Commission Decision of 16 October 2007 on the compatibility with Community law of measures taken by the United Kingdom pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (Text with EEA relevance) (2007/730/EC)
Grade B
mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.
Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/decision/2007/730@2007-10-16/en
Contents
- Preamble
- ANNEX
- ANNEX
- Chapter 55
- PART IV Sporting and other events of national interest
- Listed events
- (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)
- (1)(2)
- (1)(2)(3)
- (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
- Categories of service
- (1)
- (1)(2)
- Restriction on televising of listed event
- (1)
- Power of Commission to impose penalty
- (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
- (1)
- (1)(2)
- (1)(2)(3)(4)
- Report to Secretary of State
- (1)
- (1)(2)
- Code of guidance
- (1)
- (1)(2)(3)(4)
- Interpretation of Part IV and supplementary provisions
- 2000 No 54 BROADCASTING
- The Television Broadcasting Regulations 2000
- Citation and commencement
- SCHEDULE
- Regulation 3 Amendments of broadcasting act 1996: sporting and other events of national interest
- grp_1 Categories of service
- (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)
- (1)
- (1)(2)
- (1)(2)(3)(4)
- grp_3
- APPENDIX 1 UK listed sporting events
- Group B Note:
- APPENDIX 2
- Sports broadcasting
- grp_2 Notes for guidance on the listing of major sports events
- Listed sporting events
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities, and in particular Article 3a(2) thereof,
Having regard to the opinion of the Committee established pursuant to Article 23a of Directive 89/552/EEC,
Whereas:
(1) By letter of 25 September 1998, the United Kingdom (hereinafter the UK) notified to the Commission measures taken pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Directive 89/552/EEC. On 2 November 1998, the Commission communicated those measures to the other Member States and received observations of the Committee established pursuant to Article 23a of Directive 89/552/EEC, at its meeting on 20 November 1998. By letter of 23 December 1998, the Commission informed the UK that there were doubts as to the scope of the measures notified which prevented it from assessing whether those measures were compatible with Community law. The UK notified an amended version of these measures to the Commission by letter of 5 May 2000.
(2) The Commission verified, within three months from this notification, that these measures are compatible with Community law, in particular as regards the proportionality of the measures and the transparency of the national consultation procedure.
(3) In its examination, the Commission took into consideration the available data on the UK media landscape.
(4) The list of events of major importance for society included in the UK measures was drawn up in a clear and transparent manner and a far-reaching consultation had been launched in the UK.
(5) The Commission was satisfied that the events listed in the UK measures met at least two of the following criteria considered to be reliable indicators of the importance of events for society: (i) a special general resonance within the Member State, and not simply a significance to those who ordinarily follow the sport or activity concerned; (ii) a generally recognised, distinct cultural importance for the population in the Member State, in particular as a catalyst of cultural identity; (iii) involvement of the national team in the event concerned in the context of a competition or tournament of international importance; and (iv) the fact that the event has traditionally been broadcast on free television and has commanded large television audiences.
(6) A significant number of the events listed in the UK measures, including the summer and winter Olympic Games as well as the World Cup Finals and the European Championship Finals tournaments, fall within the category of events traditionally considered to be of major importance for society, as referred to explicitly in recital 18 of Directive 97/36/EC. These events have a special general resonance in the UK in their entirety, as they are particularly popular with the general public (irrespective of the nationality of the participants), not just with those who usually follow sports events.
(7) The FA Cup Final has a special general resonance in the UK as the pre-eminent single match in English domestic football and a true national occasion, as well as an event of worldwide renown.
(8) The Scottish FA Cup Final has a special general resonance in Scotland, as an event of similar stature to the (English) FA Cup Final.
(9) The Grand National has a general resonance in the UK as a long-established event of worldwide renown and appeal, as well as a generally recognised, distinct cultural importance for the population in that country, forming part of the UK national consciousness.
(10) The Derby has a general resonance in the UK as the pre-eminent event in the flat racing season and a part of the national calendar, as well as a generally recognised, distinct cultural importance for the population in that country, as a quintessentially British occasion transcending social class and commanding interest throughout the country.
(11) The Wimbledon Tennis Finals have a general resonance in the UK as the pre-eminent UK tennis tournament of worldwide renown, commanding extensive media coverage. Moreover, the general resonance and distinct cultural importance of this event in the UK is due to the success of the UK participants in this competition.
(12) The Rugby League Challenge Cup Final and the Rugby World Cup tournament have a general resonance in the UK as events of wide general interest appealing to people who do not usually follow these competitions. The Six Nations Rugby Tournament matches involving home countries have a special general resonance in the UK as an important event in the UK sporting calendar.
(13) The cricket Test Matches played in England have a general resonance in the UK as the flagship events in the national summer sport, involving the England team and top overseas sides, with an appeal transcending social class and region. The Cricket World Cup matches (the final, semi-finals and matches involving home nations’ teams) have a general resonance in the UK as they form part of the only self-contained world championship in this sport, involving the UK teams in competition at the highest level. Moreover, these cricket events have a generally recognised, distinct cultural importance for the population in the UK due to its multi-cultural appeal, which helps social cohesion and reinforces the UK’s Commonwealth links.
(14) The Commonwealth Games have a special general resonance in the UK as an established event involving UK competitors in high-level competition.
(15) The World Athletics Championship has a special general resonance in the UK as the pre-eminent event devoted solely to athletics and involving UK participants at the highest level.
(16) The Ryder Cup has a special general resonance in the UK as a major and unique international event involving UK players in top-level competition.
(17) The (British) Open Golf Tournament has a special general resonance in the UK as the pre-eminent event in British golf, and one of the pre-eminent and the oldest events in world golf.
(18) The listed events, including those to be considered as a whole and not as a series of individual events, have traditionally been broadcast on free television and have commanded large television audiences. Where, exceptionally, this has not been the case (the listed matches of the Cricket World Cup), the listing is limited (as it includes the final, semi-finals and matches involving national teams) and requires only adequate secondary coverage, and, in any case, fulfils two of the criteria considered to be reliable indicators of the importance of events for society (recital 13).
(19) The UK measures appear proportionate so as to justify a derogation from the fundamental EC Treaty freedom to provide services on the basis of an overriding reason of public interest, which is to ensure wide public access to broadcasts of events of major importance for society.
(20) The UK measures are compatible with EC competition rules in that the definition of qualified broadcasters for the broadcasting of listed events is based on objective criteria that allow actual and potential competition for the acquisition of the rights to broadcast these events. In addition, the number of listed events is not disproportionate so as to distort competition on the downstream free television and pay television markets.
(21) The proportionality of the UK measures is reinforced by the fact that a number of the events listed require adequate secondary coverage only.
(22) After communication by the Commission to the other Member States of the UK measures and consultation of the Committee established pursuant to Article 23a of Directive 89/552/EEC, the Director-General for Education and Culture informed the UK, by letter of 28 July 2000, that the European Commission did not intend to object to the measures notified.
(23) Those measures were published in the C Series of the Official Journal of the European Communities in accordance with Article 3a(2) of Directive 89/552/EEC.
(24) It follows from the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-33/01, Infront WM v Commission, that the declaration that measures taken pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Directive 89/552/EEC are compatible with Community law constitutes a decision, which must therefore be adopted by the Commission. Accordingly, it is necessary to declare by this Decision that the measures notified by the UK are compatible with Community law. The measures, as set out in the Annex to this Decision, should be published in the Official Journal of the European Union in accordance with Article 3a(2) of Directive 89/552/EEC.
(25) In order to guarantee legal certainty, this Decision should apply as from the date of the first publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the measures notified by the UK,
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Article 1
The measures taken pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Directive 89/552/EEC and notified by the United Kingdom to the Commission on 5 May 2000, as published in the Official Journal of the European Communities C 328 of 18 November 2000, are compatible with Community law.
Article 2
The measures, as set out in the Annex to this Decision, shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union in accordance with Article 3a(2) of Directive 89/552/EEC.
Article 3
This Decision shall apply as from 18 November 2000.
Done at Brussels, 16 October 2007. For the Commission Viviane Reding Member of the Commission
ANNEX
ANNEX
The measures taken by the UK to be published pursuant to Article 3a(2) of Directive 89/552/EEC are set out in the following extracts: [Extracts from Part IV of the Broadcasting Act 1996] [Extracts from the Television Broadcasting Regulations 2000]
BROADCASTING ACT 1996
Chapter 55
PART IV Sporting and other events of national interest
[…]
Listed events
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)
97. For the purposes of this Part, a listed event is a sporting or other event of national interest which is for the time being included in a list drawn up by the Secretary of State for the purposes of this Part. The Secretary of State shall not at any time draw up, revise or cease to maintain such a list as is mentioned in subsection 1 unless he has first consulted: and for the purposes of this subsection a relevant event is a sporting or other event of national interest which the Secretary of State proposes to include in, or omit from, the list. As soon as he has drawn up or revised such a list as is mentioned in subsection 1, the Secretary of State shall publish the list in such manner as he considers appropriate for bringing it to the attention of: In this section national interest includes interest within England, Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland. The addition of any relevant event to such a list as is mentioned in subsection 1 shall not affect: The list drawn up by the Secretary of State for the purposes of section 182 of the 1990 Act, as that list is in force immediately before the commencement of this section, shall be taken to have been drawn up for the purposes of this Part.
(1)(2)
(a) the BBC;
(b) the Welsh Authority;
(c) the Commission; and
(d) in relation to a relevant event, the person from whom the rights to televise that event may be acquired;
(1)(2)(3)
(a) the persons mentioned in subsection 2; and
(b) every person who is the holder of a licence granted by the Commission under Part I of the 1990 Act or a digital programme licence granted by them under Part I of this Act.
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
(a) the validity of any contract entered into before the date on which the Secretary of State consulted the persons mentioned in subsection 2 in relation to the proposed addition; or
(b) the exercise of any rights acquired under such a contract.
Categories of service
(1)(2)(3)(4) 98. For the purposes of this Part, television programme services shall be divided into two categories as follows: The services referred to in subsection 1(a) are: The Secretary of State may by order amend subsection 2 so as to remove any service from, or add any service to, the services specified in it. An order under subsection 3 shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.
(1)
(a) such of the services specified in subsection 2 as are provided without any charge being made for the reception of programmes included in the service;
(b) all televison programme services not for the time being falling within paragraph (a).
(1)(2)
(a) regional and national Channel 3 services;
(b) Channel 4; and
(c) the television broadcasting services provided by the BBC.
Restriction on televising of listed event
(1)(2)(3)(4) 101. A person providing a service falling within either of the categories set out in subsection 1 of section 98 (the first service) for reception in the United Kingdom or in any area of the United Kingdom shall not, without the previous consent of the Commission, include in that service live coverage of the whole or any part of a listed event unless: The Commission may revoke any consent given by them under subsection 1. Failure to comply with subsection 1 shall not affect the validity of any contract. Subsection 1 shall not have effect where the television programme provider providing the first service is exercising rights acquired before the commencement of this section.
(1)
(a) another person, who is providing a service falling within the other category set out in that subsection (the second service), has acquired the right to include in the second service live coverage of the whole of the event or of that part of the event; and
(b) the area for which the second service is provided consists of or includes the whole, or substantially the whole, of the area for which the first service is provided.
Power of Commission to impose penalty
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
102. If the Commission: they may require him to pay, within a specified period, a specified financial penalty to the Commission. If the Commission are satisfied that, in connection with an application for consent under subsection 1 of section 101, the holder of a licence under Part I of the 1990 Act or a digital programme licence under Part I of this Act has: they may require him to pay, within a specified period, a specified financial penalty to the Commission. The amount of any financial penalty imposed on any person under subsection 1 or 2 shall not exceed the amount produced by multiplying the relevant consideration by the prescribed multiplier. In subsection 3: An order under subsection 4(b) shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament. Where the Commission receive any amount payable to them by virtue of subsection 1 or 2, that amount shall not form part of the revenues of the Commission but shall be paid into the Consolidated Fund. Any amount payable by any person to the Commission by virtue of subsection 1 or 2 shall be recoverable by them as a debt due to them from that person.
(1)
(a) are satisfied that the holder of a licence under Part I of the 1990 Act or a digital programme licence under Part I of this Act has failed to comply with subsection 1 of section 101; and
(b) are not satisfied that in all the circumstances it would be unreasonable to expect him to have complied with that subsection;
(1)(2)
(a) provided them with information which was false in a material particular; or
(b) withheld any material information with the intention of causing the Commission to be misled;
(1)(2)(3)(4)
(a) the relevant consideration means an amount determined by the Commission as representing so much of any consideration paid by the person on whom the penalty is being imposed as is attributable to the acquisition of the rights to televise the event in question; and
(b) the prescribed multiplier means such number as the Secretary of State may from time to time by order prescribe.
Report to Secretary of State
(1)(2)(3) 103. If the Commission: they shall make a report on the matter to the Secretary of State. If the Commission are satisfied that, in connection with an application for consent under subsection 1 of section 101, a broadcasting body has: they shall make a report on the matter to the Secretary of State. In this section broadcasting body means the BBC or the Welsh Authority.
(1)
(a) are satisfied that a broadcasting body has failed to comply with subsection 1 of section 101; and
(b) are not satisfied that in all the circumstances it would be unreasonable to expect the body to have complied with that subsection,
(1)(2)
(a) provided them with information which was false in a material particular: or
(b) withheld any material information with the intention of causing the Commission to be misled,
Code of guidance
(1)(2)(3)(4) 104. The Commission shall draw up, and may from time to time review, a code: In exercising their powers under this Part, the Commission shall have regard to the provisions of the code. Before drawing up or revising the code the Commission shall consult such persons as appear to the Commission to be appropriate. As soon as the Commission have drawn up or revised such a code, the Commission shall publish the code in such manner as they consider appropriate for bringing it to the attention of:
(1)
(a) specifying the circumstances in which the televising of listed events generally, or of a particular listed event, is, or is not, to be treated as live for the purposes of this Part; and
(b) giving guidance as to the matters which they will take into account in determining:
(b)
(i) whether to give or revoke their consent under section 101(1), or
(ii) for the purposes of section 102(1) or 103(1), whether in all the circumstances it is unreasonable to expect a television programme provider to comply with section 101(1).
(1)(2)(3)(4)
(a) the BBC;
(b) the Welsh Authority;
(c) every person from whom the rights to televise a listed event may be acquired; and
(d) every person who is the holder of a licence granted by the Commission under Part I of the 1990 Act or a digital programme licence granted by them under Part I of this Act.
Interpretation of Part IV and supplementary provisions
(1)(2) 105. In this Part (unless the context otherwise requires): Section 182 of the 1990 Act (certain events not to be shown on pay-per-view terms) shall cease to have effect.
Channel 4 has the same meaning as in Part I of the 1990 Act;
the Commission means the Independent Television Commission;
listed event has the meaning given by section 97(1);
live shall be construed in accordance with the code drawn up under section 104;
national Channel 3 service and regional Channel 3 service have the same meaning as in Part I of the 1990 Act;
television broadcasting service has the same meaning as in Part I of the 1990 Act;
television programme provider has the meaning given by section 99(2);
television programme service has the same meaning as in Part I of the 1990 Act.
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS
[…] […] 14 January 2000 Chris Smith Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
2000 No 54 BROADCASTING
The Television Broadcasting Regulations 2000
Made: 14 January 2000 Laid before Parliament: 14 January 2000 Coming into force: 19 January 2000 Whereas the Secretary of State is a Minister designated for the purposes of section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 with regard to measures relating to television broadcasting; Now, therefore, the Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred on him by section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 and all other powers enabling him in that behalf, hereby makes the following Regulations:
Citation and commencement
(1)(2) 1. These Regulations may be cited as the Television Broadcasting Regulations 2000 These Regulations shall come into force on 19 January 2000.
3. Part IV of the Broadcasting Act 1996 (sporting and other events of national interest) is amended in accordance with the Schedule to these Regulations.
SCHEDULE
[Extracts from the ITC Code on Sports and other Listed Events, revised January 2000]
Regulation 3 Amendments of broadcasting act 1996: sporting and other events of national interest
[…] […]
1. For section 98 there is substituted:
grp_1 Categories of service
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)
98. For the purposes of this Part, television programme services and EEA satellite services shall be divided into two categories as follows: In this section, the qualifying conditions, in relation to a service, means the conditions: There shall be disregarded for the purposes of subsection (2)(a) any fee payable in respect of a television licence, as defined by section 1(7) of the Wireless Telegraphy Act 1949. The condition in subsection (2)(b): The Commission shall from time to time publish a list of the television programme services and EEA satellite services which appear to them to satisfy the qualifying conditions. In this section, EEA satellite service means any service which:
(1)
(a) those television programme services and EEA satellite services which for the time being satisfy the qualifying conditions, and
(b) all other television programme services and EEA satellite services.
(1)(2)
(a) that the service is provided without any consideration being required for reception of the service, and
(b) that the service is received by at least 95 % of the population of the United Kingdom.
(1)(2)(3)(4)
(a) is to be taken to be satisfied in relation to a regional Channel 3 service if it is satisfied in relation to Channel 3 as a whole, and
(b) is to be taken to be satisfied in relation to Channel 4 if it is satisfied in relation to Channel 4 and S4C taken together.
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)
(a) consists in the transmission for general reception of television programmes by satellite, and
(b) is provided by a person who for the purposes of Council Directive 89/552/EEC is under the jurisdiction of an EEA State other than the United Kingdom.
3. In Section 101 (restriction on televising of listed event), in subsection (1), for person, in the first place where it occurs, there is substituted television programme provider.
9. In section 105(1) (interpretation of Part IV):
grp_3
(a) after the definition of the Commission there is inserted: designated event, in relation to an EEA State other than the United Kingdom, has the meaning given by section 101A;;
(b) in the definition of live, before shall there is inserted in relation to the televising of a listed event; and
(c) after the definition of national Channel 3 service and regional Channel 3 service there is inserted: S4C has the same meaning as in Part I of the 1990 Act;
Code on sports and other listed events
(revised January 2000) […] […] January 2000
1. The Broadcasting Act 1996, (the Act) as amended by the Television Broadcasting Regulations 2000 (the Regulations), requires the ITC to draw up, and from time to time review, a code giving guidance on certain matters relating to the televising of sports and other events of national interest which have been listed by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport. This code has been produced by the ITC, after consultation with broadcasters, sports bodies, the holders of sports rights and other interested parties, for the purpose of fulfilling this statutory duty, as defined under Section 104 of the Act. […]
2. The Act restricts the acquisition by television programme providers of exclusive rights to the whole or any part of live television coverage of listed events and the broadcasting on an exclusive basis of such coverage without the previous consent of the ITC (see Part IV of the Act). Under the Act the ITC has powers to impose a financial penalty on its licensees if the restrictions on broadcasting live coverage of listed events have not been observed, if the ITC has been given false information or if material information has been withheld. In the case of the BBC and S4C the ITC must report the matter to the Secretary of State. The ITC will have regard to the provisions of the Code in exercising these powers.
3. Listed events are drawn up by the Secretary of State in accordance with the Act, and the current list is at Appendix 1. The Secretary of State may add events to and delete events from the list at any time, but only after consultation with the BBC, the Welsh Authority, the ITC and the holder of the rights for the event in question. In June 1998 the Secretary of State extended the list to include Group B events on the understanding that they would be treated differently from Group A events. Group A events are those events which may not be covered live on an exclusive basis unless certain criteria are met. The criteria and matters to be taken into account by the ITC are set out at paragraphs 12 to 16. Group B events are those events that may not be broadcast live on an exclusive basis unless adequate provision has been made for secondary coverage. The minimum standard of secondary coverage the ITC will regard as adequate provision is set out at paragraphs 17 and 18.
6. For the purpose of the live broadcasting of listed events the Act defines two categories of television programme services: those television programme services and EEA satellite services which for the time being satisfy the qualifying conditions (the first category) and all other television programme services and EEA satellite services (the second category). The qualifying conditions are defined as (a) that the service is provided without any consideration being required for reception for the service and (b) that the service is received by at least 95 % of the population of the United Kingdom. Television programme services and EEA satellite services which fall within the first category will appear in a list published from time to time by the ITC (see Appendix 2). These requirements are set out in the Act as amended by the Television Broadcasting Regulations 2000. Any contract for televising live coverage of a listed event which is entered into by a broadcaster must state that the rights are available for showing the event on a service falling within only one of the two categories, i.e., separate contracts must exist for each category. A broadcaster providing a service in either category (the first service) is prohibited from showing exclusively live coverage of the whole or any part of a Group A event without the previous consent of the Commission unless a broadcaster providing a service in the other category (the second service) has acquired the right to show live coverage of the event or the same part of the event. The area served by the second service must consist of or include the whole, or substantially the whole, of the area served by the first service. The first and second services may be provided by licensees in the same ownership, but between them they must include a broadcaster in each of the two categories described above.
7. The restrictions apply only to rights acquired either after the commencement of Section 101 of the 1996 Act, i.e. 1 October 1996 or after the Secretary of State began to consult rights holders about changes to the list, i.e. 25 November 1997, as shown in Appendix 1.
8. An event may be listed because it is of national interest within England, Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland separately. This is the basis on which the Scottish FA Cup Final, for example, has been listed. The Act allows for those events to be shown only in the relevant part of the United Kingdom in which there is likely to be most viewer interest. The reference to Channel 3 in Appendix 2, therefore, means individual or groups of regional Channel 3 services, or Channel 3 as a whole.
9. The Act is concerned with providing an opportunity for live coverage to be made available. It is important to emphasise that the Act does not require or guarantee live coverage of listed events, including coverage on Channel 3, Channel 4 and the BBC. Nor does the Act prohibit exclusive live coverage of listed events on these or other services subjects to the ITC being satisfied that certain criteria have been met (see paragraphs 12-18).
10. The specific guidance which the ITC is required to give is set out below. The ITC will keep this guidance under review and may amend it in the light of experience.
11. Section 104 of the Act requires the ITC to specify the circumstances in which the coverage of listed events generally, or of a particular listed event, is, or is not, to be treated as live. In considering this matter the ITC has taken the view that the interests of viewers lie in allowing them to participate in the event as it happens, as far as possible. This suggests that live television coverage of most sports events, including those taking place in different time zones, should be defined as coverage which is simultaneous with the event (i.e. as the event is happening). However, given the different nature and length of events, no single definition is possible. The following interpretation should allow for necessary flexibility:
the restrictions on live coverage will apply while the event concerned is in progress,
if the event involves separate games or matches, the restrictions will apply while each game or match is in progress,
in the case of a single event which is scheduled to last over several days the restrictions will apply to each day’s play, while it is in progress,
in the case of an event which consists of defined separate parts which overlap in time (e.g. the Olympic Games or the FIFA World Cup Finals) and cannot therefore be televised simultaneously in full, the restrictions will apply to each match or competition as if it was a single event.
12. Under Section 104(1)(b) of the Act the ITC is required to provide guidance as to the matters it will take into account in determining whether to grant its consent to a broadcaster providing a service in one category (the first service) to provide exclusive live coverage of an event (of part of an event) where no broadcaster providing a service in the other category (the second service) has acquired the same rights, or where the area for which the second service is to be provided does not consist of or include the whole, or substantially the whole, of the area for which the first service is provided.
13. In deciding whether to give its consent it may be sufficient for the ITC to establish that the availability of the rights was generally known and no broadcaster providing a service in the other category had expressed an interest in their acquisition to the rights holder, or had not bid for the rights. However, the ITC will wish to be satisfied that broadcasters have had a genuine opportunity to acquire the rights on fair and reasonable terms and, in reaching a view, will take account of some or all of the following criteria:
any invitation to express interest, whether in the form of public advertisement or closed tender, in the acquisition of the rights must have been communicated openly and simultaneously to broadcasters providing services in both categories,
at the beginning of any negotiation the documentation and/or marketing literature must set out in all material respects the process for negotiating and acquiring the rights and all material terms and conditions, including what rights were available,
if the rights to the listed event were included in a package of rights, the package must not have been more attractive to broadcasters providing services in one of the two categories. Preferably, the rights should be capable of being purchased independently of other rights, e.g. to highlights, delayed transmissions, other events,
the conditions or costs attached to the acquisition of the rights (for example, production costs) must have been clearly stated and must not be preferential to one category of service,
the price sought for the rights must have been fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory as between the two categories of programme service. What is a fair price will depend upon the rights being offered and the value of those rights to broadcasters. A wide range of prices is likely to be regarded as fair but when required to make its own judgment on the matter the ITC will have regard to, inter alia:
previous fees for the event or similar events,
time of day for live coverage of the event,
the revenue or audience potential associated with the live transmission of the event (e.g. the opportunity to sell advertising and sponsorship; the prospects for subscription income),
the period for which rights are offered, and
competition in the market place.
14. A genuine opportunity to acquire the rights also requires that broadcasters are given a reasonable time in which to do so. What constitutes a reasonable time will depend upon the circumstances of each case, including the complexity of negotiations and the production and transmission of the programme surrounding the event, and the proximity of the event to the date on which the rights are offered. The time allowed should give all parties a realistic opportunity to negotiate and reach agreement, but should not be unduly protracted, thereby preventing or restricting broadcasters from complying with this Code.
15. The ITC’s consent is also required where the area for which the service is to be provided does not consist of or include the whole, or substantially the whole, of the area for which the other service is to be provided. In considering whether to give its consent the ITC will take account of the interests of the viewers in the different areas and the transmission coverage areas of the different broadcasters.
16. Consent will normally be given for the full period for which rights are acquired in recognition of the fact that the price paid will, inter alia, reflect the duration of the rights. However, the ITC will revoke its consent if the broadcaster to whom the consent has been given requests it, or if the consent has been given on the basis of false or misleading information. Additionally, the ITC will consider revoking its consent if it appears that rights have been acquired for an extended period in order to circumvent the spirit of the Act. In determining what is an extended period the ITC will have regard to precedents for this and similar events, including the periods for which rights are granted to non-United Kingdom broadcasters for overseas transmissions.
17. For those events listed in Group B in Appendix 1, the ITC will give its consent to exclusive live coverage of an event by a broadcaster providing a service in one category (the first service) if adequate provision has been made for secondary coverage by a broadcaster providing a service in the other category (the second service). The minimum which the ITC will consider to be adequate is where the second service has acquired rights for the provision of edited highlights or delayed coverage amounting to at least 10 % of the scheduled duration of the event (or the play in the event taking place on any on day), subject to a minimum of 30 minutes for an event (or the play in the event on any day) lasting an hour or more, whichever is the greater. For these purposes, where an event has a number of different components taking place concurrently the scheduled duration of the event is defined as the time elapsed between the scheduled beginning of the first component of the event on that day. The second service must have editorial control over the content and scheduling of the edited highlights or delayed coverage except that a restriction may be imposed that the second service shall not begin broadcasting the edited highlights or delayed coverage until a period has elapsed following the scheduled conclusion of the event (or the play in the event on any day). The maximum period which may be set is follows: For an event scheduled to finish Maximum delay After midnight and up to 8 am Edited highlights or delayed coverage to start not later than 10.00 am. Between 8.00 am and 8.30 pm Up to 2 hours. Between 8.30 pm and 10.00 pm Edited highlights or delayed coverage to start not later than 10.30 pm. Between 10.00 pm and midnight Up to 30 minutes.
18. In addition to the above, the right to provide live radio commentary on the event must have been acquired by a radio station with national coverage or an organisation providing a sports service to radio stations which form a national (or near national) network.
19. The situation may arise where a second service is unable or unwilling to provide adequate secondary coverage or any secondary coverage at all. The ITC will then consider whether to give its consent to exclusive live coverage without secondary coverage and the same or similar criteria as set out in paragraphs 12 to 16 will apply.
20. Section 104 also requires the ITC to give guidance on the matters which it will take into account in deciding whether it is unreasonable to expect a television programme provider to comply with the restrictions on broadcasting live coverage of listed events and therefore whether sanctions should be imposed if the restrictions are not observed. Given the long lead times which are generally available for offering, selling and acquiring the rights, the ITC believes that there are very few circumstances in which it would be reasonable for a broadcaster to proceed with exclusive coverage without the ITC’s consent. A broadcaster who proceeds to broadcast a listed event live without the ITC’s consent and where this is not in compliance with Section 101(1) will need to convince the ITC that the period between the rights becoming available and the event taking place was too short for this consent to be obtained or that he believed he had complied but that belief was based on false information. In the latter situation, however, the ITC will need to be convinced that the broadcaster had taken all reasonable steps to satisfy himself that another broadcaster providing a service in the other category had acquired the rights.
21. A request for the ITC’s consent for exclusive live coverage of a listed event must be made in writing to the ITC’s Secretary and be accompanied by full reasons and justification for the request and all relevant supporting information. Requests should be made well in advance (wherever possible, no less than three months) of the event taking place to give the ITC sufficient time to consider whether consent should be given. As a first step in considering the request the ITC will normally issue a public notice inviting any broadcasters providing a service in the other category from the one to which the applicant belongs, or rights holders and other interested parties to comment on the request. Depending on the response and on the ITC’s own investigations into the matter, the applicant may be asked to supply additional information in writing and/or to attend a meeting with ITC staff.
22. Broadcasters should note that under the Act ITC consent is needed for exclusive live coverage of Group B events even if the minimum requirements set out in paragraphs 17 and 18 are met. However, in these circumstances consent will be given automatically.
23. The ITC will respond as quickly as possible to any request. The ITC will publish its decisions and its reasons, but, in doing so, will have regard to the legitimate interest of the parties in the protection of confidentiality.
The Olympic Games
The FIFA World Cup Finals Tournament
The FA Cup Final
The Scottish FA Cup final (in Scotland)
The Grand National
The Derby
The Wimbledon Tennis finals
The European Football Championship finals Tournament
The Rugby League Challenge Cup final (*)
The Rugby World Cup final (*)
APPENDIX 1 UK listed sporting events
Group B Note:
Restrictions apply to rights acquired after 1 October 1996 except for those events marked by an asterisk where the relevant date is 25 November 1997.
Cricket Test matches played in England
Non-finals play in the Wimbledon Tournament
All other matches in the Rugby World Cup Finals Tournament (*)
Five Nations Rugby Tournament matches involving home countries (*)
The Commonwealth Games (*)
The World Athletics Championship (*)
The Cricket World Cup — the final, semi-finals and matches involving home nations’ teams (*)
The Ryder Cup (*)
The Open Golf Championship (*)
APPENDIX 2
[Written answer from the Secretary of State to a Parliamentary Question of Hugh Bayley MP, 25 November 1997] [Written answer from the Secretary of State to a Parliamentary Question of Gareth R. Thomas MP, 25 June 1998]
CHANNEL 3 (ITV)
CHANNEL 4
BBC 1
BBC 2
Culture, media and sport
[Extracts from a communication by the Ministry for Culture, Media and Sports, 25 November 1997] […]
Sports broadcasting
Mr Bayley: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what progress he has made in his review of the sports events listed under Part IV of the Broadcasting Act 1996; and if he will make a statement. Mr Chris Smith: I have consulted interested parties about the principles which should guide the listing process, and I am today publishing criteria which I hope will make the process more transparent. I have also appointed an advisory group of individuals with knowledge of the sporting, broadcasting and public policy issues involved. The members of the group are: I have invited this group to consider the issues against these published criteria: As an initial step in the process of reviewing the list, the rights holders for the events currently listed and a number of the other major sports events are being formally consulted, as the 1996 Act requires. The submissions received from them will be made available to the advisory group. The rights holders for the following events are to be consulted: Events currently listed: Other major sports events: The group may request that other events be included in the review and the rights holders for these events will be consulted. The group will begin its work immediately and I expect it to make its recommendations to me before Easter. I shall then decide what changes, if any, to make to the current list.
Lord Gordon of Strathblane (chairman)
Mr Alastair Burt
Mr Jack Charlton
Mr Steve Cram
Kate Hoey, MP
Mr Michael Parkinson
Mr Clive Sherling
Prof. David Wallace
(a) whether events or parts of events should be removed from the list; and
(b) whether other major sporting events should be added to the list.
The Olympic Games
The FIFA World Cup finals
The FA Cup final
The Scottish FA Cup final (listed only in Scotland)
Cricket Test Matches involving England
Wimbledon Tennis Tournament (finals weekend only currently listed)
The Grand National
The Derby
The Cricket World Cup
The Rugby World Cup
The European Football Championships
The Commonwealth Games
The World Athletics Championship
The British Grand Prix
The Five Nations Rugby Tournament
The Open (golf)
The Ryder Cup
3. The criteria to be used by the review group in their considerations are as follows:
grp_2 Notes for guidance on the listing of major sports events
In considering whether to list an event, the Secretary of State is required to consult the broadcasting regulators and the holders of the rights in question. The following note sets out the factors which the Secretary of State will take into account in deciding whether to list an event. In order to be eligible to be listed, an event must meet the following main criterion: Such an event is likely to fall into one or both of the following categories: An event which satisfies the essential criterion is likely to be considered for listing, but listing of such an event is not automatic. It is more likely to be listed if it exhibits particular characteristics making listing an apt response, such as: In considering whether to list such an event, the Secretary of State will have regard to other factors affecting the likely costs and benefits to the sport concerned, to the broadcasting industry and to viewers, such as: In considering events for listing, the Secretary of State will have regard to these other factors cumulatively. No single factor automatically commands listing as a response, nor does failure to meet an individual criterion disqualify an event from consideration.
the event has a special national resonance, not simply a significance to those who ordinarily follow the sport concerned; it is an event which serves to unite the nation; a shared point in the national calendar.
it is a pre-eminent national or international event in the sport,
it involves the national team or national representatives in the sport concerned.
it is likely to command a large television audience,
it has a history of being broadcast live on free-to-air services.
whether it is practical to offer full live coverage on a general channel — extended events such as season-long championships involving many matches will not normally be listed in their entirety,
the impact of listing in reducing the income or potential income of the sport, and the consequences of that reduction for its investment in increasing participation and/or improving levels of performance and/or in creating safe facilities,
the likely impact of listing on the broadcasting market, including future investment in sports broadcasting, the level of competition and the position of public service broadcasters,
whether there are arrangements to ensure that access to the event is available to all viewers by means of highlights, delayed coverage and/or radio commentary.
4. The Secretary of State made his announcement in a Written Answer to a Parliamentary Question from Hugh Bayley MP (City of York).
Listed sporting events
Mr Gareth R. Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport if he will make a statement about the outcome of his review of major events listed under Part IV of the Broadcasting Act 1996. Mr Chris Smith: My review of the list is now complete. I have conducted it in the light of the criteria which I published last year. I consulted widely on the criteria and the content of the list and I have carefully considered the many representations made to me. I have accepted the general principles of the report produced by the Advisory Group chaired by Lord Gordon of Strathblane. With immediate effect, I am revising the list of events under Part IV of the Broadcasting Act 1996. I am retaining the following events on the list, requiring live coverage to be made available to free-to-air terrestrial television broadcasters (in Category A as specified in the 1996 Act): I am adding the following events to the list on the same basis: After careful consideration of the Advisory Group’s recommendations, I have concluded that a number of the matches in the World Cup and European Championships football qualifying tournaments meet the criteria for listing. I believe that it is important that crucial ties in these competitions should be available to all viewers and therefore intend to seek Europe-wide arrangements for protecting free-to-air live broadcasts of crucial matches in these competitions. I am also listing some further events on a different understanding. For these events, I have recommended to the Independent Television Commission that live coverage might be allowed to be shown exclusively by a Category B broadcaster (as specified in the 1996 Act), provided there are satisfactory arrangements for secondary coverage by a Category A broadcaster. I have asked the ITC to consider setting a minimum acceptable standard for such secondary coverage, to include some combination of delayed full coverage, highlights and live radio commentary. The events I am listing on this understanding are:
The Olympic Games
The FIFA World Cup Finals Tournament
The FA Cup final
The Scottish FA Cup final (in Scotland)
The Grand National
The Derby
The Wimbledon Tennis finals.
The European Football Championship Finals Tournament
The Rugby League Challenge Cup final
The Rugby World Cup final.
Cricket Test Matches played in England
Non-finals play in the Wimbledon Tournament
All other matches in the Rugby World Cup Finals Tournament
Five Nations Rugby Tournament matches involving home countries
The Commonwealth Games
The World Athletics Championship
The Cricket World Cup — the final, semi-finals and matches involving home nations teams
The Ryder Cup
The Open Golf Championship.
Versions
Cited by
- Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) 18 July 2013 Judgment · Grade B
By its appeal, the Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) requests the Court of Justice to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Case T-55/08 UEFA v Commission [2011] ECR II-271 (the judgment under appeal), by which the General Court dismissed its application for annulment in part of Commission Decision 2007/730/EC of 16 October 2007 on the compatibility with Community law of measures taken by the United Kingdom pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or admini
- Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2013 — Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) v European Commission, Kingdom of Belgium, and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Case C-201/11 P) Notice · Grade B
AppealsTelevision broadcastingDirective 89/552/EECArticle 3aMeasures taken by the United Kingdom concerning events of major importance for the society of that Member StateEuropean Football ChampionshipDecision declaring the measures compatible with European Union lawStatement of reasonsArticles 49 EC and 86 ECRight to property2013/C 260/03Language of the case: English Appellant: Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) (represented by: D. Anderson QC, and D. Piccinin, Barrister, instructed by B. Keane and T. McQuail, Solicitors) Other parties to the proceedings: European Commissio
- Action brought on 6 February 2008 — FIFA v Commission Notice · Grade B
Annulment, in whole or in part, of the Commission Decision 2007/730/EC of 16 October 2007 on the compatibility with Community law of measures taken by the United Kingdom pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities, in particular Articles 1-3 thereof in so far as it concerns the FIFA World Cup™;
- Action brought on 6 February 2008 — FIFA v Commission Notice · Grade B
Under Article 3a of Council Directive 89/552/EEC a Member State may draw up a list of sporting or other events that are considered to be events of major importance to society. The events on the list cannot be the subject of exclusive broadcasting rights which prevent a substantial proportion of the public in that Member State from watching the event via live coverage or deferred coverage on free television. The applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision 2007/730/EC of 16 October 2007 by which the Commission declared that the list drawn up by the United Kingdom pursuant to Article 3a(
- Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2011 — FIFA v Commission (Case T-68/08) Notice · Grade B
Television broadcastingArticle 3a of Directive 89/552/EECMeasures taken by the United Kingdom concerning events of major importance to United Kingdom societyFootball World CupDecision declaring the measures compatible with Community lawStatement of reasonsArticles 43 EC, 49 EC and 86 ECRight to property2011/C 103/35Language of the case: English Applicant: Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) (Zurich, Switzerland) (represented by: initially by E. Batchelor, F. Young, Solicitors, A. Barav, D. Reymond, lawyers and F. Carlin, Barrister, and subsequently by E. Batchelor, A. Bara
- Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 December 2012 Cases C-201/11 P, C-204/11 P and C-205/11 P Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v European Commission Opinion · Grade B
In Case C-201/11 P, the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) requests the Court of Justice to set aside the judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2011 in Case T-55/08 UEFA v Commission, by which the General Court confirmed the validity of Decision 2007/730/EC in which the Commission approved the inclusion of the entire UEFA European Football Championship (the EURO) on the national list of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
- Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 December 2012 Cases C-201/11 P, C-204/11 P and C-205/11 P Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v European Commission Opinion · Grade B
In Case C-205/11 P, FIFA requests the Court of Justice to set aside the judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2011 in Case T-68/08 FIFA v Commission, by which the General Court confirmed the validity of Decision 2007/730 in which the Commission approved the inclusion of the entire World Cup on the national list of the United Kingdom.
- Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 December 2012 Cases C-201/11 P, C-204/11 P and C-205/11 P Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v European Commission Opinion · Grade B
By its judgment in UEFA v Commission, the General Court rejected all of the pleas in law raised by UEFA against Decision 2007/730. By the judgments in Case T-385/07 FIFA v Commission and Case T-68/08 FIFA v Commission, the General Court rejected all of the pleas in law raised by FIFA against Decision 2007/479 and Decision 2007/730, respectively.
- Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 December 2012 Cases C-201/11 P, C-204/11 P and C-205/11 P Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v European Commission Opinion · Grade B
By its appeal in Case C-201/11 P, lodged at the Registry of the Court on 27 April 2011, UEFA requests the Court to set aside the judgment in UEFA v Commission, to partially annul Decision 2007/730 and to order the Commission to pay the costs. By its appeals in Cases C-204/11 P and C-205/11 P, lodged at the Registry of the Court on 28 April 2012, FIFA requests the Court to uphold, as regards admissibility, the judgments in Case T-385/07 FIFA v Commission and Case T-68/08 FIFA v Commission; to set aside those judgments in so far as they respectively approve the inclusion of the non-prime matches
- Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 December 2012 Cases C-201/11 P, C-204/11 P and C-205/11 P Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v European Commission Opinion · Grade B
Furthermore, it must be stated that, without presenting a precise and detailed line of argument as regards the error allegedly vitiating the General Court’s reasoning, and merely citing a lone paragraph of the judgment in Commission v UEFA, UEFA in essence repeats the criticisms which it previously raised at first instance against Decision 2007/730 before the General Court, claiming that the United Kingdom’s Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport rejected the convergent opinions of several advisory groups in the procedure which it carried out. Moreover, UEFA indicates that, in its vie
- Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 December 2012 Cases C-201/11 P, C-204/11 P and C-205/11 P Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v European Commission Opinion · Grade B
Secondly, as regards the alleged substitution of reasons, UEFA criticises the validation of the unitary nature of the EURO by the General Court in paragraph 103 of the judgment in UEFA v Commission, in that the General Court relied for that purpose on entirely new factual evidence – set out in paragraphs 126 to 135 of the judgment – which was not considered in Decision 2007/730.
- Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 December 2012 Cases C-201/11 P, C-204/11 P and C-205/11 P Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v European Commission Opinion · Grade B
First of all, for the reasons set out in points 14 to 25 of the present Opinion, concerning the interpretation of Article 3a of Directive 89/552 as amended, I propose that the Court hold that the General Court was correct in finding that the Commission duly fulfilled its duty of verification as regards Decision 2007/730. Moreover, it is by its definitive assessment of the factual and legal circumstances – without being exposed to the unfounded complaints in the grounds of appeal raised against its judgment – that the General Court correctly applied the case-law relating to the justification of
- Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 December 2012 Cases C-201/11 P, C-204/11 P and C-205/11 P Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v European Commission Opinion · Grade B
UEFA’s fifth ground of appeal alleges failure to state reasons. UEFA claims that the reasoning of Decision 2007/730, held to be sufficient by the General Court, was extremely limited in comparison with the reasoning required of the Commission for decisions of a similar character. Accordingly, the General Court erred in law in failing to hold the Commission to the required standard of reasoning in respect of each of the four substantive issues raised in the appeal. In that regard, UEFA specifies the alleged errors in the validity of the reasons set out by the Commission.
- Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 December 2012 Cases C-201/11 P, C-204/11 P and C-205/11 P Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v European Commission Opinion · Grade B
According to UEFA, that decision must be annulled, first, because it did not provide sufficient reasons with respect to the characterisation of the EURO as an event of major importance for society. Secondly, as regards the reasons stated in Decision 2007/730 concerning competition, the General Court should not have held, in paragraph 71 of its judgment, that it was sufficient for Decision 2007/730 to state – without providing reasons – that the United Kingdom measures would allow actual and potential competition for the acquisition of the rights to broadcast these events.
- Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 December 2012 Cases C-201/11 P, C-204/11 P and C-205/11 P Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v European Commission Opinion · Grade B
At the outset, it must be noted that the criticisms made by UEFA in the present ground of appeal concern, for the most part, possible defects in the statement of reasons for Decision 2007/730, which are mixed with certain criticisms of the judgment in UEFA v Commission. Thus, the arguments put forward by UEFA in that part of the fifth ground of appeal concerning the defects of Decision 2007/730 constitute a request for re-examination of a plea raised before the General Court, which the Court of Justice does not have jurisdiction to undertake. Those pleas must therefore be considered clearly in
- Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 December 2012 Cases C-201/11 P, C-204/11 P and C-205/11 P Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v European Commission Opinion · Grade B
Accordingly, as regards the grounds of the judgment in UEFA v Commission concerning competition, in paragraphs 71 to 73 of that judgment the General Court clearly set out the reasons why the statement of reasons for Decision 2007/730 – which, moreover, and contrary to what is claimed by UEFA, includes a reference to compatibility with competition law – was sufficient and allowed UEFA to understand the Commission’s reasoning and the General Court to exercise its power of review.
- Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 December 2012 Cases C-201/11 P, C-204/11 P and C-205/11 P Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v European Commission Opinion · Grade B
As regards the grounds of the judgment in UEFA v Commission concerning the freedom to provide services, it must be stated that, in paragraph 70 of that judgment, the General Court in fact held that, in the light of the statement of reasons for Decision 2007/730, UEFA was in a position to assess whether there are factors which may … potentially show that it is disproportionate … to include all EURO matches in the list. In that regard, it is sufficient to point out that this passage must be read in the light of paragraph 62 of the judgment, in which the General Court correctly cited the Court of
- Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 December 2012 Cases C-201/11 P, C-204/11 P and C-205/11 P Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v European Commission Opinion · Grade B
Finally, as regards inadequacy of the reasoning in respect of infringement of the right to property, I note that the General Court not only accepted – too readily in my view – that UEFA’s right is affected by Decision 2007/730, but also analysed the compatibility of such a restriction with the principles of European Union law in responding to the sixth plea raised at first instance. In the light of the response which I propose be given to UEFA’s fourth ground of appeal, the examination of this complaint is unnecessary.
- Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 December 2012 Cases C-201/11 P, C-204/11 P and C-205/11 P Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v European Commission Opinion · Grade B
As regards, first, the judgment in Case T-385/07 FIFA v Commission, concerning Decision 2007/479 relating to the measures adopted by the Kingdom of Belgium, and, secondly, the judgment in Case T-68/08 FIFA v Commission, concerning Decision 2007/730 relating to the measures adopted by the United Kingdom, FIFA claims that the reasoning in those judgments is contradictory, inconsistent and inadequate as regards whether the World Cup should be considered a single event of major importance for society. First of all, in various statements the General Court provided inconsistent reasoning as regards
- Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 December 2012 Cases C-201/11 P, C-204/11 P and C-205/11 P Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v European Commission Opinion · Grade B
Moreover, FIFA submits that the General Court’s reasoning in the judgments in Case T-385/07 FIFA v Commission and T-68/08 FIFA v Commission amounts to an unlawful reversal of the burden of proof. Finally, by giving reasons not contained in Decision 2007/479 and Decision 2007/730, the General Court exceeded the ambit of judicial review.