Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 October 2025 –Wyrębski v EUIPO –Gagatek-Woźniak and Others (RED BRAND CHICKEN) (Case T‑45/25)
Grade B
mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.
Not the law itself: Judgment
Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/judgment/62025TO0045_INF@2025-10-13/en
1. EU trade markProcedural provisionsStatement of reasons for decisionsFirst sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001Scope identical to that of Article 296 TFEURecourse by the Board of Appeal to implicit reasoningWhether permissibleConditions (Art. 296 TFEU; European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 94(1), first sentence) (see paragraphs 25-27)
2. Action for annulmentJudgment annulling a measureEffectsObligation to adopt compliance measuresScopeBoth the operative part and the grounds of the judgment to be taken into accountRetroactive effect of annulment (Art. 266 TFEU; European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 72(6)) (see paragraphs 38, 39, 46)
3. Judicial proceedingsRes judicataScope (see paragraphs 40, 48)
Operative part
1. The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
2. Mr Grzegorz Wyrębski shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by Ms Anna Gagatek-Woźniak, Mr Artur Woźniak and Ms Jolanta Mozerys.
3. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.