Council Decision of 20 December 2012 on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Poland (2013/3/EU)
Grade B
mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.
Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/decision/2013/3@2012-12-20/en
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime, in particular Article 2(3) and Article 25 thereof,
Having regard to Council Decision 2008/616/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA, in particular Article 20 and Chapter 4 of the Annex thereto,
Whereas:
(1) According to the Protocol on Transitional Provisions annexed to the Treaty on European Union, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, the legal effects of the acts of the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union adopted prior to the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon are preserved until those acts are repealed, annulled or amended in implementation of the Treaties.
(2) Accordingly, Article 25 of Decision 2008/615/JHA is applicable and the Council must unanimously decide whether the Member States have implemented the provisions of Chapter 6 of that Decision.
(3) Article 20 of Decision 2008/616/JHA provides that decisions referred to in Article 25(2) of Decision 2008/615/JHA are to be taken on the basis of an evaluation report based on a questionnaire. With respect to automated data exchange in accordance with Chapter 2 of Decision 2008/615/JHA, the evaluation report is to be based on an evaluation visit and a pilot run.
(4) Poland has informed the General Secretariat of the Council of the national DNA analysis files to which Articles 2 to 6 of Decision 2008/615/JHA apply and the conditions for automated searching as referred to in Article 3(1) of that Decision in accordance with Article 36(2) of that Decision.
(5) According to Chapter 4, point 1.1, of the Annex to Decision 2008/616/JHA, the questionnaire drawn up by the relevant Council Working Group concerns each of the automated data exchanges and has to be answered by a Member State as soon as it believes it fulfils the prerequisites for sharing data in the relevant data category.
(6) Poland has completed the questionnaire on data protection and the questionnaire on DNA data exchange.
(7) A successful pilot run has been carried out by Poland with Slovakia.
(8) An evaluation visit has taken place in Poland and a report on the evaluation visit has been produced by the Slovakian evaluation team and forwarded to the relevant Council Working Group.
(9) An overall evaluation report, summarising the results of the questionnaire, the evaluation visit and the pilot run concerning DNA data exchange has been presented to the Council,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
For the purposes of automated searching and comparison of DNA data, Poland has fully implemented the general provisions on data protection of Chapter 6 of Decision 2008/615/JHA and is entitled to receive and supply personal data pursuant to Articles 3 and 4 of that Decision as from the day of the entry into force of this Decision.
Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.
Done at Brussels, 20 December 2012. For the Council The President E. Flourentzou
Versions
Cited by
- Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/945 of 18 May 2017 on the automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Slovakia, Portugal, Latvia, Lithuania, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Cyprus, Poland, Sweden, Malta and Belgium and replacing Decisions 2010/689/EU, 2011/472/EU, 2011/715/EU, 2011/887/EU, 2012/58/EU, 2012/299/EU, 2012/445/EU, 2012/673/EU, 2013/3/EU, 2013/148/EU, 2013/152/EU and 2014/410/EU Decision · Grade B
By adopting Council Decision 2013/3/EU, the Council concluded that Poland has fully implemented the general provisions on data protection under Chapter 6 of Decision 2008/615/JHA and is entitled to receive and supply personal data pursuant to Articles 3 and 4 of that Decision as from 20 December 2012, and it also concluded that the evaluation report was approved in accordance with Article 25(2) of Decision 2008/615/JHA.
- Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) 1 March 2018 Judgment · Grade B
Article 1 of the Charter of Veterinary Practitioners, adopted by Decision No 3/2013 of the CMVRO (Monitorul Oficial al României, Part I, No 676 of 16 September 2014) (the Charter of Veterinary Practitioners), provides as follows: For the purposes of this Charter, the following definitions shall apply: … …
- Opinion of Advocate General Wahl delivered on 21 September 2017 Case C‑297/16 Colegiul Medicilor Veterinari din România v Autoritatea Naţională Sanitară Veterinară şi pentru Siguranţa Alimentelor Intervening party: Asociaţia Naţională a Distribuitorilor de Produse de Uz Veterinar din România (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti (Court of Appeal, Bucharest, Romania)) Opinion · Grade B
Article 1(m) of the CVP, adopted by the College by Decision No 3/2013, contains the following definition: [Register] — official and public document managed by the Bureau of the [College] which includes the following: all veterinary care establishments whether or not having legal personality authorised to practise in Romania; veterinary pharmacies and veterinary pharmaceutical outlets, if their capital is exclusively held by veterinary practitioners or if it is otherwise amassed in the wake of subsequent legislative amendments …