Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/856 of 8 June 2018 amending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO)
Grade B
mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.
Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/decision/2018/856@2018-06-08/en
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28, Article 42(4) and Article 43(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas:
(1) On 4 February 2008, the Council adopted Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP.
(2) On 14 June 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/947, which amended Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP extending the mandate of EULEX KOSOVO until 14 June 2018.
(3) On 8 June 2017, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2017/973, amending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP providing a financial reference amount until 14 June 2018.
(4) Following the Strategic Review of the Mission, the Political and Security Committee recommended that the mandate of EULEX KOSOVO be amended and extended until 14 June 2020.
(5) It is necessary to provide for a new financial reference amount for the implementation of the mandate of EULEX KOSOVO until 14 June 2020.
(6) Nothing in this Decision is to be understood as prejudicing the independence and the autonomy of the judges and prosecutors.
(7) Due to the special character of the activities of EULEX KOSOVO in support of the relocated judicial proceedings within a Member State, it is appropriate to identify the amount envisaged to cover the support to the relocated judicial proceedings within a Member State and to provide for the implementation of that part of the budget through a grant.
(8) Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly.
(9) EULEX KOSOVO will be conducted in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union's external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP is hereby amended as follows:
(1) Article 2 is replaced by the following:
Article 1
(1)
Article 2 Mission Statement
EULEX KOSOVO shall support selected Kosovo rule of law institutions on their path towards increased effectiveness, sustainability, multi-ethnicity and accountability, free from political interference and in full compliance with international human rights standards and best European practices — through monitoring activities and limited executive functions as set out in Articles 3 and 3a — with the aim of handing over remaining tasks to other long-term EU instruments and phasing out residual executive functions.;
Article 1
(2) Article 3 is replaced by the following:
Article 1
(2)
Article 3 Tasks
In order to fulfil the Mission Statement set out in Article 2, EULEX KOSOVO shall:
(a) monitor selected cases and trials in Kosovo's criminal and civil justice institutions, in close coordination with other EU actors, while respecting the independence of the judiciary, and facilitate contacts and monitor relevant meetings within regional cooperation on cases concerning war crimes, corruption and serious and organised crime;
(b) provide operational support to the EU-facilitated Dialogue, as necessary;
(c) monitor, mentor and advise the Kosovo Correctional Service;
(d) retain certain limited executive responsibilities in the areas of forensic medicine and police, including security operations and a residual Witness Protection Programme and the responsibility to ensure the maintenance and promotion of public order and security including, as necessary, through reversing or annulling operational decisions taken by the competent Kosovo authorities;
(e) ensure that all its activities respect international standards concerning human rights and gender mainstreaming; and
(f) cooperate with relevant EU agencies, judicial and law enforcement authorities of Member States and third States in the execution of its mandate.;
Article 1
(3) in Article 16(1), the last subparagraph is replaced by the following: The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure of EULEX KOSOVO from 15 June 2018 until 14 June 2020 shall be EUR 169805000. Out of the amount referred to in the fourteenth subparagraph, the amount intended to cover the expenditure of EULEX KOSOVO for the implementation of its mandate in Kosovo shall be EUR 83555000 and the amount intended to cover the support to the relocated judicial proceedings within a Member State shall be EUR 86250000. The Commission shall sign a grant agreement with a registrar acting on behalf of a registry in charge of the administration of the relocated judicial proceedings for the amount of EUR 86250000. The rules on grants provided for in Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council shall apply to this grant agreement. The financial reference amount for the subsequent period for EULEX KOSOVO shall be decided by the Council.
(4) in Article 20(2), the first sentence is replaced by the following: It shall expire on 14 June 2020..
Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
Done at Luxembourg, 8 June 2018. For the Council The President I. Moskovski
Versions
Cited by
- Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2019/908 of 29 May 2019 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO) (EULEX KOSOVO/1/2019) Decision · Grade B
On 8 June 2018, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/856 amending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP and extending the duration of EULEX KOSOVO until 14 June 2020.
- Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2019/1991 of 28 November 2019 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO) (EULEX KOSOVO/2/2019) Decision · Grade B
On 8 June 2018, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/856 amending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP and extending the duration of EULEX KOSOVO until 14 June 2020.
- Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2018/869 of 5 June 2018 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO) (EULEX KOSOVO/1/2018) Decision · Grade B
On 8 June 2018, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/856, amending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP and extending the duration of EULEX KOSOVO until 14 June 2020.
- Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/792 of 11 June 2020 amending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX KOSOVO) Decision · Grade B
On 8 June 2018, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/856, amending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP and extending EULEX KOSOVO until 14 June 2020.
- Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 5 March 2020 Case C‑730/18 P SC v Eulex Kosovo Opinion · Grade B
Eulex Kosovo is a CSDP mission established by Council Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP of 4 February 2008 on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, Eulex Kosovo, as last amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/856 of 8 June 2018. Joint Action 2008/124 has been extended several times, and Eulex Kosovo’s current mandate runs until 14 June 2020. Eulex Kosovo is the largest civilian mission launched under the CSDP to date.
- Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 10 September 2024 Judgment · Grade B
Joint Action 2008/124 was also amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/856 of 8 June 2018 (OJ 2018 L 146, p. 5) (Joint Action 2008/124, as amended by Decision 2018/856).
- Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 10 September 2024 Judgment · Grade B
Article 2 of Joint Action 2008/124, as amended by Decision 2018/856, provides: [Eulex Kosovo] shall support selected Kosovo rule of law institutions on their path towards increased effectiveness, sustainability, multi-ethnicity and accountability, free from political interference and in full compliance with international human rights standards and best European practices – through monitoring activities and limited executive functions as set out in Articles 3 and 3a – with the aim of handing over remaining tasks to other long-term EU instruments and phasing out residual executive functions.
- Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 10 September 2024 Judgment · Grade B
Article 3(d) and (e) of Joint Action 2008/124, as amended by Decision 2018/856, provides: In order to fulfil the Mission Statement set out in Article 2, [Eulex Kosovo] shall: …
- Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 10 September 2024 Judgment · Grade B
Decision (CFSP) 2018/856
- Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 10 September 2024 Judgment · Grade B
In support of that action, KS and KD relied, in essence, on: a breach of Articles 2 and 3 ECHR and of Articles 2 and 4 of the Charter, committed by Eulex Kosovo, on account of the insufficient investigation of the disappearance and killing of their family members, owing to that mission’s lack of the necessary resources and appropriate personnel to perform its executive mandate, a breach found by the review panel on 11 November 2015 in respect of KS and on 19 October 2016 in respect of KD; a breach of Article 6(1) and Article 13 ECHR and of Article 47 of the Charter, owing to the absence of pro
- Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 10 September 2024 Judgment · Grade B
At the hearing, the Council added that it was necessary to analyse the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union in relation to the CFSP on a case-by-case basis, the latter institution having jurisdiction only to interpret or examine the legality of specific measures carrying out that policy, not acts of general application. In the present case, the Court of Justice of the European Union might have jurisdiction to examine whether Eulex Kosovo infringed KS’s and KD’s fundamental rights in the context of the investigations carried out by that mission, whereas the removal of the
- Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 10 September 2024 Judgment · Grade B
Fourth, the decision to remove the executive mandate of a CFSP mission, and in particular a CSDP mission, is directly related to such choices, for the purposes of Article 28(1) and Article 43(2) TEU. Accordingly, the General Court did not err in law in so far as it declared that it lacked jurisdiction to rule on the complaints concerning the removal of Eulex Kosovo’s executive mandate by Decision 2018/856, which terminated the obligation of that mission, enshrined in Article 3(d) of Joint Action 2008/124, to ensure that certain crimes are properly investigated, prosecuted, adjudicated and enfo
- Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 10 September 2024 Judgment · Grade B
That said, first, in the light of what is apparent from paragraphs 126 and 136 above, the General Court did not err in law in so far as it declared that it lacked jurisdiction to hear and determine that action to the extent that it concerned an alleged lack of resources on the part of Eulex Kosovo and the removal of the executive mandate of that mission by Decision 2018/856. Thus, a fortiori, the General Court could not have established that it had exclusive jurisdiction to rule in that regard.
- Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 25 September 2025 Judgment · Grade B
In the present case, the Court of Justice upheld the initial order in part, that is to say, in so far as the General Court had declared that it manifestly lacked jurisdiction to hear and determine the complaints claiming, first, the alleged lack of necessary resources allocated to the Eulex Kosovo mission and, second, the removal of the executive mandate of that mission pursuant to Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/856 of 8 June 2018 amending Joint Action 2008/124 (OJ 2018 L 146, p. 5) (paragraphs 126 and 136 of the judgment on appeal and paragraph 2 of the operative part of that judgment).
- Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 25 September 2025 Judgment · Grade B
As regards the latter paragraph, it is clear from the combined provisions of Articles 2 and 3 of the Joint Action, in particular Article 3(d) and (i), in the version prior to Decision 2018/856, that the adoption of individual measures capable of rectifying the infringements of fundamental rights found by the review panel cannot be dissociated from the implementation of the Eulex Kosovo mission’s mandate, in so far as that mandate consisted, first, of ensuring that cases of war crimes and other serious crimes are properly investigated, prosecuted and adjudicated, and, second, of ensuring that t
- Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) 25 September 2025 Judgment · Grade B
The same conclusion must be drawn in the light of the content of the provisions of Articles 2 and 3 of the Joint Action, and in particular Article 3(a) and (e) of that Joint Action, in the version resulting from Decision 2018/856, in accordance with which the Eulex Kosovo mission is to continue, first, to monitor selected cases and trials in Kosovo’s criminal and civil justice institutions, in close coordination with other EU actors, and to monitor relevant meetings within regional cooperation on cases concerning war crimes, and, second, to ensure that all its activities respect international
- Action brought on 29 December 2020 — KS and KD v Council and Others (Case T-771/20) Notice · Grade B
a misuse or failure to use executive power properly insofar as Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/856 removed the executive mandate of EULEX on 8 June 2018, whilst the violations remained extant.
- Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 23 November 2023 Joined Cases C‑29/22 P and C‑44/22 P KS, KD v Council of the European Union (C‑29/22 P) European Commission (C‑29/22 P) European External Action Service (EEAS) (C‑29/22 P) and European Commission v KS, KD, Council of the European Union (C‑44/22 P) European External Action Service (EEAS) (C‑44/22 P) Opinion · Grade B
KS and KD claimed the following six violations: violation of Articles 2 and 3 ECHR and the corresponding Articles 2 and 4 of the Charter by Eulex Kosovo; violation of Article 6(1) and Article 13 ECHR and Article 47 of the Charter for failure to make provision for legal aid; failure to take remedial action when the findings of the HRRP were brought to the attention of the European Union by the Head of Mission of Eulex Kosovo on 29 April 2016; misuse or abuse of executive power by the Council and the EEAS on 12 October 2017 by the assertion that Eulex Kosovo had done its best to investigate the
- P8_TA(2018)0479 2018 Report on Kosovo European Parliament resolution of 29 November 2018 on the 2018 Commission Report on Kosovo (2018/2149(INI)) 2020/C 363/19 Notice · Grade B
having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/856 of 8 June 2018 amending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX Kosovo), which also extended the mission’s duration until 14 June 2020,