Order of the Court of 25 January 2024 –CEDC International v EUIPO (Case C‑553/23 P)
Grade B
mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.
Not the law itself: Judgment
Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/judgment/62023CO0553_INF@2024-01-25/en
1. AppealScheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceedIssue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU lawBurden of proof (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 170a(1) and 170b) (see paragraph 12)
2. AppealScheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceedRequest that an appeal be allowed to proceedFormal requirementsScope (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 170a(1) and 170b) (see paragraphs 13-15)
3. AppealScheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceedIssue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU lawRequest that an appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate that the issue is significantArguments of a general natureAppeal not allowed to proceed (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 170a(1) and 170b) (see paragraphs 16-18)
4. AppealScheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceedIssue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU lawIssue that has not been examined by the CourtRequest that an appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate that the issue is significantAppeal not allowed to proceed (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 170a(1) and 170b) (see paragraph 19)
5. AppealScheme for prior determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceedIssue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU lawInadequate or contradictory groundsRequest that an appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate that the issue is significantAppeal not allowed to proceed (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 170a(1) and 170b) (see paragraph 20)
Operative part
1. The appeal is not allowed to proceed.
2. CEDC International sp. z o.o. shall bear its own costs.