Report on the annual accounts of the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency for the financial year 2015, together with the Agency’s reply 2016/C 449/09
Grade B
mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.
Not the law itself: Notice
Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/notice/oj/C/2016/449/09@2016-09-13/en
The Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (hereinafter the Agency, aka EACEA), which is located in Brussels, was established by Commission Implementing Decision No 2013/776/EU repealing Decision No 2009/336/EC. The Agency’s task is to manage programmes decided by the Commission in the educational, audiovisual and cultural fields, including undertaking the detailed implementation of technical projects. The table presents key figures for the Agency. Source: data provided by the Agency. 2014 2015 Budget (million euro) 46,9 46,9 Total staff as at 31 December 437 441 The audit approach taken by the Court comprises analytical audit procedures, direct testing of transactions and an assessment of key controls of the Agency’s supervisory and control systems. This is supplemented by evidence provided by the work of other auditors (where relevant) and an analysis of management representations. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Court has audited:
(a) the annual accounts of the Agency, which comprise the financial statements and the reports on the implementation of the budget for the financial year ended 31 December 2015; and
(b) the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts.
The management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the annual accounts of the Agency and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions:
(a) The management’s responsibilities in respect of the Agency’s annual accounts include designing, implementing and maintaining an internal control system relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies on the basis of the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer; making accounting estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances. The Director approves the annual accounts of the Agency after its accounting officer has prepared them on the basis of all available information and established a note to accompany the accounts in which he declares, inter alia, that he has reasonable assurance that they present a true and fair view of the financial position of the Agency in all material respects.
(b) The management’s responsibilities in respect of the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions and compliance with the principle of sound financial management consist of designing, implementing and maintaining an effective and efficient internal control system comprising adequate supervision and appropriate measures to prevent irregularities and fraud and, if necessary, legal proceedings to recover funds wrongly paid or used.
The Court’s responsibility is, on the basis of its audit, to provide the European Parliament and the Council with a statement of assurance as to the reliability of the annual accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. The Court conducts its audit in accordance with the IFAC International Standards on Auditing and Codes of Ethics and the INTOSAI International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions. These standards require the Court to plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the annual accounts of the Agency are free from material misstatement and the transactions underlying them are legal and regular. The audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, which is based on an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the accounts and material non-compliance by the underlying transactions with the requirements in the legal framework of the European Union, whether due to fraud or error. In assessing these risks, the auditor considers any internal controls relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the accounts, as well as the supervisory and control systems that are implemented to ensure the legality and regularity of underlying transactions, and designs audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. The audit also entails evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies, the reasonableness of accounting estimates and the overall presentation of the accounts. The Court considers that the audit evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for its statement of assurance. In the Court’s opinion, the Agency’s annual accounts present fairly, in all material respects, its financial position as at 31 December 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the provisions of its Financial Regulation and the accounting rules adopted by the Commission’s accounting officer. In the Court’s opinion, the transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year ended 31 December 2015 are legal and regular in all material respects. The comments which follow do not call the Court’s opinions into question. Carry-overs of committed appropriations were high for Title III (support to agency operations) at 2,8 million euro, i.e. 50 % (2014: 3,2 million euro, i.e. 56 %). They mainly relate to ongoing project audits (1 million euro), IT services (0,8 million euro), information communication and publication services (0,5 million euro) as well as translations (0,2 million euro) which were ordered in 2015 but not yet invoiced at year-end or will only be delivered in 2016. An overview of the corrective actions taken in response to the Court’s comments from previous years is provided in the Annex. This Report was adopted by Chamber IV, headed by Mr Baudilio TOMÉ MUGURUZA, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 13 September 2016. For the Court of Auditors Vítor Manuel da Silva Caldeira President
ANNEX
ANNEX Follow-up of previous years’ comments
Year Court's comment Status of corrective action (Completed/Ongoing/Outstanding/N/A) 2014 The overall level of committed appropriations was high at 98 % (97 % in 2013). Carry-overs of committed appropriations were also high for Title III (support to agency operations) at 56 %, i.e. 3,2 million euro. They mainly relate to IT services ordered in 2014 but not yet invoiced at year-end (1,2 million euro), ongoing project audits (1 million euro) and to communication, publication and translation services (0,9 million euro) related to new programmes managed by the Agency. N/A
THE AGENCY’S REPLY
The Agency takes note of the Court’s comments. The Agency will continue the efforts put in place to control the rate of carry-over.