Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1148 of 28 June 2017 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine
Grade B
mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.
Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/decision/2017/1148@2017-06-28/en
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) On 31 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/512/CFSP.
(2) On 19 March 2015, the European Council agreed that the necessary measures would be taken to clearly link the duration of the restrictive measures to the complete implementation of the Minsk agreements, bearing in mind that the complete implementation was foreseen for 31 December 2015.
(3) On 19 December 2016, the Council renewed Decision 2014/512/CFSP until 31 July 2017 in order to enable it to further assess the implementation of the Minsk agreements.
(4) Having assessed the implementation of the Minsk agreements, Decision 2014/512/CFSP should be renewed for a further 6 months in order to enable the Council to further assess their implementation.
(5) Decision 2014/512/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP is replaced by the following:
1. This Decision shall apply until 31 January 2018..
Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Done at Brussels, 28 June 2017. For the Council The President H. Dalli
Versions
Cited by
- Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Sberbank of Russia v Council (Case T-732/14) Notice · Grade B
(Common foreign and security policyRestrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in UkraineApplicant’s name included and retained in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures applyError of assessmentObligation to state reasonsRights of the defenceRight to effective judicial protectionRight to propertyRight to carry on an economic activity)2018/C 392/17Language of the case: English Applicant: Sberbank of Russia OAO (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: D. Rose QC, M. Lester QC, J.-A. Fearns and P. Crowther, Solicitors) Defendant: Council of the Eu
- Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 13 September 2018 Judgment · Grade B
In Case T‑732/14, Sberbank of Russia OAO, established in Moscow (Russia), represented by D. Rose QC, M. Lester, QC, J.-A. Fearns and P. Crowther, Solicitors, applicant,v Council of the European Union, represented by S. Boelaert and J.‑P. Hix, acting as Agents, defendant, supported by European Commission, represented by D. Gauci, L. Havas and T. Scharf, acting as Agents, intervener, APPLICATION under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2
- Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 13 September 2018 Judgment · Grade B
The validity of Decision 2014/512 was extended until 31 January 2016, by Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/971 of 22 June 2015 amending Decision 2014/512 (OJ 2015 L 157, p. 50), and then until 31 July 2016 by Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2431 of 21 December 2015 amending Decision 2014/512 (OJ 2015 L 334, p. 22), until 31 January 2017 by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/1071 of 1 July 2016 amending Decision 2014/512 (OJ 2016 L 178, p. 21), until 31 July 2017 by Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/2315 of 19 December 2016 amending Decision 2014/512 (OJ 2016 L 345, p. 65), and lastly until 31 January 2018 by Cou
- Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 13 September 2018 Judgment · Grade B
By statement lodged at the Court Registry on 27 July 2017, the applicant modified its application so as also to include the annulment of Decision 2017/1148, in that that decision extended the applicability of the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2014/512, including the listing of the applicant’s name among the entities affected by those measures, until 31 January 2018.
- Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 13 September 2018 Judgment · Grade B
The applicant claims, in essence, that the Court should: annul (i) Decision 2014/512, as extended or amended by Decision 2014/659, Decision 2015/971, Decision 2015/2431, Decision 2016/1071, Decision 2016/2315 and Decision 2017/1148 (the contested decision) and (ii) the contested regulation (taken together, the contested acts), insofar as those acts concern the applicant; order the Council to pay the costs.