Commission Decision of 2 December 2008 accepting the undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of citric acid originating in the People's Republic of China (2008/899/EC)
Grade B
mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.
Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/decision/2008/899@2008-12-02/en
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (the basic Regulation), and in particular Articles 8 and 9 thereof,
After consulting the Advisory Committee,
Whereas: PROCEDURE
(1) By Regulation (EC) No 488/2008, the Commission imposed provisional anti-dumping duties on imports into the Community of citric acid originating in the People's Republic of China (PRC).
(2) Following the adoption of the provisional anti-dumping measures, the Commission continued the investigation of dumping, injury and Community interest. The definitive findings and conclusions of the investigation are set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 1193/2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of citric acid originating in the PRC.
(3) The investigation confirmed the provisional findings of injurious dumping relating to imports of citric acid originating in the PRC.
UNDERTAKINGS
(4) Subsequent to the adoption of provisional anti-dumping measures, six cooperating exporting producers in the PRC, namely Anhui BBCA Biochemical, RZBC, TTCA, Yixing Union Biochemical, Laiwu Taihe Biochemistry and Weifang Ensign Industry offered price undertakings in accordance with Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation. In these undertakings, the exporting producers have offered to sell the product concerned at or above price levels which eliminate the injurious effects of dumping. Each exporting producer offered one minimum import price for all different product types in order to limit the risk of circumvention.
(5) In addition, the offers provide for the indexation of the minimum prices given that the prices of the product concerned varied significantly, in particular prices increased considerably after the investigation period. The indexation is made in accordance with public international quotations of corn, the main raw material used by the exporting producers. However, the exporting producers offered to fix the minimum prices at least at the level of the non-injurious price even if the indexation would lead to a lower price level.
(6) Laiwu Taihe Biochemistry, which was accorded market economy treatment, offered to calculate its minimum price based on the normal value established during the investigation.
(7) Moreover, the exporting producers, in order to reduce the risk of price violations by means of cross-compensation of prices, firstly offered to report all non-EU sales to those customers whose organisation or structure extends beyond the EU, should the exporting producer sell to this customer in the EU. Secondly, the exporting producers agreed to respect a certain price regime in relation to those non-EU sales.
(8) The exporting producers will also provide the Commission with regular and detailed information concerning their exports to the Community, meaning that the undertakings can be monitored effectively by the Commission.
(9) It is also noted that the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (CCCMC) is joining the six companies mentioned in recital (4), and that therefore the CCCMC will also play an active role in the monitoring of the undertakings. Thus, the Commission considers the risk of circumventing the agreed undertakings as limited.
(10) Subsequent to the disclosure of the undertaking offers, the Community industry objected to these undertaking offers. The Community industry argued that an indexation based on corn is not appropriate as other main inputs constitute major variant components of the costs and suggested instead an indexation based on both raw material and energy costs. As concerns the Community industry's comments suggesting an indexation based also on energy, it is noted that energy is not a major cost driver. Moreover, there would be no clear source of indexation as the energy required can be produced from different sources such as coal, natural gas or electricity.
(11) The Community industry further argued that, because the exporting producers sell the product covered by the undertaking to multinational companies, there is a high risk of price cross-compensation i.e. the product covered by the undertaking may be sold to the same customer at artificially low prices outside the EC in order to compensate the minimum prices in the EC. In this regard it should be noted that the majority of the companies' export sales to the EC are made to traders and not to multinational companies. Notwithstanding this, and to further reduce the remaining risk of cross-compensation by some specific companies, the offers contain special cross-compensation clauses in respect of sales by the companies concerned to those EC customers whose organisation or structure extends beyond the EU. These clauses significantly reduce the risk of cross-compensation.
(12) In view of this, the undertakings offered by the exporting producers are acceptable.
(13) In order to enable the Commission to monitor effectively the companies' compliance with the undertakings, when the request for release for free circulation is presented to the relevant customs authority, exemption from the anti-dumping duty will be conditional on (i) the presentation of an undertaking invoice containing at least the elements listed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1193/2008; (ii) the fact that imported goods are manufactured, shipped and invoiced directly by the said company to the first independent customer in the Community; and (iii) the fact that the goods declared and presented to customs correspond precisely to the description on the undertaking invoice. Where no such invoice is presented, or when it does not correspond to the product presented to customs, the appropriate rate of anti-dumping duty shall instead be payable.
(14) To further ensure the respect of the undertakings, importers have been made aware by the above-mentioned Council Regulation that the non-fulfillment of the conditions provided for by that Regulation, or the withdrawal by the Commission of the acceptance of the undertakings, may lead to the customs debt being incurred for the relevant transactions.
(15) In the event of a breach or withdrawal of the undertaking or in case of withdrawal of acceptance of the undertaking by the Commission, the anti-dumping duty imposed in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation shall automatically apply by means of Article 8(9) of the basic Regulation,
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Article 1
The undertakings offered by the exporting producers mentioned below together with the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters, in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of citric acid originating in the People's Republic of China, are hereby accepted. Country Company Taric Additional Code People's Republic of China Anhui BBCA Biochemical Co., Ltd — No 73 Daqing Road, Bengbu City 233010, Anhui Province A874 Manufactured by RZBC Co., Ltd — No 9 Xinghai West Road, Rizhao, Shandong Province and sold by its related sales company RZBC Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd — No 9 Xinghai West Road, Rizhao, Shandong Province A926 Manufactured by RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd — West Wing, Chengyang North Road, Ju County, Rizhao, Shandong Province and sold by its related sales company RZBC Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd — No 9 Xinghai West Road, Rizhao, Shandong Province A927 TTCA Co., Ltd. — West, Wenhe Bridge North, Anqiu City, Shandong Province A878 Yixing Union Biochemical Co., Ltd — Economic Development Zone Yixing City 214203, Jiangsu Province A879 Laiwu Taihe Biochemistry Co. Ltd, No 106 Luzhong Large East Street, Laiwu, Shandong Province A880 Weifang Ensign Industry Co. Ltd, The West End, Limin Road, Changle City, Shandong Province A882
Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Done at Brussels, 2 December 2008. For the Commission Catherine Ashton Member of the Commission
Versions
Cited by
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/704 of 11 May 2016 withdrawing the acceptance of the undertaking for two exporting producers and amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/87 accepting the undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of citric acid originating in the People's Republic of China Regulation · Grade B
The European Commission (the Commission) accepted price undertakings offered, inter alia, by Weifang Ensign Industry Co., Ltd (Taric additional code A882) (Weifang) and TTCA Co., Ltd (Taric additional code A878) (TTCA), together with the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals and Chemicals Importers and Exporters (the Chamber) by Decision 2008/899/EC.
- Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/87 of 21 January 2015 accepting the undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of citric acid originating in the People's Republic of China Decision · Grade B
It is noted that the measures in force have the form of undertakings for five exporting producers including a group of exporting producers which were accepted by the Commission Decision 2008/899/EC (undertakings currently in force).
- Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/87 of 21 January 2015 accepting the undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of citric acid originating in the People's Republic of China Decision · Grade B
Decision 2008/899/EC is hereby repealed.
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1193/2008 of 1 December 2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duties imposed on imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China Regulation · Grade B
The Commission, by Decision 2008/899/EC, accepted these undertaking offers. The Council recognises that the undertaking offers eliminate the injurious effect of dumping and limits to a sufficient degree the risk of circumvention.
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1193/2008 of 1 December 2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duties imposed on imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China Regulation · Grade B
Imports declared for release into free circulation which are invoiced by companies from which undertakings are accepted by the Commission and whose names are listed in Decision 2008/899/EC, as from time to time amended, shall be exempt from the anti-dumping duty imposed by Article 1, on condition that:
- Council Regulation (EC) No 1193/2008 of 1 December 2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duties imposed on imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China Regulation · Grade B
The name of the official of the company that has issued the commercial invoice and the following signed declaration: I, the undersigned, certify that the sale for direct export to the European Community of the goods covered by this invoice is being made within the scope and under the terms of the Undertaking offered by [COMPANY], and accepted by the European Commission through Decision 2008/899/EC. I declare that the information provided in this invoice is complete and correct.
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/2180 of 16 October 2023 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/607 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China as extended to imports of citric acid consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not, following a new exporter review pursuant to Article 11(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council Regulation · Grade B
By Decision 2008/899/EC the European Commission (the Commission), accepted price undertakings offered by six Chinese exporting producers (including a group of exporting producers) together with the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (CCCMC).
- Commission Decision of 7 September 2012 amending Decision 2008/899/EC accepting the undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China (2012/501/EU) Decision · Grade B
The Commission, by Decision 2008/899/EC (the Decision), accepted a price undertaking (the undertaking), inter alia, from Laiwu Taihe Biochemistry Co. Ltd (Laiwu Taihe) together with the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (CCCMC).
- Commission Decision of 7 September 2012 amending Decision 2008/899/EC accepting the undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China (2012/501/EU) Decision · Grade B
AMENDMENT OF DECISION 2008/899/EC
- Commission Decision of 7 September 2012 amending Decision 2008/899/EC accepting the undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China (2012/501/EU) Decision · Grade B
Therefore, in accordance with Article 8(9) of the basic Regulation and also in accordance with the relevant clauses of the undertaking authorising the Commission to unilaterally withdraw the undertaking, the Commission has concluded that the acceptance of the undertaking offered by Laiwu Taihe together with CCCMC should be withdrawn and Decision 2008/899/EC should be amended. Accordingly, the definitive anti-dumping duties imposed by Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1193/2008 on imports of the product concerned produced by Laiwu Taihe (Taric additional code A880) should apply,
- Commission Decision of 7 September 2012 amending Decision 2008/899/EC accepting the undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China (2012/501/EU) Decision · Grade B
The table of Article 1 in Decision 2008/899/EC is replaced by the following table: Country Companies Taric additional code People’s Republic of China COFCO Biochemical (Anhui) Co., Ltd — No 73 Daquing Road, Bengbu City 233010, Anhui Province A874 Manufactured by RZBC Co., Ltd — No 9 Xinghai West Road, Rizhao, Shandong Province and sold by its related sales company RZBC Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd — No 66, Lvzhou South Road, Rizhao (Liangyou Grand View Hotel, 22nd Floor, Building A), Shandong Province A926 Manufactured by RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd — West Wing, Chengyang North Road, Ju County, Rizhao, Sha
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/738 of 1 March 2024 withdrawing the acceptance of the undertaking for all exporting producers, amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/607 and repealing the Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/87 accepting the undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China Regulation · Grade B
By Decision 2008/899/EC, the European Commission (the Commission), accepted price undertakings offered by six Chinese exporting producers (including a group of exporting producers) together with the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (CCCMC). The producers were Anhui BBCA Biochemical Co., Ltd. (now COFCO Bio-Chemical Energy (Yushu) Co., Ltd.); Laiwu Taihe Biochemistry Co., Ltd.; RZBC Co., Ltd. and RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd.; TTCA Co., Ltd.; Weifang Ensign Industry Co., Ltd.; and Yixing Union Biochemical Co., Ltd. (now Jiangsu Guoxin Union Energy Co., L
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/738 of 1 March 2024 withdrawing the acceptance of the undertaking for all exporting producers, amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/607 and repealing the Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/87 accepting the undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China Regulation · Grade B
Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/87 and Decision 2008/899/EC are hereby repealed.
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/607 of 14 April 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China as extended to imports of citric acid consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council Regulation · Grade B
By Decision 2008/899/EC the European Commission (the Commission), accepted price undertakings offered by six Chinese exporting producers (including a group of exporting producers) together with the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters (CCCMC). The producers were Anhui BBCA Biochemical Co., Ltd. (now COFCO Bio-Chemical Energy (Yushu) Co., Ltd.); Laiwu Taihe Biochemistry Co., Ltd.; RZBC Co., Ltd. and RZBC (Juxian) Co., Ltd.; TTCA Co., Ltd.; Weifang Ensign Industry Co., Ltd. and Yixing Union Biochemical Co., Ltd. (now Jiangsu Guoxin Union Energy Co., Ltd
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/607 of 14 April 2021 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China as extended to imports of citric acid consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council Regulation · Grade B
Imports declared for release into free circulation which are invoiced by companies from which undertakings are accepted by the Commission and whose names are listed in Decision 2008/899/EC, further amended by Decision 2012/501/EU and Regulation (EU) 2016/704, shall be exempt from the anti-dumping duty imposed by Article 1, on condition that:
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/82 of 21 January 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of citric acid originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 and of partial interim reviews pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 Regulation · Grade B
The European Commission (the Commission), by Decision 2008/899/EC accepted price undertakings offered by six Chinese exporting producers (including a group of exporting producers) together with the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters.
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/32 of 14 January 2016 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/82 on imports of citric acid originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of citric acid consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not Regulation · Grade B
The European Commission (the Commission), by Decision 2008/899/EC accepted the price undertakings offered by seven Chinese exporting producers or group of exporting producers together with the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters.