Gelex

Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2431 of 21 December 2015 amending Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

In forceVersion 2015-12-21from 2015-12-22
Grade B

mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.

Ask Gelex about this law

Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/decision/2015/2431@2015-12-21/en

Contents
  1. Preamble
    1. Article 1
    2. Article 2

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

(1) On 31 July 2014 the Council adopted Decision 2014/512/CFSP.

(2) On 19 March 2015 the European Council agreed that the necessary measures would be taken to clearly link the duration of the restrictive measures set out in Decision 2014/512/CFSP to the complete implementation of the Minsk agreements.

(3) The Minsk agreements will not be completely implemented by 31 December 2015. Decision 2014/512/CFSP should therefore be renewed for a further six months in order to enable the Council to further assess the implementation of those agreements.

(4) Decision 2014/512/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP is replaced by the following: This Decision shall apply until 31 July 2016..

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 2015. For the Council The President J. Asselborn

Versions

  1. 2015-12-21

Cited by

  • Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Almaz-Antey v Council (Case T-515/15) Notice · Grade B
    (Common foreign and security policyRestrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in UkraineRetention of the applicant’s name on the list of entities to which the restrictive measures applyProportionalityError of assessmentObligation to state reasonsFundamental rights)2018/C 392/24Language of the case: English Applicant: Joint-Stock Company Almaz-Antey Air and Space Defence Corp., formerly OAO Concern PVO Almaz-Antey (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: A. Haak, C. Stumpf and M. Brüggemann, lawyers) Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.
  • Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Sberbank of Russia v Council (Case T-732/14) Notice · Grade B
    (Common foreign and security policyRestrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in UkraineApplicant’s name included and retained in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures applyError of assessmentObligation to state reasonsRights of the defenceRight to effective judicial protectionRight to propertyRight to carry on an economic activity)2018/C 392/17Language of the case: English Applicant: Sberbank of Russia OAO (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: D. Rose QC, M. Lester QC, J.-A. Fearns and P. Crowther, Solicitors) Defendant: Council of the Eu
  • Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 –Rosneft and Others v Council (Case T-715/14) Notice · Grade B
    (Common foreign and security policyRestrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in UkraineObligation to state reasonsManifest error of assessmentRights of the defence and right to effective judicial protectionPartnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and RussiaRight to propertyEqual treatmentProportionalityMisuse of powersLegal certainty)2018/C 392/16Language of the case: English Applicants: PAO Rosneft Oil Company, formerly NK Rosneft OAO (Moscow, Russia), RN-Shelf-Arctic OOO (Moscow), AO RN-Shelf-Far East, formerly RN-Shelf-Dalni
  • Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — DenizBank v Council (Case T-798/14) Notice · Grade B
    (Common foreign and security policyRestrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in UkraineInclusion of the name of the entity owning the applicant in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures applyObligation to state reasonsRights of the defenceRight to effective judicial protectionEU-Turkey Association AgreementFundamental rightsProportionality)2018/C 392/22Language of the case: English Applicant: DenizBank A.Ş. (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: O. Jones, D. Heaton, Barristers, R. Mattick, S. Utku, Solicitors, and M. Lester QC) Defendant:
  • Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 13 September 2018 Judgment · Grade B
    In Case T‑732/14, Sberbank of Russia OAO, established in Moscow (Russia), represented by D. Rose QC, M. Lester, QC, J.-A. Fearns and P. Crowther, Solicitors, applicant,v Council of the European Union, represented by S. Boelaert and J.‑P. Hix, acting as Agents, defendant, supported by European Commission, represented by D. Gauci, L. Havas and T. Scharf, acting as Agents, intervener, APPLICATION under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2
  • Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 13 September 2018 Judgment · Grade B
    The validity of Decision 2014/512 was extended until 31 January 2016, by Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/971 of 22 June 2015 amending Decision 2014/512 (OJ 2015 L 157, p. 50), and then until 31 July 2016 by Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2431 of 21 December 2015 amending Decision 2014/512 (OJ 2015 L 334, p. 22), until 31 January 2017 by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/1071 of 1 July 2016 amending Decision 2014/512 (OJ 2016 L 178, p. 21), until 31 July 2017 by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2315 of 19 December 2016 amending Decision 2014/512 (OJ 2016 L 345, p. 65), and lastly until 31 January 2018 by Cou
  • Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 13 September 2018 Judgment · Grade B
    By statement lodged at the Court Registry on 5 January 2016, the applicant modified its application so as also to include the annulment of Decision 2015/2431, in that that decision extended the applicability of the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/512, including the listing of the applicant’s name among the entities affected by those measures, until 31 July 2016.
  • Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 13 September 2018 Judgment · Grade B
    The applicant claims, in essence, that the Court should: annul (i) Decision 2014/512, as extended or amended by Decision 2014/659, Decision 2015/971, Decision 2015/2431, Decision 2016/1071, Decision 2016/2315 and Decision 2017/1148 (the contested decision) and (ii) the contested regulation (taken together, the contested acts), insofar as those acts concern the applicant; order the Council to pay the costs.
  • Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 13 September 2018 Judgment · Grade B
    In Case T‑798/14, DenizBank A.Ş., established in Istanbul (Turkey), represented by O. Jones, D. Heaton, Barristers, R. Mattick, S. Utku, Solicitors, and M. Lester QC, applicant,v Council of the European Union, represented initially by S. Boelaert and A. de Elera-San Miguel Hurtado, and subsequently by S. Boelaert and P. Mahnič Bruni, acting as Agents, defendant, supported by European Commission, represented by D. Gauci, L. Havas and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agents, intervener, APPLICATION under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 co
  • Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 13 September 2018 Judgment · Grade B
    On 21 December 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/2431 amending Decision 2014/512 (OJ 2015 L 334, p. 22). On 1 July 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/1071 amending Decision 2014/512 (OJ 2016 L 178, p. 21). Lastly, on 19 December 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/2315 amending Decision 2014/512 (OJ 2016 L 345, p. 65).
  • Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 13 September 2018 Judgment · Grade B
    By statement lodged at the Court Registry on 24 December 2015, the applicant modified its application so as also to include the annulment of Decision 2015/2431, in that that decision extended the applicability of the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/512.
  • Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 13 September 2018 Judgment · Grade B
    The applicant claims, in essence, that the Court should: annul (i) Decision 2014/512, as extended or amended by Decision 2014/659, Decision 2014/872, Decision 2015/2431, Decision 2016/1071 and Decision 2016/2315 (the contested decision) and (ii) Regulation No 833/2014, as amended by Regulation No 960/2014 and Regulation No 1290/2014 (the contested regulation), insofar as the contested decision and the contested regulation (taken together, the contested acts) concern the applicant and in so far as they cannot be interpreted in such a way as to exclude the applicant from their scope; order the C