach of essential procedural requirements and in particular with an inadequate statement of reasons. In the regulat

• Action brought on 20 February 2007 — Fahas v Council Notice · Grade B

  Annul Decision 2002/848/EC of 28 October 2002 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 and repealing Decision 2002/460/EC, by which the Council drew up an updated list of persons, groups and entities to which that regulation applies, and all decisions adopted in the meantime by the Council of the European Union in the meantime including Decision 2006/1008/EC of 21 December 2006, which is currently in force, in so far as they concern the applicant;

• Action brought on 20 February 2007 — Fahas v Council Notice · Grade B

  declare all aforementioned decisions up to and including Decision 2006/1008/EC of 21 December 2006 inapplicable to the applicant;

• Action brought on 20 February 2007 — Fahas v Council Notice · Grade B

  By its application, the applicant challenge Decision 2006/1008/EC and all previous decisions since Decision 2002/848/EC, in so far as he is expressly listed in the contested legislation. In support of his claim, the applicant alleges infringement of his right to a fair hearing and his right to effective legal protection. In addition, Decision 2006/1008/EC is unfounded and thus is in breach of Article 253 EC.

• Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 September 2009 — El Morabit v Council (Joined Cases T-37/07 and T-323/07) Notice · Grade B

  Common Foreign and Security PolicyRestrictive measures with a view to combating terrorismFreezing of fundsList of persons, groups and entitiesAction for annulment2009/C 256/42Language of the case: Dutch Applicant: Mohamed El Morabit (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: U. Sarikaya, lawyer) Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Finnegan, G. Van Hegelsom and B. Driessen, Agents) Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels and M. De Mol, and, in Case T-37/07, M. de Grave and, in Case T-323/07, Y. de Vries and M. Noort

• Notice for the attention of the persons, groups and entities on the list provided for in Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (2007/C 90/01) Notice · Grade B

  The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, groups and entities listed in Council Decision 2006/379/EC and Council Decision 2006/1008/EC. The Council of the European Union has determined that the reasons for including the persons, groups and entities that appear on the above-mentioned lists of persons, groups and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for under Council Regulation (EC) 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001, on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism, are still valid. Conseque