Gelex

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1115 of 7 July 2016 establishing a format for the submission by the European Chemicals Agency of information concerning the operation of the procedures pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the export and import of hazardous chemicals (notified under document C(2016) 4141)

In forceVersion 2016-07-07from 2016-07-09
Grade B

mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.

Ask Gelex about this law

Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/decision/2016/1115@2016-07-07/en

Contents
  1. Preamble
    1. Article 1
    2. Article 2
    3. Article 3
  3. ANNEX
  4. ANNEX QUESTIONNAIRE
    1. Section 2 Information on the Agency
    2. Section 3 Support to exporters and importers
    3. Section 4 Coordination between the Agency and the Commission/Designated National Authorities (DNAs)
    4. Section 5 Export notifications forwarded to Parties to the Rotterdam Convention and other countries
    5. Section 7 Information on export and import of chemicals
    6. Section 8 Obligations in relation to export of chemicals other than export notification
    7. Section 9 Exchange of information
    8. Section 10 Technical assistance
    9. Section 11 Enforcement of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012
    10. Section 12 IT-related aspects
  5. Section 5 Export notifications forwarded to Parties to the Rotterdam Convention and other countries
    1. Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on export of a chemical relating to an emergency situation
    2. Article 8(7) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on available additional information concerning exported chemicals

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 concerning the export and import of hazardous chemicals, and in particular Article 22(1) thereof,

After consulting the Committee established by Article 133 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC,

Whereas:

(1) In order to ensure that the information provided to the Commission by the European Chemicals Agency pursuant to Article 22(1) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 is of an appropriate standard, it is necessary to lay down a format to be used for the provision of such information.

(2) In order to ensure clarity and consistency, it is appropriate to specify the exact reporting periods for the provision of information by the European Chemicals Agency pursuant to Article 22(1) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The format for submission by the European Chemicals Agency of the information required under Article 22(1) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 shall be a questionnaire as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

The first report to be submitted by the European Chemicals Agency pursuant to Article 22(1) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 shall cover the calendar years 2014, 2015 and 2016.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the European Chemicals Agency.

Done at Brussels, 7 July 2016. For the Commission Karmenu Vella Member of the Commission

ANNEX

1. Organisation:

2. Period covered:

3. Human resources in the Agency (in full-time equivalent) working on the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012:

4. Is the Agency staff also involved in the implementation of other EU/international chemical legislation/conventions/programme? If yes, please specify which legislation and describe the issues/topics on which staff working on Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 collaborates with staff working on a different piece of legislation:

ANNEX QUESTIONNAIRE

Section 2 Information on the Agency

☐ Yes

☐ No

5. Is the Agency's workload in line with the predicted workload? Additional information:

☐ Yes

☐ No

6. In which of the following activities has the Agency set support and communication activities in place in order to assist exporters and importers in complying with Regulation (EU) No 649/2012? Additional information, if relevant:

Section 3 Support to exporters and importers

☐ Technical and scientific guidance

☐ Web pages on Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 and ePIC

☐ Internal messaging in ePIC

☐ Awareness-raising campaign

☐ Social media

☐ Visits to operator establishments

☐ Support to individual companies

☐ Workshops, webinars and similar training events

☐ IT user manuals, factsheets and Q&A (frequently asked questions)

☐ Others

7. Does the Agency consider that these support and communication activities have improved the compliance of exporters and importers with Regulation (EU) No 649/2012? Additional information:

☐ Yes

☐ No

8. What is the nature of the most frequent requests for support coming from exporters and importers? Additional information, including the number of requests received and an indication on the distribution of the questions across the topics.

☐ Chemicals subject to Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 and other scope-related issues

☐ Activation of reference identification numbers and related issues (e.g. export notification and explicit consent/waiver)

☐ Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on reporting

☐ ePIC functionality

☐ Others

9. Estimated amount of time spent on such support (expressed as a percentage of the total number of full-time equivalents):

10. Is the Agency satisfied with the collaboration with the Commission? Additional information:

Section 4 Coordination between the Agency and the Commission/Designated National Authorities (DNAs)

☐ Yes

☐ No

11. Areas in which collaboration could be improved, if any: Additional information:

☐ Article 6(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on drafting of decision guidance documents and other technical documents related to the implementation of the Convention

☐ Preparation of notifications of final regulatory action to the Rotterdam Convention Secretariat

☐ Technical preparation of meetings (e.g. DNA meetings, Chemical Review Committee, Conference of the Parties to the Rotterdam Convention)

☐ Participation in meetings (e.g. DNA meetings, Chemical Review Committee, Conference of the Parties to the Rotterdam Convention)

☐ Article 6(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on providing technical and scientific input in order to ensure the effective implementation of the Regulation

☐ Providing technical and scientific input and assistance concerning the Commission's role as common DNA of the Union

☐ Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on export in case of an emergency situation

☐ Article 14(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on decisions that the export can proceed in the absence of an explicit consent

☐ Article 20 of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on exchange of information

☐ Article 21 of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on technical assistance

☐ Article 23 of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on updating annexes

☐ Other

12. Is the Agency satisfied with the collaboration with the DNAs? Additional information:

☐ Yes

☐ No

13. Areas in which collaboration could be improved, if any: Additional information:

☐ Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on the timelines for processing export notifications

☐ Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on export in case of an emergency situation

☐ Article 8(7) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on additional information to provide on request concerning the exported chemical

☐ Article 14(6) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on substances that cannot be exported unless certain conditions are fulfilled

☐ Article 14(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on decisions that the export can proceed in the absence of an explicit consent

☐ Other

14. How many export notifications and related tasks have been handled by the Agency per year (i.e. the year in which the export took place)? Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Export notifications handled Export notifications forwarded Acknowledgments of receipt received Export notifications forwarded a second time

15. What are the information requirements requested in the export notification form where exporters experience difficulties? Additional information:

Section 5 Export notifications forwarded to Parties to the Rotterdam Convention and other countries

☐ Identity of the substance to be exported

☐ Identity of the mixture to be exported

☐ Identity of the article to be exported

☐ Information concerning the export

☐ Information on hazards and/or risks of the chemical and precautionary measures

☐ Summary of physico-chemical, toxicological and ecotoxicological properties

☐ Information on final regulatory action taken by the exporting country

☐ Additional information provided by the exporting Party

☐ Availability of CN codes or CUS codes

☐ Intended use of the chemical in the importing country

☐ Summary of and reasons for the final regulatory action and date of entry into force

☐ Others

☐ Not applicable

16. What is the number of export notifications sent back to the exporter for the reasons mentioned in the table below? Reason/Number per year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Re-submission requested Rejected If relevant, please specify the most frequent reasons for requesting re-submission and for rejecting export notifications: Reasons for requesting re-submission of export notifications: Reasons for rejecting export notifications:

17. Has the Agency noticed that the DNAs have experienced difficulties in coping with the time frame to forward the notifications to the Agency? If yes, how many notifications were received late during the reporting period and which percentage of the total number of notifications did this represent: Year No of late notifications % of total yearly No of notifications Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Additional information:

☐ Yes

☐ No

18. Has the Agency experienced difficulties in coping with the time frame to process and forward the notifications to the importing (non-EU) country? If yes, how many notifications were processed late during the reporting period and which percentage of the total number of notifications did this represent: Year No of late notifications % of total yearly No of notifications Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total

☐ Yes

☐ No

19. Has the Agency experienced difficulties when processing an export notification submitted under the emergency situation procedure? Additional information:

Section 5 Export notifications forwarded to Parties to the Rotterdam Convention and other countries

Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on export of a chemical relating to an emergency situation

☐ Yes

☐ No

☐ No such export notification has been received

20. Was the Agency requested to provide additional information concerning exported chemicals to importing parties and other countries? If yes, which type of information was requested:

Article 8(7) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 on available additional information concerning exported chemicals

☐ Yes

☐ No

21. How many export notifications did the Agency receive from non-EU countries in the reporting period? Notifications received Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total

22. How many acknowledgements of receipt for export notifications from non-EU countries did the Agency send in the reporting period? Acknowledgements sent Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total

23. Did the Agency experience delays from Designated National Authorities in receiving the aggregated national reports on the quantity of the chemicals (as a substance and as contained in mixtures or in articles) exported to/imported from each Party or other country during the preceding year? Additional information:

Section 7 Information on export and import of chemicals

☐ Yes

☐ No

24. Other than the above, did the Agency experience any issues with the Designated National Authorities in relation to the reporting exercise under Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012? Additional information:

☐ Yes

☐ No

25. Has the Agency experienced difficulties in relation to its involvement in the explicit consent procedure (e.g. in validating the explicit consent metadata inserted by the Designated National Authorities)? Additional information:

Section 8 Obligations in relation to export of chemicals other than export notification

☐ Yes

☐ No

26. Has the Agency experienced difficulties in processing export notifications subject to the procedure under Article 14(7) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 or in assisting the Commission in the implementation of this provision? Additional information:

☐ Yes

☐ No

27. How many reminders for explicit consent requests did the Agency send pursuant to the third subparagraph of Article 14(6) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012? First reminder Second reminder Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total

28. Has the Agency experienced difficulties in handling cases where the export was allowed to proceed pursuant to the second subparagraph pending a reply to a new request for explicit consent pursuant to point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 14(8) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012? Additional information:

☐ Yes

☐ No

29. In the context of Article 20(1) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012, has the Agency received any requests for providing information of scientific, technical, economic or legal nature concerning the chemicals subject to the regulation? If yes, please provide more details:

Section 9 Exchange of information

☐ Yes

☐ No

30. Did the Agency experience difficulties in collecting the information from the Commission and the Member States on the data transmitted? If yes, please provide more details:

☐ Yes

☐ No

31. Did the Agency experience difficulties in compiling the report in accordance with Article 20(4) of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012? If yes, please provide more details:

☐ Yes

☐ No

32. Has the Agency been involved in cooperation with developing countries, countries with economies in transition and non-governmental organisations to improve the proper management of chemicals and in particular to implement the Rotterdam Convention? If yes, what type of cooperation: If other, please specify. Please specify the countries benefiting from this cooperation: Additional information:

Section 10 Technical assistance

☐ Yes

☐ No

☐ Technical information

☐ Technical expertise for the identification of hazardous pesticides formulations

☐ Technical expertise for the preparation of notifications to the Secretariat

☐ Other

33. Has the Agency participated in projects/international activities related to capacity building in chemicals management or supported non-governmental organisations involved in such activities? If yes, please describe these activities:

☐ Yes

☐ No

34. Is there a regular exchange of information within the Forum on coordination of enforcement of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012? If yes, please specify the topics discussed. Additional information:

Section 11 Enforcement of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012

☐ Yes

☐ No

35. Has the Forum coordinated enforcement of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 in this reporting period? If yes, please describe these activities:

☐ Yes

☐ No

36. How could the activities of the Forum with regard to the enforcement of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 be improved?

37. Has the Agency been involved in any enforcement activities related to Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 other than those handled by the Forum? If yes, please describe these activities:

☐ Yes

☐ No

38. How many external organisations/users are using ePIC for each of the following categories?

Industry:

Designated National Authorities:

Commission:

Customs:

National Enforcement Authorities:

39. Which new/enhanced features have been included in ePIC compared to the previous reporting period: Additional information:

40. How many releases of the system were delivered in the reporting period:

41. Please provide details on the availability of the system to external users:

42. High-level summary of feedback received by the Agency on ePIC from the following user communities:

Industry:

Designated National Authorities:

Commission:

National Enforcement Authorities:

Customs:

43. Please specify identified improvement needs for the IT system, if any:

44. Which data originating from implementation of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 is made publicly available on the Agency's website:

45. Which new data has been made available since the last reporting period:

46. Has the Agency received any feedback on the data relating to implementation of Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 made available on its website? If yes, please provide a high-level summary of this feedback:

Section 12 IT-related aspects

☐ Yes

☐ No

47. Please provide any other information or comments related to the operation of the procedures under Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 that you consider relevant within the framework of the reporting pursuant to Article 22 of that Regulation.

Versions

  1. 2016-07-07