Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 of 30 April 2021 on the security of systems and services deployed, operated and used under the Union Space Programme which may affect the security of the Union, and repealing Decision 2014/496/CFSP
Grade B
mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.
Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/decision/2021/698@2021-04-30/en
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
Whereas
(1) In view, in particular, of its strategic dimension, regional and global coverage and multiple usage, the European Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) constitutes sensitive infrastructure the deployment and usage of which are susceptible to affect the security of the Union and its Member States.
(2) Where the international situation requires operational action by the Union and where the operation of the GNSS could affect the security of the Union or its Member States, or in the event of a threat to the operation of the GNSS, the Council should decide on the necessary measures to be taken.
(3) For this reason, the Council adopted Decision 2014/496/CFSP.
(4) Regulation (EU) 2021/696 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishes the Union Space Programme (the Programme) and the European Union Agency for the Space Programme (the Agency). Article 3 thereof provides that the Programme consists of five components: a global navigation satellite system (Galileo); a regional satellite navigation system (EGNOS); an Earth observation system (Copernicus); a space surveillance and tracking system complemented by observational parameters related to space weather and near-Earth objects (space situational awareness); and a satellite communications service (GOVSATCOM).
(5) Space technology, data and services have become indispensable to the daily lives of Europeans and play an essential role in preserving many strategic interests of the Union and its Member States. In addition, space-related systems and services themselves are potential targets for security threats.
(6) A range of potential threats to the security and the essential interests of the Union and of its Member States could arise from the deployment, operation and use of each of the components of the Programme. It is therefore appropriate to extend the scope of Decision 2014/496/CFSP to the systems and services set up under those components that have been determined as security-sensitive by the security configuration of the committee established under Article 107(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 and taking into account the differences between the components of the Programme, in particular as regards Member States’ authority and control over sensors, systems or other capacities relevant to the Programme.
(7) Lessons have been drawn from the experience acquired in implementing Decision 2014/496/CFSP in recent years. The operational procedure foreseen in Decision 2014/496/CFSP should therefore be adapted accordingly.
(8) Information and expertise concerning whether an event related to a space-related system or service constitutes a threat to the Union, to the Member States or to the space-related systems and services should be provided to the Council and to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (the High Representative) by the Agency or by the relevant structure designated, where appropriate, to monitor the security of a system set up, or a service provided, under a component of the Programme pursuant to Article 34(4) of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 (appointed security monitoring structure), or by Member States or by the European Commission. In addition, third States may also provide such information.
(9) The respective roles of the Council, the High Representative, the Agency, any appointed security monitoring structure and the Member States should be clarified within the chain of operational responsibilities to be set up in order to react to a threat to the Union, to the Member States or to any of the systems and services set up under the Programme.
(10) Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 establishes that the Commission has overall responsibility for the implementation of the Programme, including in the field of security. This Decision should define the responsibilities of the Council and of the High Representative to avert threats arising from the deployment, operation and use of space-related systems and services, or in the event of a threat to those systems or services.
(11) In this regard, the basic references to threats are contained in the System-specific Security Requirement Statements which contain the main generic threats to be addressed by each component of the Programme, and the respective System Security Plans which include the security risk registers set up in the security accreditation processes for each component. Those basic references will serve as references to identify the threats specifically to be dealt with by this Decision and to complete the operational procedures for the implementation of this Decision.
(12) In urgent cases, decisions may have to be taken within a few hours of receipt of information concerning a threat. If the circumstances do not allow for the Council to take a decision in order to avert a threat or to mitigate serious harm to the essential interests of the Union or of one or more of its Member States, or in the event of a threat to the space-related systems or services, the High Representative should be empowered to issue the necessary provisional instructions. In such circumstances, the Council should be informed immediately and review the provisional instructions as soon as possible.
(13) In accordance with Article 34(5)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2021/696, the Agency, within its area of responsibility, should ensure the operation of the Galileo Security Monitoring Centre (GSMC) in accordance with the requirements referred to in paragraph 2 of that Article and the instructions developed under the scope of this Decision. In accordance with Article 79(1)(j) of Regulation (EU) 2021/696, the Agency’s Executive Director should ensure that the Agency, as the operator of the GSMC, is able to respond to instructions provided under this Decision.
(14) The relevant appointed security monitoring structures should operate in accordance with the security requirements referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 34(2) of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 and with the instructions developed under this Decision.
(15) In addition, Decision No 1104/2011/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council lays down the rules under which the Member States, the Council, the Commission, the European External Action Service, Union agencies, third States and international organisations may access the public regulated service provided by the global navigation satellite system established under the Galileo programme. In particular, Article 6 of Decision No 1104/2011/EU states that the GSMC provides the operational interface between the competent public regulated service authorities, the Council and the High Representative and the control centres,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
1. This Decision sets out the responsibilities to be exercised by the Council and the High Representative:
(a) to avert a threat to the security of the Union or of one or more of its Member States or to mitigate serious harm to the essential interests of the Union or of one or more of its Member States arising from the deployment, operation or use of the systems set up and services provided under the components of the Union Space Programme (the Programme); or
(b) in the event of a threat to the operation of any of those systems or the provision of those services.
2. In the implementation of this Decision, due account shall be given to the differences between the components of the Programme, in particular as regards Member States’ authority and control over sensors, systems or other capacities relevant to the Programme.
Article 2
1. In the event of such a threat, the Member States, the Commission, the European Union Agency for the Space Programme (the Agency) or any security monitoring structure appointed in accordance with Article 34(4) of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 (appointed security monitoring structure), as appropriate, shall immediately inform the High Representative of all the elements at their disposal which they consider relevant.
2. The High Representative shall immediately inform the Council of the threat and of its potential impact on the security of the Union or of one or more of its Member States and on the operation of the systems or the provision of the services concerned.
Article 3
1. The Council, acting unanimously upon a proposal from the High Representative, shall decide on the necessary instructions to the Agency or to any appointed security monitoring structure, as appropriate.
2. The Agency or the relevant appointed security monitoring structure and the Commission shall provide advice to the High Representative on the likely wider impact on the systems set up and services provided under the components of the Programme of any instructions which the High Representative intends to propose to the Council pursuant to paragraph 1.
3. The proposal from the High Representative referred to in paragraph 1 shall include an impact assessment of the proposed instructions.
4. The Political and Security Committee (PSC) shall provide an opinion to the Council on any instructions proposed, as appropriate.
Article 4
1. If the urgency of the situation requires immediate action to be taken before the Council has taken a decision under Article 3(1), the High Representative is authorised to issue the necessary provisional instructions to the Agency or to the relevant appointed security monitoring structure. The High Representative may direct the Secretary-General of the European External Action Service to issue such instructions to the Agency or to the relevant appointed security monitoring structure on the High Representative’s behalf.
2. The High Representative shall immediately inform the Council and the Commission of any instructions issued pursuant to paragraph 1.
3. The Council shall confirm, modify or revoke the provisional instructions of the High Representative as soon as possible.
4. The High Representative shall keep those provisional instructions under constant review, amend them as appropriate or revoke them if immediate action is no longer required. In any event, the provisional instructions shall expire four weeks after being issued, or upon a decision by the Council pursuant to paragraph 3.
Article 5
1. Within a year after the security configuration of the committee established under Article 107(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 has determined, on the basis of the risk and threat analysis performed by the Commission pursuant to Article 34(2) of Regulation (EU) 2021/696, under the procedure referred to in Article 107(3) thereof, whether a system set up or a service provided, or both, under a particular component of the Programme is security-sensitive, the High Representative shall prepare, and submit for approval to the PSC, the necessary operational procedures for the practical implementation of the provisions set out in this Decision as regards the system or service concerned, or both. For that purpose, the High Representative shall be supported by experts from Member States, the Commission, the Agency and the relevant appointed security monitoring structure, as appropriate.
2. The operational procedures referred to in paragraph 1 may include predefined instructions to be implemented by the Agency or any relevant appointed security monitoring structure, as appropriate.
3. The operational procedures shall be reviewed by the High Representative at least every two years, in particular as a result of a lessons-learned review process following a yearly exercise on the implementation of this Decision, or at the request of a Member State, and shall be submitted to the PSC for approval.
4. The High Representative shall inform the PSC at least once a year on the ongoing activities carried out for the practical implementation of this Decision.
Article 6
1. In accordance with international agreements concluded by the Union or by the Union and its Member States, including those granting access to the public regulated service pursuant to Article 3(5) of Decision No 1104/2011/EU, the High Representative shall have the authority to conclude administrative arrangements with third States concerning cooperation for the purpose of implementing this Decision. Such arrangements shall be subject to approval by the Council acting unanimously.
2. If such arrangements require access to Union classified information, the release or exchange of classified information shall be approved in accordance with the applicable security rules.
Article 7
The Council shall review and, as necessary, amend the rules and procedures set out in this Decision no later than three years from the date of its entry into force, or at the request of a Member State.
Article 8
The Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure the implementation of this Decision in their respective area of responsibility, in accordance with, inter alia, Article 34(6)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2021/696. For that purpose, the Member States shall designate one or more points of contact to assist in the operational management of a threat. Those points of contact may be natural or legal persons.
Article 9
Decision 2014/496/CFSP is hereby repealed. The operational procedures developed under Decision 2014/496/CFSP as regards the Galileo system shall remain applicable until they are updated under this Decision.
Article 10
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. It shall apply from 1 January 2021.
Done at Brussels, 30 April 2021. For the Council The President A. P. Zacarias
Versions
Cited by
- Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/2195 of 28 September 2026 on the European Union Space Threat Response Architecture (STRA) and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 Decision · Grade B
Drawing from the experience acquired in recent years in implementing Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/698, it is therefore necessary to reinforce the European Union Space Threat Response Architecture (STRA) with additional responses and to expand its scope to address new threats in the space domain.
- Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/2195 of 28 September 2026 on the European Union Space Threat Response Architecture (STRA) and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 Decision · Grade B
Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 is hereby repealed. The operational procedures developed under Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 shall remain applicable until they are updated under this Decision.
- Council Decision (EU) 2024/3226 of 16 December 2024 authorising the opening of negotiations with the Kingdom of Norway for an agreement laying down the rules for the participation of the Kingdom of Norway in the GOVSATCOM component of the Union Space Programme and in the Union Secure Connectivity Programme, and for access to governmental services Decision · Grade B
Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 sets out the responsibilities to be exercised by the Council and the High Representative to avert a threat to the security of the Union or of one or more of its Member States or to mitigate serious harm to the essential interests of the Union or of one or more of its Member States arising from the deployment, operation or use of the systems set up and services provided under GOVSATCOM, as a component of the Union Space Programme, or the Union Secure Connectivity Programme, or in the event of a threat to the operation of any of those systems or the provision of
- Council Decision (EU) 2025/538 of 11 March 2025 authorising the opening of negotiations with Iceland for an agreement laying down the rules for the participation of Iceland in the GOVSATCOM component of the Union Space Programme and in the Union Secure Connectivity Programme, and for access to governmental services Decision · Grade B
Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 sets out the responsibilities to be exercised by the Council and the High Representative to avert a threat to the security of the Union or of one or more of its Member States or to mitigate serious harm to the essential interests of the Union or of one or more of its Member States arising from the deployment, operation or use of the systems set up and services provided under GOVSATCOM, as a component of the Union Space Programme, or the Union Secure Connectivity Programme, or in the event of a threat to the operation of any of those systems or the provision of
- Regulation (EU) 2021/696 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing the Union Space Programme and the European Union Agency for the Space Programme and repealing Regulations (EU) No 912/2010, (EU) No 1285/2013 and (EU) No 377/2014 and Decision No 541/2014/EU Regulation · Grade B
Without prejudice to Member States’ prerogatives in the area of national security, the Commission and the High Representative, each within their respective area of competence, should ensure the security of the Programme in accordance with this Regulation and, where relevant, Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/698.
- Regulation (EU) 2021/696 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing the Union Space Programme and the European Union Agency for the Space Programme and repealing Regulations (EU) No 912/2010, (EU) No 1285/2013 and (EU) No 377/2014 and Decision No 541/2014/EU Regulation · Grade B
A security monitoring structure should be identified by the Commission when appropriate after the risk and threat analysis. That security monitoring structure should be the entity responding to instructions developed under the scope of Decision (CFSP) 2021/698. For Galileo, that body should be the Galileo Security Monitoring Centre. With regard to the implementation of Decision (CFSP) 2021/698, the role of the Security Accreditation Board should be limited to providing the Council or the High Representative with inputs linked to the security accreditation of the system.
- Regulation (EU) 2021/696 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing the Union Space Programme and the European Union Agency for the Space Programme and repealing Regulations (EU) No 912/2010, (EU) No 1285/2013 and (EU) No 377/2014 and Decision No 541/2014/EU Regulation · Grade B
Based on the risk and threat analysis, the Commission shall, where appropriate, identify a structure to monitor security and to follow the instructions developed under the scope of Decision (CFSP) 2021/698. The structure shall operate in accordance with the security requirements referred to in paragraph 2. For Galileo, that structure shall be the Galileo Security Monitoring Centre.
- Regulation (EU) 2021/696 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing the Union Space Programme and the European Union Agency for the Space Programme and repealing Regulations (EU) No 912/2010, (EU) No 1285/2013 and (EU) No 377/2014 and Decision No 541/2014/EU Regulation · Grade B
ensure the operation of the Galileo Security Monitoring Centre in accordance with the requirements referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article and the instructions developed under the scope of Decision (CFSP) 2021/698;
- Regulation (EU) 2021/696 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing the Union Space Programme and the European Union Agency for the Space Programme and repealing Regulations (EU) No 912/2010, (EU) No 1285/2013 and (EU) No 377/2014 and Decision No 541/2014/EU Regulation · Grade B
Whenever the security of the Union or its Member States may be affected by the operation of the systems, the procedures set out in Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 shall apply.
- Regulation (EU) 2021/696 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing the Union Space Programme and the European Union Agency for the Space Programme and repealing Regulations (EU) No 912/2010, (EU) No 1285/2013 and (EU) No 377/2014 and Decision No 541/2014/EU Regulation · Grade B
assisting, in close liaison with the Commission, the Council and the High Representative, with the implementation of Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 upon a specific request from the Council or the High Representative;
- Regulation (EU) 2021/696 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing the Union Space Programme and the European Union Agency for the Space Programme and repealing Regulations (EU) No 912/2010, (EU) No 1285/2013 and (EU) No 377/2014 and Decision No 541/2014/EU Regulation · Grade B
ensure that the Agency, as the operator of the Galileo Security Monitoring Centre, is able to respond to instructions provided under Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 and to fulfil its role as referred to in Article 6 of Decision No 1104/2011/EU;
- Council Decision (EU) 2026/587 of 9 March 2026 authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and Ukraine laying down the rules for the participation of Ukraine in the GOVSATCOM component of the Union Space Programme and in the Union Secure Connectivity Programme, and for access to GOVSATCOM services and to the governmental services of the Union Secure Connectivity Programme Decision · Grade B
Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 sets out the responsibilities to be exercised by the Council and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (the High Representative) to avert a threat to the security of the Union or of one or more of its Member States or to mitigate serious harm to the essential interests of the Union or of one or more of its Member States arising from the deployment, operation or use of the systems set up and services provided under GOVSATCOM, as a component of the Union space programme, or the Union Secure Connectivity Programme, or in the
- Council Decision (EU) 2026/587 of 9 March 2026 authorising the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and Ukraine laying down the rules for the participation of Ukraine in the GOVSATCOM component of the Union Space Programme and in the Union Secure Connectivity Programme, and for access to GOVSATCOM services and to the governmental services of the Union Secure Connectivity Programme Decision · Grade B
IMPLEMENTATION, REVIEW AND AMENDMENT The agreement should contain a provision on the duration of the agreement; A Joint Committee should be established to oversee the implementation of the agreement; An amendment procedure should be included in the agreement; A review process should be included, which could provide for the possibility of extending the duration of the agreement; Termination, dispute settlement and suspension clauses should be inserted, including the unilateral suspension by the EU if the security of the Union is affected and Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 needs to be activate
- Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/598 of 14 March 2023 amending Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 to include the Union Secure Connectivity Programme Decision · Grade B
It is therefore appropriate to extend the scope of Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 to the systems and services set up under the Union Secure Connectivity Programme,
- Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/598 of 14 March 2023 amending Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 to include the Union Secure Connectivity Programme Decision · Grade B
the title is replaced by the following: Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 of 30 April 2021 on the security of systems and services deployed, operated and used under the Union Space Programme and the Union Secure Connectivity Programme which may affect the security of the Union, and repealing Decision 2014/496/CFSP;
- Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/598 of 14 March 2023 amending Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 to include the Union Secure Connectivity Programme Decision · Grade B
Decision (CFSP) 2021/698 is amended as follows:
- Council Recommendation of 6 June 2025 on an EU blueprint for cyber crisis management C/2025/3445 Notice · Grade B
Relevant Union-level crisis management mechanisms and platforms Mechanism Horizontal/ sector/ cyber-specific Description Reference ARGUS Horizontal The Commission's coordination process and general alert system for a coherent response in the event of a major transboundary crisis requiring action at the EU level. It brings together all the relevant services and Cabinets to decide on and coordinate measures. Allows the Commission to exchange relevant information on emerging multisectoral crises or foreseeable or imminent threats that require Union-level action. Commission Communication (2005)662
- Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/1245 of 15 July 2022 laying down rules and procedures for the application of Regulation (EU) 2021/696 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the participation of Member States in the SST sub-component, the establishment of the SST Partnership and the development of the initial key performance indicators Decision · Grade B
Adequacy to comply with instructions issued in accordance with Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/698.
- Regulation (EU) 2023/588 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2023 establishing the Union Secure Connectivity Programme for the period 2023-2027 Regulation · Grade B
Where appropriate, after the risk and threat analysis, the Commission should identify a security monitoring structure. That security monitoring structure should be the entity responding to instructions developed under the scope of Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/698.
- Regulation (EU) 2023/588 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2023 establishing the Union Secure Connectivity Programme for the period 2023-2027 Regulation · Grade B
Without prejudice to Member States’ prerogatives in the area of national security, the Commission and the High Representative, each within their respective field of competence, should ensure the security of the Programme in accordance with this Regulation and, where relevant, Decision (CFSP) 2021/698.