Council Decision of 30 January 2006 amending and extending Decision 2001/923/EC establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the Pericles programme) (2006/75/EC)
Grade B
mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.
Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/decision/2006/75@2006-01-30/en
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the third sentence of Article 123(4) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank,
Whereas:
(1) In accordance with Article 13(3)(a) of Council Decision 2001/923/EC, the Commission is to send to the European Parliament and to the Council by 30 June 2005 a report, which shall be independent of the programme manager, evaluating the relevance, the efficiency and the effectiveness of the programme and a communication on whether this programme should be continued and adapted, accompanied by an appropriate proposal.
(2) The evaluation report provided for in Article 13 of that Decision was issued on 30 November 2004. It concludes that the programme has been achieving its objectives and recommends that the programme be continued.
(3) A financial reference amount, within the meaning of point 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure is included in the Decision for the entire duration of the programme, without thereby affecting the powers of the budgetary authority as they are defined by the Treaty.
(4) The continuation of the programme reflects the need for continuing vigilance, training and technical assistance necessary to sustain the protection of the euro against counterfeiting.
(5) The efficiency of the programme in protecting the euro could be enhanced if the technical support were enlarged also to provide, with the involvement of Europol, for financial support for cooperation in cross-border operations and it could benefit, in duly justified cases, from greater flexibility in the proportion of the costs the Community may bear and in the number of projects one Member State may present.
(6) Decision 2001/923/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Article 1 Amendments
Decision 2001/923/EC is hereby amended as follows:
1. the last sentence of Article 1(2) shall be replaced by the following: It shall run from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2006.;
2. the following point shall be added to Article 2(2):
(e) an aim to publish the results achieved, as part of the exchange of information, experience and good practices.;
3. the following point shall be added to Article 3(3):
(d) on a secondary basis financial support for cooperation in cross-border operations when such support is not available from other European institutions and bodies.;
4. the first subparagraph of Article 6 shall be replaced by the following: The financial reference amount for the implementation of the Community action programme for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2005 shall be EUR 4 million. The financial reference amount for the implementation of the Community action programme for the period from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2006 shall be EUR 1 million.;
5. in Article 10(1), the introductory phrase shall be replaced by the following: The Community shall, in duly justified cases, bear up to 80 % of the cost of the operational support referred to in Article 3 by way of co-financing, in particular:;
6. in Article 11 70 % shall be replaced by 80 %;
7. Article 12 shall be amended as follows:
(a) the second subparagraph of paragraph 1 shall be replaced by the following: Member States may present one or, exceptionally, two projects a year concerning the workshops, meetings and seminars referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 3(2). Projects in connection with placements, exchanges or assistance may also be presented.;
(b) the following subparagraph shall be added to paragraph 1: In case more than one proposal are presented by one Member State, coordination is carried out by the national competent authority defined in Article 2(b) fourth indent of Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001.;
(c) in paragraph 2, point (e) shall be replaced by the following:
(e) the intrinsic quality of the project in terms of its conception, organisation, presentation, objectives and cost-effectiveness ratio;
(d) the following point shall be added in paragraph 2:
(h) compatibility with work being carried out or planned as part of EU action in the field of combating currency counterfeiting.
Article 2 Applicability
This Decision shall have effect in the participating Member States as defined in the first indent of Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 974/98 of 3 May 1998 on the introduction of the euro.
Article 3 Entry into force
This Decision shall take effect on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. It shall apply from 1 January 2006.
Done at Brussels, 30 January 2006. For the Council The President U. Plassnik
Versions
Cited by
- Commission Decision of 28 November 2011 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union of the Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Monaco 2012/C 23/07 Decision · Grade B
Council Framework Decision 2001/413/JHA of 28 May 2001 combating fraud and counterfeiting of non-cash means of payment, OJ L 149, 2.6.2001, p. 1. Council Regulation (EC) No 2182/2004 of 6 December 2004 concerning medals and tokens similar to euro coins, OJ L 373, 21.12.2004, p. 1, amended by: Council Regulation (EC) No 46/2009 of 18 December 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 2182/2004 concerning medals and tokens similar to euro coins, OJ L 17, 22.1.2009, p. 5. Council Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001 of 28 June 2001 laying down measures necessary for the protection of the euro against counterfeiti
- Commission Decision of 8 April 2015 amending the Annex to the Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra 2015/C 115/03 Decision · Grade B
Legal Provisions to be implemented Deadline for implementing Prevention of money laundering 1 Council Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February 2005 on Confiscation of Crime-Related Proceeds, Instrumentalities and Property, OJ L 68, 15.3.2005, p. 49. 31 March 2015 2 Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing, OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p. 15. 30 September 2013 Amended by: 3 Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
- Commission Decision of 6 March 2014 updating the Annex to the Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra 2014/C 73/04 Decision · Grade B
Council Decision 2006/75/EC of 30 January 2006 amending and extending Decision 2001/923/EC establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the Pericles programme) (OJ L 36, 8.2.2006, p. 40)
- Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2016/150 of the European Union’s general budget for the financial year 2016 Act · Grade B
The Commission, when implementing this article, should take duly into account the outcomes of the meetings of the Interinstitutional Group on Information (IGI). The implementation of the Commission’s communication strategy takes place in close coordination with the Member States and the European Parliament. The Commission adopts a strategy and an annual work plan drawing on the orientations set out in its Communication of 11 August 2004 (COM(2004) 552 final) and it reports regularly to the relevant committee of the European Parliament on the implementation of the programme and on planning for
- Commission Decision of 6 March 2014 updating the Annex to the Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Vatican City State 2014/C 73/06 Decision · Grade B
Council Decision 2006/75/EC of 30 January 2006 (OJ L 36, 8.2.2006, p. 40)
- Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2017/292 of the European Union’s general budget for the financial year 2017 Act · Grade B
The Commission, when implementing this article, should take duly into account the outcomes of the meetings of the Interinstitutional Group on Information (IGI). The implementation of the Commission’s communication strategy takes place in close coordination with the Member States and the European Parliament. The Commission adopts a strategy and an annual work plan drawing on the orientations set out in its Communication of 11 August 2004 (COM(2004) 552 final) and it reports regularly to the relevant committee of the European Parliament on the implementation of the programme and on planning for
- Council Decision of 30 January 2006 extending to the non-participating Member States the application of Decision 2006/75/EC amending and extending Decision 2001/923/EC establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the Pericles programme) (2006/76/EC) Decision · Grade B
When adopting Decision 2006/75/EC the Council indicated that it should apply in the participating Member States as defined in the first indent of Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 974/98 of 3 May 1998 on the introduction of the euro.
- Council Decision of 30 January 2006 extending to the non-participating Member States the application of Decision 2006/75/EC amending and extending Decision 2001/923/EC establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the Pericles programme) (2006/76/EC) Decision · Grade B
The application of Decision 2006/75/EC shall be extended to Member States other than the participating Member States as defined in the first indent of Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 974/98.
- Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2018/251 of the European Union’s general budget for the financial year 2018 Act · Grade B
The Commission, when implementing this article, should take duly into account the outcomes of the meetings of the Interinstitutional Group on Information (IGI). The implementation of the Commission’s communication strategy takes place in close coordination with the Member States and the European Parliament. The Commission adopts a strategy and an annual work plan drawing on the orientations set out in its Communication of 11 August 2004 (COM(2004) 552 final) and it reports regularly to the relevant committee of the European Parliament on the implementation of the programme and on planning for
- Commission Decision of 2 July 2012 updating the Annex to the Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Vatican City State (2012/355/EU) Decision · Grade B
Council Decision 2006/75/EC of 30 January 2006 amending and extending Decision 2001/923/EC establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the Pericles programme), OJ L 36, 8.2.2006, p. 40.