Gelex

Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/381 of 3 March 2017 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine

In forceVersion 2017-03-03from 2017-03-05
Grade B

mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.

Ask Gelex about this law

Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/decision/2017/381@2017-03-03/en

Contents
  1. Preamble
    1. Article 1
    2. Article 2
  3. ANNEX
  4. ANNEX

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

(1) On 5 March 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/119/CFSP.

(2) On 4 March 2016 the Council extended the restrictive measures against 16 persons until 6 March 2017.

(3) On the basis of a review of the restrictive measures set out in Decision 2014/119/CFSP, the application of those restrictive measures should be extended until 6 March 2018. The entry for one person listed in the Annex to Decision 2014/119/CFSP should be deleted.

(4) Decision 2014/119/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 2014/119/CFSP is amended as follows:

(1) in Article 5, the second paragraph is replaced by the following: This Decision shall apply until 6 March 2018.;

(2) the Annex is amended as set out in in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 March 2017. For the Council The President M. Farrugia

ANNEX

ANNEX

In the Annex to Decision 2014/119/CFSP the entry relating to the following person is deleted:

16. Yuriy Volodymyrovych Ivanyushchenko

Versions

  1. 2017-03-03

Cited by

  • Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 30 January 2019 Judgment · Grade B
    In Case T‑290/17, Edward Stavytskyi, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by J. Grayston, Solicitor, P. Gjørtler, G. Pandey and D. Rovetta, lawyers, applicant,v Council of the European Union, represented by V. Piessevaux and J.-P. Hix, acting as Agents, defendant, supported by European Commission, represented by E. Paasivirta and L. Baumgart, acting as Agents, intervener, APPLICATION under Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/381 of 3 March 2017 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entitie
  • Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 30 January 2019 Judgment · Grade B
    On 3 March 2017, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2017/381 amending Decision 2014/119 (OJ 2017 L 58, p. 34), and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/374 implementing Regulation No 208/2014 (OJ 2017 L 58, p. 1) (the contested measures), by which it extended until 6 March 2018 the application of the restrictive measures at issue, without altering the reasons given with regard to the applicant, as set out in paragraph 15 above.
  • Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 30 January 2019 Judgment · Grade B
    The Council contends that the Court should: dismiss the action; in the alternative, in the event of the annulment of the contested measures, maintain the effects of Decision 2017/381, until the annulment of Implementing Regulation 2017/374 takes effect, in accordance with Article 60 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union; order the applicant to pay the costs.
  • Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 30 January 2019 Judgment · Grade B
    With respect to the Council’s alternative claim, (see paragraph 36, second indent, above), seeking, in essence, that the effects of Decision 2017/381 be maintained until the expiry of the period of time allowed for bringing an appeal and, in the event that an appeal is lodged, until the decision ruling on that appeal, it is sufficient to observe that Decision 2017/381 was effective only until 6 March 2018. Consequently, the annulment of that decision by this judgment has no effect on the period after that date, so that it is not necessary to rule on the question of maintaining the effects of t
  • Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 30 January 2019 Judgment · Grade B
    Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/381 of 3 March 2017 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/374 of 3 March 2017 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine in so far as Mr Edward Stavytskyi’s name was maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures;
  • Order of the General Court of 8 November 2017 — Klymenko v Council (Case T-245/15) Notice · Grade B
    (Common foreign and security policyRestrictive measures taken in view of the situation in UkraineFreezing of fundsList of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resourcesMaintenance of the applicant’s name on the listDuty to state reasonsLegal basisManifest error of assessmentRights of defenceRight to propertyRight to reputationProportionalityProtection of fundamental rights equivalent to that guaranteed in the European UnionPlea of illegality)2018/C 005/37Language of the case: English Applicant: Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko (Moscow, Russia) (represented i
  • Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) 21 December 2021 Judgment · Grade B
    On 3 March 2017, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2017/381 amending Decision 2014/119 (OJ 2017 L 58, p. 34) and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/374 implementing Regulation No 208/2014 (OJ 2017 L 58, p. 1) (together, the March 2017 acts).
  • Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 October 2019 — Azarov v Council (Case C‑58/19 P) Judgment · Grade B
    European UnionJudicial review of the legality of the acts of the institutionsRestrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in UkraineFreezing of funds of persons involved in the misappropriation of public funds and of natural or legal persons, bodies or organisations associated with themAmbit of the review (Art. 275, second para., TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47; Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/381; Council Regulation 2017/374) (see paras 23-27, 40, 41)
  • Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 October 2019 — Azarov v Council (Case C‑58/19 P) Judgment · Grade B
    Common foreign and security policyRestrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in UkraineDecision to freeze fundsAdoption or maintenance on the basis of judicial proceedings brought by the authorities of a third State in relation to the misappropriation of public fundsWhether permissibleConditionNational decision adopted in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protectionCouncil’s verification obligationObligation to state reasonsScopeThird State that has acceded to the European Convention on Human RightsIrrelevant (Council Decision (CFSP) 2
  • Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 October 2019 — Azarov v Council (Case C‑58/19 P) Judgment · Grade B
    Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/381 of 3 March 2017 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine und Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/374 of 3 March 2017 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine are annulled to the extent to which they concern Mr Mykola Yanovych Azarov.
  • Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2018 — Lukash v Council (Case T-210/16) Notice · Grade B
    (Common foreign and security policyRestrictive measures taken in view of the situation in UkraineFreezing of fundsList of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resourcesMaintenance of the applicant’s name on the listObligation to state reasonsFailure to fulfil criteria for listingError of factError of assessmentRights of the defenceRight to an effective remedyRight to property)2018/C 249/27Language of the case: French Applicant: Olena Lukash (Kiev, Ukraine) (represented by: M. Cessieux, lawyer) Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Na
  • Action brought on 30 July 2021 — Klymenko v Council (Case T-470/21) Notice · Grade B
    Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/381 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/374 of 3 March 2017;
  • Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) 25 June 2020 Judgment · Grade B
    On 3 March 2017, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2017/381 amending Decision 2014/119 (OJ 2017 L 58, p. 34) and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/374 implementing Regulation No 208/2014 (OJ 2017 L 58, p. 1) (together, the March 2017 acts).
  • Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) 3 February 2021 Judgment · Grade B
    On 3 March 2017, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2017/381 amending Decision 2014/119 (OJ 2017 L 58, p. 34) and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/374 implementing Regulation No 208/2014 (OJ 2017 L 58, p. 1) (together, the March 2017 acts).
  • Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 September 2019 — Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union (Case C-11/18 P) Notice · Grade B
    Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/364 of 5 March 2015 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/357 of 5 March 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/318 of 4 March 2016 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bod
  • Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2018 — Arbuzov v Council (Case T-258/17) Notice · Grade B
    (Common foreign and security policyRestrictive measures taken in view of the situation in UkraineFreezing of fundsList of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resourcesMaintenance of the applicant’s name on the listObligation to state reasonsManifest error of assessment)2018/C 249/34Language of the case: Czech Applicant: Sergej Arbuzov (Kiev, Ukraine) (represented by: M. Mleziva, lawyer) Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Pekař and J.-P. Hix, acint as Agents) APPLICATION pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council De
  • Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2018 — Arbuzov v Council (Case T-258/17) Notice · Grade B
    Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/381 of 3 March 2017 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine in so far as Sergej Arbuzov’s name was maintained in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures;
  • Judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2018 — Sergiy Klyuyev v Council (Case T-731/15) Notice · Grade B
    (Common foreign and security policyRestrictive measures taken in view of the situation in UkraineFreezing of fundsList of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resourcesMaintenance of the applicant’s name on the listDuty to state reasonsLegal basisFactual basisManifest error of assessmentRights of defenceRight to propertyRight to reputationProportionalityProtection of fundamental rights equivalent to that guaranteed in the European UnionPlea of illegality)2018/C 123/20Language of the case: English Applicant: Sergiy Klyuyev (Donetsk, Ukraine) (represented by
  • Judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2018 — Sergiy Klyuyev v Council (Case T-731/15) Notice · Grade B
    Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/381 of 3 March 2017 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/374 of 3 March 2017 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine in so far as Mr Sergiy Klyuyev’s name was retained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures;
  • Judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2018 — Sergiy Klyuyev v Council (Case T-731/15) Notice · Grade B
    Orders the Council to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Klyuyev in relation to the claim for annulment in part of Decision 2017/381 and of Implementing Regulation 2017/374 made in the second statement of modification.