Commission Decision of 13 May 2009 on the selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) (notified under document number C(2009) 3746) (2009/449/EC)
Grade B
mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.
Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/decision/2009/449@2009-05-13/en
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Decision No 626/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2008 on the selection and authorisation of systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS), and in particular Article 5 thereof,
Whereas:
(1) In order to facilitate the development of a competitive internal market for mobile satellite services (MSS) across the Community and to ensure gradual coverage in all Member States, Decision No 626/2008/EC creates a Community procedure for the common selection of operators of mobile satellite systems that use the 2 GHz frequency band in accordance with Commission Decision 2007/98/EC, comprising radio spectrum from 1980 to 2010 MHz for earth to space communications, and from 2170 to 2200 MHz for space to earth communications.
(2) The Commission published a call for applications for pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) (2008/C 201/03) on 7 August 2008. The deadline of 7 October 2008 was set for the submission of applications.
(3) Applications from ICO Satellite Limited, Inmarsat Ventures Limited, Solaris Mobile Limited and TerreStar Europe Limited were received within the deadline.
(4) On 24 October 2008 requests for additional information regarding the fulfilment of admissibility requirements were sent to ICO Satellite Limited, Inmarsat Ventures Limited and TerreStar Europe Limited. All the three applicants responded by 7 November 2008.
(5) By Decision C(2008) 8123 of 11 December 2008 on the admissibility of applications submitted in response to the call for applications for pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) (2008/C 201/03) the Commission decided that the four applications submitted by, respectively, ICO Satellite Limited, Inmarsat Ventures Limited, Solaris Mobile Limited and TerreStar Europe Limited are admissible. The Decision was forthwith notified to the applicants, and the list of admissible applicants was published on the Commission website.
(6) Information regarding the completion of the critical design review was provided, in addition to the application, by ICO Satellite Limited, Inmarsat Ventures Limited and TerreStar Europe Limited no later than 80 working days after the submission of their application (by 6 February 2009), in accordance with the Annex to Decision No 626/2008/EC.
(7) Moreover, correspondence including additions to the technical or operational content of the application was provided by TerreStar Europe Limited and ICO Satellite Limited after the deadlines for submission of the application and for submission of information regarding the completion of the critical design review, and could therefore not be taken into account.
(8) In the first selection phase the Commission should assess, within 40 working days following publication of the list of admissible applicants, whether applicants have demonstrated the required level of technical and commercial development of their respective mobile satellite systems. Such assessment should be based on the satisfactory completion of milestones one to five as set out in the Annex to Decision No 626/2008/EC. The credibility of applicants and the viability of the proposed mobile satellite systems should be taken into account throughout the first selection phase.
(9) To facilitate the implementation of the comparative selection procedure, and in particular in order to assist the Commission in preparing decisions connected with the selection procedure, a working group of the Communications Committee on the comparative selection procedure for pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) was established.
(10) For the analysis and evaluation of applications in the first selection phase, the Commission sought the advice and assistance of external experts, selected through a competitive tendering procedure on the basis of their expertise and high level of independence and impartiality.
(11) Following a detailed analysis, and comprehensive deliberations in meetings, a consolidated report including conclusions on the completion of the milestones was produced by the experts and communicated to the Commission.
(12) The conclusions of the first-phase evaluation by the external experts were discussed by the experts of Member States in the framework of the working group of the Communications Committee on the comparative selection procedure for pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS). The outcome of these discussions was presented and discussed in the Communications Committee.
(13) The Commission took into account the consolidated report of the external experts as well as the opinion of the Member States′ experts expressed in the working group on the comparative selection procedure for pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) for the purposes of the first selection phase assessment.
(14) The outcome of the Commission′s assessment is that Inmarsat Ventures Limited and Solaris Mobile Limited have demonstrated the required level of technical and commercial development of their respective mobile satellite systems and should be eligible applicants, while ICO Satellite Limited and TerreStar Europe Limited have not demonstrated the required level of technical and commercial development of their respective mobile satellite systems and should not be eligible applicants.
(15) Milestone one is entitled Submission of International Telecommunications Union (ITU) request for coordination and requires that the applicant provide clear evidence that the administration responsible for the ITU filing of a mobile satellite system to be used for the provision of commercial MSS within the territories of the Member States has submitted the relevant ITU Radio Regulations Appendix 4 information. All the four applications contained clear evidence in this regard, which led the Commission to consider that this milestone had been satisfactorily completed by all four applicants.
(16) Milestone two is entitled Satellite manufacturing and requires that the applicant provide clear evidence of a binding agreement for the manufacture of the satellites required for the provision of commercial MSS within the territories of the Member States. The document shall identify the construction milestones leading to the completion of manufacture of satellites required for the provision of commercial MSS. The document shall be signed by the applicant and the satellite manufacturing company. The applications of Inmarsat Ventures Limited and Solaris Mobile Limited were supported by clear evidence in this regard, which led the Commission to consider that this milestone had been satisfactorily completed by these applicants.
(17) Milestone three is entitled Satellite launch agreement and requires that the applicant provide clear evidence of a binding agreement to launch the minimum number of satellites required for the continuous provision of commercial MSS within the territories of the Member States. The document shall identify the launch dates and launch services and the contractual terms and conditions concerning indemnity. The document shall be signed by the mobile satellite system operator and the satellite launching company. All the four applications were supported by clear evidence in this regard, which led the Commission to consider that this milestone had been satisfactorily completed by all four applicants.
(18) Milestone four is entitled Gateway earth stations and requires that the applicant provide clear evidence of a binding agreement for the construction and installation of gateway earth stations that would be used for the provision of commercial MSS within the territories of the Member States. All the four applications were supported by clear evidence in this regard, which led the Commission to consider that this milestone had been satisfactorily completed by all four applicants.
(19) Milestone five is entitled Completion of the critical design review. Critical design review is defined as the stage in the spacecraft implementation process at which the design and development phase ends and the manufacturing phase starts. The milestone requires that the applicant provide clear evidence of the completion, no later than 80 working days after the submission of the application, of the critical design review in accordance with the construction milestones indicated in the satellite manufacturing agreement. The relevant document shall be signed by the satellite manufacturing company and shall indicate the date of the completion of the critical design review. The applications of ICO Satellite Limited, Inmarsat Ventures Limited and Solaris Mobile Limited were supported by clear evidence in this regard, which led the Commission to consider that this milestone had been satisfactorily completed by these applicants.
(20) As regards milestone two […]. […] lack of contractual and up-to-date evidence for the construction milestones leading to the completion of manufacture of the satellites required for the provision of commercial MSS led the Commission to consider, in accordance with Article 5(1) of Decision No 626/2008/EC, that this milestone had not been satisfactorily completed by ICO Satellite Limited.
(21) […] The inconsistency between the information provided in the application and the information in relation to the critical design review provided subsequently, and the lack of clear evidence of the completion of the critical design review for the satellite referred to in the satellite manufacturing agreement as included in the application, led the Commission to consider, in accordance with Article 5(1) of Decision No 626/2008/EC, that milestone five in conjunction with milestone two had not been satisfactorily completed by TerreStar Europe Limited.
(22) Inmarsat Ventures Limited requested in its application 15 MHz of spectrum for earth to space communications and 15 MHz of spectrum for space to earth communications. Solaris Mobile Limited requested in its application 15 MHz of spectrum for earth to space communications and 15 MHz of spectrum for space to earth communications.
(23) Since the combined demand for radio spectrum requested by Inmarsat Ventures Limited and Solaris Mobile Limited does not exceed the amount of radio spectrum available identified in Article 1(1) of Decision No 626/2008/EC, the two applicants should be selected in accordance with Article 5(2) of Decision No 626/2008/EC.
(24) Any selection decision adopted as a result of the first selection phase should identify the respective frequencies which each selected applicant shall be authorised to use, in each Member State, in accordance with Title III of Decision No 626/2008/EC.
(25) The frequencies should be identified on the basis of objective, transparent, non-discriminatory, and proportionate criteria. In this regard, the principle of effective management of radio frequencies, as enshrined in Article 9 of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive), should apply. In accordance with this principle, the two times 30 MHz to be used should be divided into contiguous sub-bands of equal bandwidth for both earth to space communications (the uplink) and space to earth communications (the downlink) in order to allow the most efficient use of the sub-bands. The lower pair of sub-bands should consist of 1980-1995 MHz for earth to space communications (the uplink) and of 2170-2185 MHz for space to earth communications (the downlink); the upper pair of sub-bands should consist of 1995-2010 MHz for the uplink and of 2185-2200 MHz for the downlink. As required in Section 4.4 of the call for applications 2008/C 201/03, the Commission has taken into account the indications of preferences of the eligible applicants as provided in their applications. […].
(26) Within 30 working days of the publication of the list of selected applicants, those applicants that intend not to use the radio frequencies should inform the Commission thereof in writing.
(27) According to Article 7 of Decision No 626/2008/EC, Member States shall ensure that the selected applicants, in accordance with the time-frame and the service area to which the selected applicants have committed themselves, in accordance with Article 4(1)(c), and in accordance with national and Community law, have the right to use the specific radio frequency identified in the Commission decision adopted pursuant to Articles 5(2) or 6(3) and the right to operate a mobile satellite system. They shall inform selected applicants of those rights accordingly. Decision No 626/2008/EC also stipulates that the right to use the specific radio frequencies should be granted to the selected applicants as soon as possible after their selection, in accordance with Article 5(3) of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive).
(28) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Communications Committee delivered on 2 April 2009,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
ICO Satellite Limited and TerreStar Europe Limited are not eligible applicants as a result of the first selection phase of the comparative selection procedure provided in Title II of Decision No 626/2008/EC.
Article 2
Inmarsat Ventures Limited and Solaris Mobile Limited are eligible applicants as a result of the first selection phase of the comparative selection procedure provided in Title II of Decision No 626/2008/EC. As the combined demand for radio spectrum requested by the eligible applicants retained as a result of the first selection phase of the comparative selection procedure provided in Title II of Decision No 626/2008/EC does not exceed the amount of radio spectrum available identified in Article 1(1) of Decision No 626/2008/EC, Inmarsat Ventures Limited and Solaris Mobile Limited are selected.
Article 3
The frequencies which each selected applicant shall be authorised to use in each Member State in accordance with Title III of Decision No 626/2008/EC shall be the following:
(a) Inmarsat Ventures Limited: from 1980 to 1995 MHz for earth to space communications and from 2170 to 2185 MHz for space to earth communications;
(b) Solaris Mobile Limited: from 1995 to 2010 MHz for earth to space communications and from 2185 to 2200 MHz for space to earth communications.
Article 4
The selection of Inmarsat Ventures Limited and Solaris Mobile Limited and the identification to the selected applicants of the respective frequencies provided for by Articles 2 and 3 is conditional upon no information in writing being provided, within 30 working days of the publication of the list of selected applicants by the Commission, by the relevant selected applicant to the effect that the applicant intends not to use the radio frequencies identified.
Article 5
This Decision is addressed:
1. to the Member States; and
(a) to ICO Satellite Limited, 269 Argyll Avenue, Slough SL1 4HE, United Kingdom;
(b) to Inmarsat Ventures Limited, 99 City Road, London EC1Y 1AX, United Kingdom;
(c) to Solaris Mobile Limited, 30 Upper Pembroke Street, Dublin 2, Ireland;
(d) to TerreStar Europe Limited, c/o TerreStar Global Ltd, 2nd Floor, 145-157 St John Street, London EC1V 4PY, United Kingdom.
Done at Brussels, 13 May 2009. For the Commission Viviane Reding Member of the Commission
Versions
Cited by
- Commission Decision of 10 October 2011 on modalities for coordinated application of the rules on enforcement with regard to mobile satellite services (MSS) pursuant to Article 9(3) of Decision No 626/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document C(2011) 7001) (Text with EEA relevance) (2011/667/EU) Decision · Grade B
Commission Decision 2009/449/EC of 13 May 2009 on the selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) lists the selected operators and corresponding frequencies.
- Commission Decision of 10 October 2011 on modalities for coordinated application of the rules on enforcement with regard to mobile satellite services (MSS) pursuant to Article 9(3) of Decision No 626/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document C(2011) 7001) (Text with EEA relevance) (2011/667/EU) Decision · Grade B
In accordance with Article 7(1) of Decision No 626/2008/EC Member States should ensure that the selected applicants have the right to use the specific radio frequency identified in Decision 2009/449/EC and the right to operate a mobile satellite system according to the time-frame and in the service area to which the selected applicants have committed themselves.
- Commission Decision of 10 October 2011 on modalities for coordinated application of the rules on enforcement with regard to mobile satellite services (MSS) pursuant to Article 9(3) of Decision No 626/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document C(2011) 7001) (Text with EEA relevance) (2011/667/EU) Decision · Grade B
authorised operator shall mean an operator selected pursuant to Decision 2009/449/EC which has been granted the right under general authorisation or individual rights of use to use the specific radio frequencies identified in Decision 2009/449/EC and/or the right to operate a mobile satellite system,
- Commission Decision of 10 October 2011 on modalities for coordinated application of the rules on enforcement with regard to mobile satellite services (MSS) pursuant to Article 9(3) of Decision No 626/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document C(2011) 7001) (Text with EEA relevance) (2011/667/EU) Decision · Grade B
authorising Member State shall mean a Member State which has granted authorised operators rights under general authorisation or individual rights of use to use the specific radio frequencies identified in Decision 2009/449/EC and/or the right to operate a mobile satellite system.
- Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 March 2020 –ViaSat v Commission (Case T‑734/17) Judgment · Grade B
Re: Application under Article 263 TFEU, first, for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision rejecting the applicant’s confirmatory application of 10 July 2017 for access to any information provided by Inmarsat plc, Inmarsat Ventures or its subsidiaries on the occasion of their participation in the European Union call for tenders which led to the adoption of Commission Decision 2009/449/EC of 13 May 2009 on the selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) (OJ 2009 L 149, p. 65) and to any exchange of information in that regard between Inmarsat a
- Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 March 2020 –ViaSat v Commission (Case T‑734/17) Judgment · Grade B
Declares that there is no need to rule on the lawfulness of the European Commission’s implied decision rejecting the applicant’s confirmatory application of 10 July 2017 for access to all the information provided by Inmarsat plc, Inmarsat Ventures Ltd or its subsidiaries on the occasion of their participation in the European Union call for tenders which led to the adoption of Commission Decision 2009/449/EC of 13 May 2009 on the selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) and to any exchange of information in that regard between Inmarsat and the Com
- Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 10 July 2009 — TerreStar Europe v Commission (Case T-196/09 R) Notice · Grade B
Application for interim measuresDecision on the selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite servicesApplication for suspension of operation of the measure and interim reliefNo urgency2009/C 233/33Language of the case: English Applicant: TerreStar Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Olofsson, lawyer and J. Killick, Barrister) Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Braun, A. Nijenhuis, K. Platteau and D. Van Liedekerke, lawyers) In essence, application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision 2009/449/EC o
- Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) 10 March 2021 Judgment · Grade B
At the end of the selection procedure at issue, the Commission adopted Decision 2009/449/EC of 13 May 2009 on the selection of operators of pan-European systems providing MSS (OJ 2009 L 149, p. 65; the Selection Decision) by which it selected two applicants: Inmarsat Ventures Ltd (Inmarsat) and Solaris Mobile Ltd (now EchoStar Mobile Ltd) (EchoStar), interveners in the present proceedings in support of the form of order sought by the Commission.
- Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 12 November 2020 Case C‑515/19 Eutelsat SA v Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et des postes, Inmarsat Ventures SE, formerly Inmarsat Ventures Ltd, interveners: Viasat Inc., Viasat UK Ltd (Request for a preliminary rulingfrom the Conseil d’État (Council of State, France)) Opinion · Grade B
That decision of the ARCEP follows Decision 2009/449/EC, by which the Commission selected Inmarsat and Solaris Mobile Limited as operators of mobile satellite systems authorised to use the 2 GHz frequency band, in accordance with Decision 2007/98/EC and Decision No 626/2008/EC.
- Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 12 November 2020 Case C‑515/19 Eutelsat SA v Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et des postes, Inmarsat Ventures SE, formerly Inmarsat Ventures Ltd, interveners: Viasat Inc., Viasat UK Ltd (Request for a preliminary rulingfrom the Conseil d’État (Council of State, France)) Opinion · Grade B
Decision 2009/449
- Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 12 November 2020 Case C‑515/19 Eutelsat SA v Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et des postes, Inmarsat Ventures SE, formerly Inmarsat Ventures Ltd, interveners: Viasat Inc., Viasat UK Ltd (Request for a preliminary rulingfrom the Conseil d’État (Council of State, France)) Opinion · Grade B
In implementation of Decision No 626/2008, the Commission, by Decision 2009/449, selected Inmarsat and Solaris Mobile Limited as operators of mobile satellite systems authorised to use the 2 GHz frequency band, in accordance with Decision 2007/98.
- Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 12 November 2020 Case C‑515/19 Eutelsat SA v Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et des postes, Inmarsat Ventures SE, formerly Inmarsat Ventures Ltd, interveners: Viasat Inc., Viasat UK Ltd (Request for a preliminary rulingfrom the Conseil d’État (Council of State, France)) Opinion · Grade B
By Decision No 2014-1257 of 21 October 2014, the ARCEP authorised Inmarsat to use the frequencies designated by Decision 2009/449 in metropolitan France.
- Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 12 November 2020 Case C‑515/19 Eutelsat SA v Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et des postes, Inmarsat Ventures SE, formerly Inmarsat Ventures Ltd, interveners: Viasat Inc., Viasat UK Ltd (Request for a preliminary rulingfrom the Conseil d’État (Council of State, France)) Opinion · Grade B
It is apparent from the information provided by that court that Inmarsat intends to use the authorisation granted by Decision 2009/449 to develop the EAN system.
- Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 12 November 2020 Case C‑515/19 Eutelsat SA v Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et des postes, Inmarsat Ventures SE, formerly Inmarsat Ventures Ltd, interveners: Viasat Inc., Viasat UK Ltd (Request for a preliminary rulingfrom the Conseil d’État (Council of State, France)) Opinion · Grade B
The EAN system provides a mobile service to aircraft using satellite transmissions, which are received by a terminal located above the aircraft fuselage, and transmissions from complementary ground components deployed on the territory of the European Union, which are received by a terminal located below the aircraft fuselage. All those transmissions use the frequency band awarded to Inmarsat by Decision 2009/449. That system uses a satellite put into service on 29 August 2017.
- Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 18 November 2021 Case C‑235/20 P ViaSat, Inc. v European Commission Opinion · Grade B
The applicant, ViaSat, is a technology company providing communications solutions for individuals, businesses, and governments. On 2 May 2017, the applicant submitted an application for access to [any] information submitted by Inmarsat PLC, Inmarsat Ventures Limited, and/or any of its affiliates, at the occasion of its participation in the EU tender completed on 13 May 2009 by Commission Decision 2009/449/EC on the selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) and any exchange of information between Inmarsat and the European Commission during the tend
- Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) 15 April 2021 Judgment · Grade B
Under Article 2 of Commission Decision 2009/449/EC of 13 May 2009 on the selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) (OJ 2009 L 149, p. 65) (the selection decision): Inmarsat Ventures Limited and Solaris Mobile Limited are eligible applicants as a result of the first selection phase of the comparative selection procedure provided in Title II of [the MSS decision]. As the combined demand for radio spectrum requested by the eligible applicants retained as a result of the first selection phase of the comparative selection procedure provided in Title II
- Order of the General Court of 4 July 2012 — ICO Satellite v Commission (Case T-350/09) Notice · Grade B
Actions for annulmentPeriod allowed for commencing proceedingsPoint from which time starts to runAbsence of excusable errorManifest inadmissibility2012/C 273/12Language of the case: English Applicant: ICO Satellite Ltd (Slough, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Tupper, Solicitor, D. Anderson QC, and D. Scannell, Barrister) Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and A. Nijenhuis, acting as Agents, assisted by D. Van Liedekerke and K. Platteau, lawyers) Interveners in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Florindo Gijón and G. Kimberley,
- Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) 5 March 2020 Judgment · Grade B
Under Article 2 of Commission Decision 2009/449/EC of 13 May 2009 on the selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) (OJ 2009 L 149, p. 65) (the selection decision): Inmarsat … and Solaris Mobile Limited are eligible applicants as a result of the first selection phase of the comparative selection procedure provided in Title II of [the MSS decision]. As the combined demand for radio spectrum requested by the eligible applicants retained as a result of the first selection phase of the comparative selection procedure provided in Title II of [the MSS de
- Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2020 — ViaSat v Commission (Case T-734/17) Notice · Grade B
Access to documentsRegulation (EC) No 1049/2001Mobile satellite system operatorDocuments provided to the Commission by a candidate selected in a call for tendersImplied and express refusal of accessException relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third partyOverriding public interestRefusal of partial access2020/C 175/12Language of the case: English Applicant: ViaSat, Inc. (Carlsbad, California, United States) (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado, L. Marco Perpiñà, P. de Bandt and M. Gherghinaru, lawyers) Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and C. Ehrbar
- Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2020 — ViaSat v Commission (Case T-734/17) Notice · Grade B
Declares that there is no need to rule on the lawfulness of the European Commission’s implied decision rejecting the applicant’s confirmatory application of 10 July 2017 for access to all the information provided by Inmarsat plc, Inmarsat Ventures Ltd or its subsidiaries on the occasion of their participation in the European Union call for tenders which led to the adoption of Commission Decision 2009/449/EC of 13 May 2009 on the selection of operators of pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) and to any exchange of information in that regard between Inmarsat and the Com