Decision (EU) 2018/7 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2017 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund following an application from Finland — EGF/2017/005 FI/Retail
Grade B
mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.
Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/decision/2018/7@2017-12-12/en
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014-2020) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, and in particular Article 15(4) thereof,
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management, and in particular point 13 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) aims to provide support for workers made redundant and self-employed persons whose activity has ceased as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation, as a result of a continuation of the global financial and economic crisis, or as a result of a new global financial and economic crisis, and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.
(2) The EGF is not to exceed a maximum annual amount of EUR 150 million (2011 prices), as laid down in Article 12 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013.
(3) On 12 June 2017, Finland submitted an application to mobilise the EGF, in respect of redundancies in 3 enterprises operating in the retail sectorin the following regions: Länsi Suomi, Helsinki-Uusimaa, Etelä-Suomi and Pohjois- ja Itä-Suomi in Finland. It was supplemented by additional information provided in accordance with Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013. That application complies with the requirements for determining a financial contribution from the EGF as laid down in Article 13 of Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013.
(4) The EGF should, therefore, be mobilised in order to provide a financial contribution of EUR 2499360 in respect of the application submitted by Finland.
(5) In order to minimise the time taken to mobilise the EGF, this decision should apply from the date of its adoption,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
For the general budget of the Union for the financial year 2017, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund shall be mobilised to provide the amount of EUR 2499360 in commitment and payment appropriations.
Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. It shall apply from 12 December 2017.
Done at Brussels, 12 December 2017. For the European Parliament The President A. Tajani For the Council The President K. Simson
Versions
Cited by
- P8_TA(2017)0457 Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2017/005 FI/Retail European Parliament resolution of 30 November 2017 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application from Finland — EGF/2017/005 FI/Retail) (COM(2017)0618 — C8-0364/2017 — 2017/2231(BUD)) 2018/C 356/39 Notice · Grade B
(The text of this annex is not reproduced here since it corresponds to the final act, Decision (EU) 2018/7.)
- Resolution (EU) 2022/1835 of the European Parliament of 4 May 2022 with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking (now the Europe’s Rail Joint Undertaking) for the financial year 2020 Act · Grade B
Notes that the Governing Board decision No 7/2018 adopting the rules on the prevention and management of conflicts of interests, applicable to the bodies of the Joint Undertaking, requires that up-to-date CVs and conflict of interest declarations of the Governing Board members are published on the Joint Undertaking’s website; notes from the Court’s report that, as only a few of the Governing Board members duly submitted the information, no conflict of interest declarations and only half of the CVs could be published by the end of 2020; notes from the Joint Undertaking’s that the Joint Undertak