Commission Decision of 25 August 2006 recognising in principle the completeness of the dossiers submitted for detailed examination in view of the possible inclusion of chromafenozide, halosulfuron, tembotrione, valiphenal and Zucchini yellow mosaic virus — weak strain in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC (notified under document number C(2006) 3820) (Text with EEA relevance) (2006/586/EC)
Grade B
mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.
Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/decision/2006/586@2006-08-25/en
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant-protection on the market, and in particular Article 6(3) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) Directive 91/414/EEC provides for the development of a Community list of active substances authorised for incorporation in plant protection products.
(2) A dossier for the active substance chromafenozide was submitted by Calliope SAS to the authorities of Hungary on 12 December 2004 with an application to obtain its inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. For halosulfuron a dossier was submitted by Nissan Chemical Europe SARL to the authorities of Italy on 19 May 2005 with an application to obtain its inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. For tembotrione a dossier was submitted by Bayer CropScience AG to the authorities of the Austria on 25 November 2005 with an application to obtain its inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. For valiphenal, a dossier was submitted by ISAGRO SpA to the authorities of the Hungary on 2 September 2005 with an application to obtain its inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. For Zucchini yellow mosaic virus — weak strain a dossier was submitted by Central Science Laboratory to the authorities of the United Kingdom on 16 March 2005 with an application to obtain its inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
(3) The authorities of the United Kingdom, Austria, Italy and Hungary have indicated to the Commission that, on preliminary examination, the dossiers for the active substances concerned appear to satisfy the data and information requirements set out in Annex II to Directive 91/414/EEC. The dossiers submitted appear also to satisfy the data and information requirements set out in Annex III to Directive 91/414/EEC in respect of one plant protection product containing the active substance concerned. In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, the dossiers were subsequently forwarded by the respective applicants to the Commission and other Member States, and were referred to the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health.
(4) By this Decision it should be formally confirmed at Community level that the dossiers are considered as satisfying in principle the data and information requirements provided for in Annex II and, for at least one plant protection product containing the active substance concerned, the requirements set out in Annex III to Directive 91/414/EEC.
(5) This Decision should not prejudice the right of the Commission to request the applicant to submit further data or information in order to clarify certain points in the dossier.
(6) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Without prejudice to Article 6(4) of Directive 91/414/EEC, the dossiers concerning the active substances identified in the Annex to this Decision, which were submitted to the Commission and the Member States with a view to obtaining the inclusion of those substances in Annex I to that Directive, satisfy in principle the data and information requirements set out in Annex II to that Directive. The dossiers also satisfy the data and information requirements set out in Annex III to that Directive in respect of one plant protection product containing the active substance, taking into account the uses proposed.
Article 2
The rapporteur Member States shall pursue the detailed examination for the dossiers concerned and shall report the conclusions of their examinations accompanied by any recommendations on the inclusion or non-inclusion of the active substance concerned in Annex I of Directive 91/414/EEC and any conditions related thereto to the European Commission as soon as possible and at the latest within a period of one year from the date of publication of this Decision in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 25 August 2006. For the Commission Markos Kyprianou Member of the Commission
ANNEX
ANNEX ACTIVE SUBSTANCES CONCERNED BY THIS DECISION
No Common Name, CIPAC Identification Number Applicant Date of application Rapporteur Member State 1 Chromafenozide CIPAC-No: not yet allocated Calliope SAS 12 December 2004 HU 2 Halosulfuron CIPAC-No: not yet allocated Nissan Chemical Europe SARL 19 May 2005 IT 3 Tembotrione CIPAC-No: not yet allocated Bayer CropScience AG 25 November 2005 AT 4 Valiphenal CIPAC-No: not yet allocated ISAGRO SpA 2 September 2005 HU 5 Zucchini yellow mosaic virus –– weak strain CIPAC-No: not applicable Central Science Laboratory 16 March 2005 UK
Versions
Cited by
- Commission Decision of 2 April 2009 allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the new active substances topramezone, sulfuryl fluoride and zucchini yellow mosaic virus — weak strain (notified under document number C(2009) 2348) (Text with EEA relevance) (2009/311/EC) Decision · Grade B
In March 2005 the United Kingdom received an application from Central Science Laboratory concerning zucchini yellow mosaic virus — weak strain. Commission Decision 2006/586/EC confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 144/2014 of 14 February 2014 approving the active substance valifenalate, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
In accordance with Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, Council Directive 91/414/EEC is to apply, with respect to the procedure and the conditions for approval, to active substances for which a decision has been adopted in accordance with Article 6(3) of that Directive before 14 June 2011. For valifenalate the conditions of Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 are fulfilled by Commission Decision 2006/586/EC.
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 144/2014 of 14 February 2014 approving the active substance valifenalate, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC Hungary received on 2 September 2005 an application from Isagro S.p.A. for the inclusion of the active substance valifenalate in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Decision 2006/586/EC confirmed that the dossier was complete in the sense that it could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annexes II and III to Directive 91/414/EEC.
- Commission Implementing Decision of 12 August 2013 allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the active substances benalaxyl-M and valifenalate (notified under document C(2013) 5184) (Text with EEA relevance) (2013/431/EU) Decision · Grade B
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in September 2005 Hungary received an application from ISAGRO SpA for the inclusion of the active substance valifenalate in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Commission Decision 2006/586/EC confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annexes II and III to that Directive.
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/51 of 14 January 2015 approving the active substance chromafenozide, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 and allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for that active substance (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
In accordance with Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, Council Directive 91/414/EEC is to apply, with respect to the procedure and the conditions for approval, to active substances for which a decision has been adopted in accordance with Article 6(3) of that Directive before 14 June 2011. For chromafenozide the conditions of Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 are fulfilled by Commission Decision 2006/586/EC.
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/51 of 14 January 2015 approving the active substance chromafenozide, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 and allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for that active substance (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC Hungary received on 12 December 2004 an application from Arysta LifeScience (formerly Calliope SAS) on behalf of Nippon Kayaku for the inclusion of the active substance chromafenozide in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Decision 2006/586/EC confirmed that the dossier was complete in the sense that it could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annexes II and III to Directive 91/414/EEC.
- Commission Implementing Decision of 10 April 2012 allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the new active substances amisulbrom, chlorantraniliprole, meptyldinocap, pinoxaden, silver thiosulphate and tembotrione (notified under document C(2012) 2259) (Text with EEA relevance) (2012/191/EU) Decision · Grade B
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in November 2005 Austria received an application from Bayer CropScience AG for the inclusion of the active substance tembotrione in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Commission Decision 2006/586/EC confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.
- Commission Implementing Decision of 11 October 2011 allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the new active substances benalaxyl-M, gamma-cyhalothrin and valifenalate (notified under document C(2011) 7092) (Text with EEA relevance) (2011/671/EU) Decision · Grade B
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in September 2005 Hungary received an application from ISAGRO SpA for the inclusion of the active substance valifenalate, previously referred to as valiphenal, in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Commission Decision 2006/586/EC confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.
- Commission Implementing Decision of 4 July 2012 allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the new active substances bixafen, Candida oleophila strain O, fluopyram, halosulfuron, potassium iodide, potassium thiocyanate and spirotetramat (notified under document C(2012) 4436) (Text with EEA relevance) (2012/363/EU) Decision · Grade B
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in May 2005 Italy received an application from Nissan Chemical Europe SARL for the inclusion of the active substance halosulfuron in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Commission Decision 2006/586/EC confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.
- Commission Decision of 9 March 2010 allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the new active substances flonicamid, silver thiosulphate and tembotrione (notified under document C(2010) 1255) (Text with EEA relevance) (2010/149/EU) Decision · Grade B
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in November 2005 Austria received an application from Bayer CropScience AG for the inclusion of the active substance tembotrione in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Commission Decision 2006/586/EC confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 356/2013 of 18 April 2013 approving the active substance halosulfuron-methyl, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
In accordance with Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, Council Directive 91/414/EEC is to apply, with respect to the procedure and the conditions for approval, to active substances for which a decision has been adopted in accordance with Article 6(3) of that Directive before 14 June 2011. For halosulfuron-methyl the conditions of Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 are fulfilled by Commission Decision 2006/586/EC.
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 356/2013 of 18 April 2013 approving the active substance halosulfuron-methyl, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, Italy received on 19 May 2005 an application from Nissan Chemical Europe S.A.R.L. for the inclusion of the active substance halosulfuron-methyl in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Decision 2006/586/EC confirmed that the dossier was complete in the sense that it could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annexes II and III to Directive 91/414/EEC.
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1237/2012 of 19 December 2012 approving the active substance Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus — weak strain, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
In accordance with Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, Council Directive 91/414/EEC is to apply, with respect to the procedure and the conditions for approval, to active substances for which a decision has been adopted in accordance with Article 6(3) of that Directive before 14 June 2011. For Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus — weak strain the conditions of Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 are fulfilled by Commission Decision 2006/586/EC.
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1237/2012 of 19 December 2012 approving the active substance Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus — weak strain, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC the United Kingdom received on 16 March 2005 an application from Bio-Oz Biotechnologies Ltd for the inclusion of the active substance Zucchini Yellow Mosaic Virus — weak strain in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Decision 2006/586/EC confirmed that the dossier was complete in the sense that it could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annexes II and III to Directive 91/414/EEC.
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1192/2013 of 22 November 2013 approving the active substance tembotrione, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
In accordance with Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, Council Directive 91/414/EEC is to apply, with respect to the procedure and the conditions for approval, to active substances for which a decision has been adopted in accordance with Article 6(3) of that Directive before 14 June 2011. For tembotrione the conditions of Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 are fulfilled by Commission Decision 2006/586/EC.
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1192/2013 of 22 November 2013 approving the active substance tembotrione, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, Austria received on 25 November 2005 an application from Bayer CropScience AG for the inclusion of the active substance tembotrione in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC. Decision 2006/586/EC confirmed that the dossier was complete in the sense that it could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annexes II and III to Directive 91/414/EEC.