Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/decision/2015/348@2015-03-02/en

Contents

1. Preamble
2. 1. Article 1
   2. Article 2
3. ANNEX
4. ANNEX Performance targets in the key performance areas of safety, environment, capacity and cost-efficiency included in the national or functional airspace block plans submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 found to be consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period
5. KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF SAFETY Effectiveness of Safety Management (EOSM) and the application of the severity classification based on the Risk Analysis Tool (RAT) methodology Abbreviations:
6. KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF ENVIRONMENT Horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory
7. KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF CAPACITY En route Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay in min/flight
8. KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 laying down the framework for the creation of the single European sky (the framework Regulation), and in particular Article 11(3)(c) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, the Member States are to adopt national or functional airspace block (FAB) plans, including binding national targets or targets at the level of FABs, ensuring consistency with the Union-wide performance targets. That Regulation also provides that the Commission is to assess the consistency of those targets on the basis of the assessment criteria referred to in point (d) of its Article 11(6) and that the Commission may decide to issue recommendations in case it identifies that those criteria have not been met. Detailed rules in this regard have been set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013.

(2) Union-wide performance targets in the key performance areas of safety, environment, capacity and cost-efficiency for the second reference period (2015-2019) were adopted by Commission Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU.

(3) The Member States submitted to the Commission the performance plans, all at FAB level, by 1 July 2014. In a number of cases the initial submission was in a draft form only. Furthermore, a number of plans were subsequently modified by addenda or corrigenda, the latest one dated 9 January 2015. For its assessment, the Commission has based itself on the most recent information submitted.

(4) The Performance Review Body, which is charged with assisting the Commission in the implementation of the performance scheme pursuant to Article 3 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013, submitted an initial assessment report to the Commission on 7 October 2014 and an updated version of that report on 15 December 2014. The Commission further received from the Performance Review Body reports based on information from national supervisory authorities on the monitoring of the performance plans and targets submitted in accordance with Article 18(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013.

(5) Concerning the key performance area of safety, the consistency of the targets submitted by the Member States regarding the effectiveness of safety management and the application of severity classification on the basis of the Risk Analysis Tool (RAT) methodology has been assessed, in accordance with the principles laid down in point 2 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013. That assessment has demonstrated that the targets submitted by all Member States, as regards FABCE, UK-IR FAB, FABEC, Baltic FAB, Blue Med FAB, Danube FAB, DK-SE FAB, NEFAB and SW FAB, are consistent with the relevant Union-wide performance target.

(6) Concerning the key performance area of environment, the consistency of the targets submitted by the Member States has been assessed, in accordance with the principles laid down in point 3 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013, by using the respective FAB reference values for horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory that, when applied, ensure at Union level that the Union-wide performance target is met, calculated by the Network Manager and set out in the Network Operations Plan (2014-2018/2019) in its most recent version of June 2014 (Network Operations Plan). That assessment has demonstrated that the targets submitted by all Member States, as regards FABCE, UK-IR FAB, FABEC, Baltic FAB, Blue Med FAB, Danube FAB, DK-SE FAB, NEFAB and SW FAB, are consistent with the relevant Union-wide performance target.

(7) Concerning the key performance area of capacity, the consistency of the targets submitted by the Member States for en route Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay has been assessed, in accordance with the principles laid down in point 4 of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013, by using the respective FAB reference values for capacity that, when applied, ensure at Union level that the Union-wide performance target is met, calculated by the Network Manager and set out in the Network Operations Plan. That assessment has demonstrated that the targets submitted by the United Kingdom and Ireland as regards UK-IR FAB, by Poland and Lithuania as regards Baltic FAB, by Denmark and Sweden as regards DK-SE FAB and by Estonia, Finland and Latvia as regards NEFAB are consistent with the relevant Union-wide performance target.

(8) Concerning the key performance area of cost-efficiency, the targets expressed in en route determined unit costs submitted by the Member States have been assessed, in accordance with the principles laid down in point 5, in conjunction with point 1, of Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013, by taking account of the trend of en route determined unit costs over the second reference period and the combined period of the first and the second reference period (2012-2019), the number of service units (traffic forecast) and the level of en route determined unit costs in comparison to Member States having a similar operational and economic environment. That assessment has demonstrated that the targets submitted by the United Kingdom and Ireland as regards UK-IR FAB, by Poland and Lithuania as regards Baltic FAB, by Cyprus, Greece and Malta as regards Blue Med FAB, by Bulgaria and Romania as regards Danube FAB, by Croatia, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Hungary as regards FABCE, by Portugal and Spain for Spain Continental and Spain Canarias charging zones as regards FAB SW, by Denmark and Sweden as regards DK-SE FAB and by Estonia, Finland and Latvia as regards NEFAB are consistent with the relevant Union-wide performance target.

(9) Therefore, the Commission considers that the targets included in the performance plans drawn up by the United Kingdom and Ireland as regards the UK-IR FAB, by Denmark and Sweden as regards the DK-SE FAB, by Poland and Lithuania, as regards the Baltic FAB and by Estonia, Finland and Latvia as regards NEFAB are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in all four key performance areas. The Commission further considers that the targets submitted by Belgium, Luxembourg, France, Germany and the Netherlands as regards FABEC, by Austria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia as regards FABCE, by Cyprus, Greece, Italy and Malta as regards Blue Med FAB, Bulgaria and Romania as regards Danube FAB and by Portugal and Spain as regards SW FAB are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance areas of safety and environment. The Commission also considers that the targets submitted by Cyprus, Greece and Malta as regards Blue Med FAB, by Bulgaria and Romania as regards the Danube FAB, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Hungary as regards the FAB CE and Portugal and Spain as regards the SW FAB are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets in the key performance areas of cost-efficiency. Therefore, in relation to all those targets there is no need to issue recommendations that the national supervisory authorities concerned propose revised targets. With respect to the targets submitted by those Member States that are not consistent with the relevant Union-wide performance targets, the Commission has issued such recommendations, as set out in the Commission Implementing Decision concerning inconsistency of targets C(2015) 1263.

(10) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Single Sky Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The targets included in the performance plans submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004, listed in the Annex, are consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period set out in Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 March 2015. For the Commission Violeta Bulc Member of the Commission

ANNEX

ANNEX Performance targets in the key performance areas of safety, environment, capacity and cost-efficiency included in the national or functional airspace block plans submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 found to be consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF SAFETY Effectiveness of Safety Management (EOSM) and the application of the severity classification based on the Risk Analysis Tool (RAT) methodology Abbreviations:

MEMBER STATE FAB EOSM ATM Ground Level % (RAT) ATM overall Level % (RAT) STATE Level ANSP Level 2017 2019 2017 2019 SC Other MO SMI RI's ATM-S SMI RI's ATM-S SMI RI's ATM-S SMI RI's ATM-S Austria FABCE C D D 94,17 93,33 80 100 100 100 80 80 80 80 80 100 Croatia Czech Republic Hungary Slovakia Slovenia Ireland UK-IR C C D 80 80 80 100 100 100 80 80 80 80 80 100 United Kingdom Belgium/Luxembourg FABEC C C D ≥ 80 ≥ 80 ≥ 80 100 100 100 ≥ 80 ≥ 80 ≥ 80 ≥ 80 ≥ 80 100 France Germany The Netherlands [Switzerland] Poland Baltic C C D ≥ 80 ≥ 80 ≥ 80 100 100 100 ≥ 80 ≥ 80 ≥ 80 90 90 100 Lithuania Cyprus Blue Med C C D 80 80 80 100 100 100 80 80 80 95 95 100 Greece Italy Malta Bulgaria Danube C C D 90 90 80 100 100 100 80 85 80 90 90 100 Romania Denmark DK-SE C C D 80 80 80 100 100 100 80 80 80 80 80 100 Sweden Estonia NEFAB C C D 95 95 85 100 100 100 90 90 85 100 100 100 Finland Latvia [Norway] Portugal SW C D D 90 90 90 100 100 100 80 80 90 80 80 100 Spain SC Management objective safety culture as referred to in point 1.1(a) of section 2 of Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 other MO Management objectives as listed in point 1.1(a) of section 2 of Annex I to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 other than safety culture RIs Runway incursions SMI Separation minima infringements ATM-S ATM-specific occurrences

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF ENVIRONMENT Horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory

MEMBER STATE FAB FAB TARGET ENVIRONMENT (%) 2019 Austria FABCE 1,81 Croatia Czech Republic Hungary Slovakia Slovenia Ireland UK-IR 2,99 United Kingdom Belgium/Luxembourg FABEC 2,96 France Germany The Netherlands [Switzerland] Poland Baltic 1,36 Lithuania Cyprus Blue Med 2,45 Greece Italy Malta Bulgaria Danube 1,37 Romania Denmark DK-SE 1,19 Sweden Estonia NEFAB 1,22 Finland Latvia [Norway] Portugal SW 3,28 Spain

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF CAPACITY En route Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay in min/flight

MEMBER STATE FAB FAB TARGET EN-ROUTE CAPACITY 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Ireland UK-IR 0,25 0,26 0,26 0,26 0,26 United Kingdom Poland Baltic 0,21 0,21 0,21 0,22 0,22 Lithuania Denmark DK-SE 0,10 0,10 0,10 0,09 0,09 Sweden Estonia NEFAB 0,12 0,12 0,13 0,13 0,13 Finland Latvia [Norway]

KEY PERFORMANCE AREA OF COST-EFFICIENCY

Legend: Key Item Units (A) Total En-route Determined Costs (in nominal terms and in national currency) (B) Inflation rate (%) (C) Inflation index (100 = 2009) (D) Total En-route Determined Costs (in real 2009 prices and in national currency) (E) Total En-route Services Units (TSUs) (F) En-route Determined Unit Cost (DUC) (in real 2009 prices and in national currency)

BALTIC FAB Charging Zone: Lithuania — Currency: EUR Charging Zone: Poland — Currency: PLN

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 23316993 23342321 24186978 25093574 25748766 (B) 1,7 % 2,2 % 2,5 % 2,2 % 2,2 % (C) 112,9 115,4 118,4 121,0 123,7 (D) 20652919 20223855 20434886 20737566 20814037 (E) 490928 508601 524877 541672 559548 (F) 42,07 39,76 38,93 38,28 37,20 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 658592342 687375337 713570963 730747925 749146920 (B) 2,4 % 2,5 % 2,5 % 2,5 % 2,5 % (C) 115,9 118,7 121,7 124,8 127,9 (D) 568474758 578848069 586251473 585720606 585822496 (E) 4362840 4544000 4699000 4861000 5039000 (F) 130,30 127,39 124,76 120,49 116,26

BLUE MED FAB Charging Zone: Cyprus — Currency: EUR Charging Zone: Greece — Currency: EUR Charging Zone: Malta — Currency: EUR

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 52708045 53598493 55916691 57610277 59360816 (B) 1,6 % 1,7 % 1,7 % 1,8 % 2,0 % (C) 112,9 114,8 116,8 118,9 121,3 (D) 46681639 46676772 47881610 48459560 48952987 (E) 1395081 1425773 1457140 1489197 1521959 (F) 33,46 32,74 32,86 32,54 32,16 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 147841464 151226557 155317991 156939780 164629376 (B) 0,3 % 1,1 % 1,2 % 1,3 % 1,6 % (C) 107,9 109,1 110,4 111,8 113,6 (D) 136958572 138630543 140635901 140350008 144936752 (E) 4231888 4318281 4404929 4492622 4599834 (F) 32,36 32,10 31,93 31,24 31,51 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 17736060 19082057 20694940 21720523 22752314 (B) 1,7 % 1,8 % 1,7 % 1,7 % 1,7 % (C) 111,9 114,0 115,9 117,9 119,9 (D) 15844908 16745957 17857802 18429483 18982242 (E) 609000 621000 634000 653000 672000 (F) 26,02 26,97 28,17 28,22 28,25

DANUBE FAB Charging Zone: Bulgaria — Currency: BGN Charging Zone: Romania — Currency: RON

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 166771377 172805739 178045986 181582049 184412180 (B) 0,9 % 1,8 % 2,2 % 2,2 % 2,2 % (C) 110,1 112,1 114,5 117,0 119,6 (D) 151495007 154219178 155475340 155149844 154176130 (E) 2627000 2667000 2903000 2984837 3090000 (F) 57,67 57,82 53,56 51,98 49,90 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 690507397 704650329 718659958 735119853 753216461 (B) 3,1 % 3,0 % 2,8 % 2,8 % 2,7 % (C) 126,9 130,7 134,4 138,2 141,9 (D) 543963841 538937162 534681066 532030334 530795951 (E) 4012887 4117019 4219063 4317155 4441542 (F) 135,55 130,90 126,73 123,24 119,51

DENMARK-SWEDEN FAB Charging Zone: Denmark — Currency: DKK Charging Zone: Sweden — Currency: SEK

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 726872134 724495393 735983926 749032040 750157741 (B) 1,8 % 2,2 % 2,2 % 2,2 % 2,2 % (C) 111,6 114,1 116,6 119,1 121,8 (D) 651263654 635160606 631342985 628704443 616095213 (E) 1553000 1571000 1589000 1608000 1628000 (F) 419,36 404,30 397,32 390,99 378,44 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 1951544485 1974263091 1970314688 1964628986 1958887595 (B) 1,6 % 2,4 % 2,1 % 2,0 % 2,0 % (C) 106,1 108,6 110,9 113,1 115,4 (D) 1840204091 1817994673 1777040937 1737169570 1698130296 (E) 3257000 3303000 3341000 3383000 3425000 (F) 565,00 550,41 531,89 513,50 495,80

FABCE Charging Zone: Croatia — Currency: HRK Charging Zone: Czech Republic — Currency: CZK Charging Zone: Hungary — Currency: HUF Charging Zone: Slovenia — Currency: EUR

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 670066531 687516987 691440691 687394177 674346800 (B) 0,2 % 1,0 % 1,5 % 2,5 % 2,5 % (C) 109,2 110,4 112,0 114,8 117,7 (D) 613414184 622991131 617287272 598707050 573017597 (E) 1763000 1783000 1808000 1863185 1926787 (F) 347,94 349,41 341,42 321,34 297,40 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 3022287900 3087882700 3126037100 3149817800 3102014900 (B) 1,9 % 2,0 % 2,0 % 2,0 % 2,0 % (C) 111,5 113,7 116,0 118,3 120,7 (D) 2710775667 2715303433 2694955079 2662212166 2570401338 (E) 2548000 2637000 2717000 2795000 2881000 (F) 1063,88 1029,69 991,89 952,49 892,19 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 28133097383 29114984951 29632945277 30406204408 31345254629 (B) 1,8 % 3,0 % 3,0 % 3,0 % 3,0 % (C) 119,3 122,8 126,5 130,3 134,2 (D) 23587547923 23699795100 23418852735 23330056076 23350067982 (E) 2457201 2364165 2413812 2453639 2512526 (F) 9599,36 10024,60 9702,02 9508,35 9293,46 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 32094283 33168798 33870218 34392801 35029005 (B) 1,6 % 2,1 % 1,9 % 2,0 % 2,0 % (C) 111,9 114,3 116,5 118,8 121,2 (D) 28675840 29018678 29079819 28949500 28906876 (E) 481500 499637 514217 529770 546470 (F) 59,56 58,08 56,55 54,65 52,90

NEFAB Charging Zone: Estonia — Currency: EUR Charging Zone: Finland — Currency: EUR Charging Zone: Latvia — Currency: EUR

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 23098175 24757151 25985553 27073003 28182980 (B) 3,0 % 3,1 % 3,0 % 3,0 % 3,0 % (C) 123,3 127,1 130,9 134,8 138,9 (D) 18739585 19481586 19852645 20081013 20295459 (E) 774641 801575 827117 855350 885643 (F) 24,19 24,30 24,00 23,48 22,92 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 45050000 45596000 46064000 46321000 46468000 (B) 1,5 % 1,7 % 1,9 % 2,0 % 2,0 % (C) 114,4 116,4 118,6 121,0 123,4 (D) 39368663 39179750 38843860 38294684 37662953 (E) 792600 812000 827000 843000 861000 (F) 49,67 48,25 46,97 45,43 43,74 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 22680662 23118000 23902000 24692818 25534000 (B) 2,5 % 2,3 % 2,3 % 2,3 % 2,3 % (C) 109,7 112,2 114,8 117,4 120,1 (D) 20683885 20603685 20823477 21028777 21256247 (E) 802000 824000 844000 867000 890000 (F) 25,79 25,00 24,67 24,25 23,88

SW FAB Charging Zone: Portugal — Currency: EUR

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 111331252 117112878 121117127 124427807 127871286 (B) 1,2 % 1,5 % 1,5 % 1,5 % 1,5 % (C) 110,5 112,2 113,8 115,5 117,3 (D) 100758704 104424905 106399345 107692336 109037112 (E) 3095250 3104536 3122232 3147209 3171128 (F) 32,55 33,64 34,08 34,22 34,38

SPAIN Charging Zone: Spain Continental — Currency: EUR Charging Zone: Spain Canarias — Currency: EUR

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 620443569 622072583 622240962 625580952 627777294 (B) 0,8 % 0,9 % 1,0 % 1,0 % 1,1 % (C) 110,6 111,6 112,7 113,9 115,1 (D) 561172369 557638172 552025959 549379889 545563910 (E) 8880000 8936000 9018000 9128000 9238000 (F) 63,20 62,40 61,21 60,19 59,06 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 98528223 98750683 99003882 98495359 98326935 (B) 0,8 % 0,9 % 1,0 % 1,0 % 1,1 % (C) 110,6 111,6 112,7 113,9 115,1 (D) 89115786 88522066 87832072 86497790 85450091 (E) 1531000 1528000 1531000 1537000 1543000 (F) 58,21 57,93 57,37 56,28 55,38

UK-IR FAB Charging Zone: Ireland — Currency: EUR Charging Zone: United Kingdom — Currency: GBP

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 118046200 121386700 125595100 129364400 130778800 (B) 1,1 % 1,2 % 1,4 % 1,7 % 1,7 % (C) 103,7 105,0 106,4 108,2 110,1 (D) 113811728 115644664 118001964 119511684 118798780 (E) 4000000 4049624 4113288 4184878 4262135 (F) 28,45 28,56 28,69 28,56 27,87 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 (A) 686348218 687119724 690004230 682569359 673089111 (B) 1,9 % 1,9 % 2,0 % 2,0 % 2,0 % (C) 118,2 120,5 122,9 125,3 127,8 (D) 580582809 570397867 561561156 544617914 526523219 (E) 10244000 10435000 10583000 10758000 10940000 (F) 56,68 54,66 53,06 50,62 48,13

Versions

1. 2015-03-02

Cited by

• Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1985 of 31 October 2017 allowing targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency for the years 2017, 2018 and 2019 for air navigation services of Malta, Bulgaria, and Poland to be revised in accordance with Article 17(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 (notified under document C(2017) 7121) (Only the Bulgarian, English, Maltese and Polish texts are authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) Decision · Grade B

  The Commission adopted Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 which established, inter alia, that the local targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency of Malta, Bulgaria and Poland included in the performance plans of BLUEMED FAB, DANUBE FAB and BALTIC FAB, respectively, were consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period (2015-2019).

• Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/422 of 18 March 2016 on the compliance of unit rates for charging zones for 2015 under Article 17 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 391/2013 (notified under document C(2016) 1595) (Only the German, Italian and Slovak texts are authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) Decision · Grade B

  Pursuant to Article 17(1)(c) and 17(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 391/2013, the Commission is to assess the unit rates for charging zones for 2015 submitted by the Member States to the Commission following the revision of performance targets as a result of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348. The assessment concerns the compliance of those unit rates with Implementing Regulations (EU) No 390/2013 and (EU) No 391/2013.

• Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/2021 of 17 December 2018 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 as regards the consistency of the revised targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency included in the amended national or functional airspace block plans submitted by Portugal and Romania (notified under document C(2018) 8489) (Text with EEA relevance) Decision · Grade B

  Following the assessment of the performance plans, the Commission adopted Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 which established, inter alia, that the local targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency of Portugal and Romania included in the performance plan of South-West FAB and Danube FAB, respectively, were consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period (2015-2019).

• Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/2021 of 17 December 2018 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 as regards the consistency of the revised targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency included in the amended national or functional airspace block plans submitted by Portugal and Romania (notified under document C(2018) 8489) (Text with EEA relevance) Decision · Grade B

  Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 should therefore be amended, so as to take account of the revised targets of Portugal and Romania.

• Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/2021 of 17 December 2018 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 as regards the consistency of the revised targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency included in the amended national or functional airspace block plans submitted by Portugal and Romania (notified under document C(2018) 8489) (Text with EEA relevance) Decision · Grade B

  The Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.

• Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/2376 of 15 December 2017 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 as regards the consistency of the revised targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency included in the amended national or functional airspace block plans submitted by Malta, Bulgaria and Poland (notified under document C(2017) 8433) (Text with EEA relevance) Decision · Grade B

  Following the assessment of the performance plans, the Commission adopted Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 which established, inter alia, that the targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency included in the performance plans submitted by Malta, Bulgaria and Poland were consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period (2015-2019).

• Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/2376 of 15 December 2017 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 as regards the consistency of the revised targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency included in the amended national or functional airspace block plans submitted by Malta, Bulgaria and Poland (notified under document C(2017) 8433) (Text with EEA relevance) Decision · Grade B

  Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 should therefore be amended, so as to take account of the revised targets of Bulgaria, Malta and Poland.

• Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/2376 of 15 December 2017 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 as regards the consistency of the revised targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency included in the amended national or functional airspace block plans submitted by Malta, Bulgaria and Poland (notified under document C(2017) 8433) (Text with EEA relevance) Decision · Grade B

  The Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

• Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1782 of 15 November 2018 allowing targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency for the years 2018 and 2019 for air navigation services of Romania and Portugal to be revised in accordance with Article 17(1) of Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 (notified under document C(2018) 7486) (only the Romanian and Portuguese texts are authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) Decision · Grade B

  The Commission adopted Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/348 which established, inter alia, that the local targets in the key performance area of cost-efficiency of Romania and Portugal included in the performance plan of Danube FAB and South-West FAB, respectively, were consistent with the Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period (2015-2019).