Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/regulation/2004/847@2004-04-29/en

Contents

1. Preamble
2. 1. Article 1 Notification to the Commission
   2. Article 2 Consultation of stakeholders and participation in negotiations
   3. Article 3 Prohibition on introducing more restrictive arrangements
   4. Article 4 Conclusion of agreements
   5. Article 5 Distribution of traffic rights
   6. Article 6 Publication of procedures
   7. Article 7 Committee procedure
   8. Article 8 Confidentiality
   9. Article 9 Gibraltar
   10. Article 10 Entry into force

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 80(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee

Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty,

Whereas:

(1) International aviation relations between Member States and third countries have been traditionally governed by bilateral air service agreements between Member States and third countries, their Annexes and other related bilateral or multilateral arrangements.

(2) Following the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in cases C-466/98, C-467/98, C-468/98, C-469/98, C-471/98, C-472/98, C-475/98 and C-476/98, the Community has exclusive competence with respect to various aspects of such agreements.

(3) The Court has also clarified the right of Community air carriers to benefit from the right of establishment within the Community, including the right to non-discriminatory market access.

(4) Where it is apparent that the subject-matter of an agreement falls partly within the competence of the Community and partly within that of its Member States, it is essential to ensure close cooperation between the Member States and the Community institutions, both in the process of negotiation and conclusion and in the fulfilment of the commitments entered into. That obligation to cooperate flows from the requirement of unity in the international representation of the Community. The Community institutions and the Member States should take all necessary steps to ensure the best possible cooperation in that regard.

(5) The cooperation procedure between Member States and the Commission established by this Regulation should be without prejudice to the division of competencies between the Community and Member States, in accordance with Community law as interpreted by the Court of Justice.

(6) All existing bilateral agreements between Member States and third countries that contain provisions contrary to Community law should be amended or replaced by new agreements that are wholly compatible with Community law.

(7) Without prejudice to the Treaty, and in particular Article 300 thereof, Member States may wish to make amendments to existing agreements and make provision to manage their implementation until such time as an agreement concluded by the Community enters into force.

(8) It is essential to ensure that a Member State conducting negotiations takes account of Community law, broader Community interests and ongoing Community negotiations.

(9) If a Member State wishes to involve air carriers in the process of negotiation, all air carriers with an establishment in the territory of the Member State concerned should be treated equally.

(10) Establishment on the territory of a Member State implies the effective and real exercise of air transport activity through stable arrangements; the legal form of such an establishment, whether a branch or a subsidiary with a legal personality, should not be the determining factor in this respect. When an undertaking is established on the territory of several Member States, as defined by the Treaty, it should ensure, in order to avoid any circumvention of national law, that each of the establishments fulfils the obligations which may, in accordance with Community law, be imposed by the national law applicable to its activities.

(11) In order to ensure that the rights of Community air carriers are not unduly restricted, no new arrangements that reduce the number of Community air carriers which may be designated to provide air services in a given market should be introduced in bilateral air service agreements.

(12) Member States should establish non-discriminatory and transparent procedures for the distribution of traffic rights between Community air carriers. In applying those procedures Member States should have due regard to the need to preserve continuity of air services.

(13) The measures necessary for the implementation of this Regulation should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 19.99 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission.

(14) Any Member State may invoke the confidentiality of the provisions of bilateral agreements it has negotiated and request the Commission not to share the information with other Member States.

(15) Arrangements for greater cooperation over the use of Gibraltar airport were agreed in London on 2 December 1987 by the Kingdom of Spain and the United Kingdom in a joint declaration by the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the two countries. Such arrangements have yet to enter into operation.

(16) Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely the coordination of negotiations with third countries with a view to concluding air service agreements, the necessity to guarantee a harmonised approach in the implementation and application of those agreements and the verification of their compliance with Community law, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the Community-wide scope of this Regulation, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1 Notification to the Commission

1. A Member State may, without prejudice to the respective competencies of the Community and its Member States, enter into negotiations with a third country concerning a new air service agreement or the modification of an existing air service agreement, its Annexes or any other related bilateral or multilateral arrangement, the subject matter of which falls partly within the competence of the Community, provided that: Where appropriate, the Commission shall be invited to participate as an observer in any such negotiations.

any relevant standard clauses, developed and laid down jointly between Member States and the Commission, are included in such negotiations; and

the notification procedure set out in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 is complied with.

2. Where a Member State intends to enter into such negotiations it shall notify the Commission of its intentions in writing. This notification shall include a copy of the existing agreement, if available, other relevant documentation and an indication of the provisions to be addressed in the negotiations, the objectives of the negotiations and any other relevant information. The Commission shall make the notification and, on request, the accompanying documentation, available to other Member States, subject to the requirements of confidentiality. The information shall be transmitted at least one calendar month before formal negotiations are scheduled to commence with the third country concerned. If, due to exceptional circumstances, formal negotiations are scheduled at less than one month's notice, the Member State shall transmit the information as soon as possible.

3. Member States may make comments to the Member State which has notified its intention to enter into negotiations in accordance with paragraph 2. That Member State shall take such comments into account as far as possible in the course of the negotiations.

4. If, within 15 working days of receipt of the notification referred to in paragraph 2, the Commission concludes that the negotiations are likely to: it shall inform the Member State accordingly.

undermine the objectives of Community negotiations underway with the third country concerned, and/or

lead to an agreement which is incompatible with Community law

Article 2 Consultation of stakeholders and participation in negotiations

Insofar as air carriers and other interested parties are to be involved in the negotiations referred to in Article 1, Member States shall treat equally all Community air carriers with an establishment on their respective territories to which the Treaty applies.

Article 3 Prohibition on introducing more restrictive arrangements

A Member State shall not enter into any new arrangement with a third country, which reduces the number of Community air carriers which may, in accordance with existing arrangements, be designated to provide services between its territory and that country, neither in respect of the entire air transport market between the two parties nor on the basis of specific city pairs.

Article 4 Conclusion of agreements

1. Upon signature of an agreement, the Member State concerned shall notify the Commission of the outcome of the negotiations together with any relevant documentation.

2. Where the negotiations have resulted in an agreement which incorporates the relevant standard clauses referred to in Article 1(1), the Member State shall be authorised to conclude the agreement.

3. Where the negotiations have resulted in an agreement which does not incorporate the relevant standard clauses referred to in Article 1(1), the Member State shall be authorised, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 7(2), to conclude the agreement, provided that this does not harm the object and purpose of the Community common transport policy. The Member State may provisionally apply the agreement pending the outcome of this procedure.

4. Notwithstanding paragraphs 2 and 3, if the Commission is actively negotiating with the same third country on the basis of a country-specific mandate or on the basis of Council Decision 2004/.../EC of... authorising the Commission to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements with a Community agreement, the Member State concerned may be authorised, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 7(2), to apply provisionally and/or conclude the agreement.

Article 5 Distribution of traffic rights

Where a Member State concludes an agreement, or amendments to an agreement or its Annexes, that provide for limitations on the use of traffic rights or the number of Community air carriers eligible to be designated to take advantage of traffic rights, that Member State shall ensure a distribution of traffic rights among eligible Community air carriers on the basis of a non-discriminatory and transparent procedure.

Article 6 Publication of procedures

Member States shall inform the Commission without delay of the procedures that they shall apply for the purposes of Article 5 and, where appropriate, Article 2. For information purposes, the Commission shall ensure that these procedures are published in the Official Journal of the European Union within eight weeks of their receipt. Any new procedures and subsequent changes to existing procedures shall be communicated to the Commission at least eight weeks before they enter into force, so that the Commission can ensure their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union within that eight-week period.

Article 7 Committee procedure

1. The Commission shall be assisted by the committee established under Article 11 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes.

2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 3 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.

3. The Committee shall adopt its rules of procedure.

Article 8 Confidentiality

In notifying the Commission of negotiations and their outcome as envisaged in Articles 1 and 4, Member States shall clearly inform the Commission if any information therein is to be considered confidential and whether it can be shared with other Member States. The Commission and Member States shall ensure that any information identified as confidential is treated according to Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents.

Article 9 Gibraltar

1. The application of this Regulation to the airport of Gibraltar is understood to be without prejudice to the respective legal positions of the Kingdom of Spain and the United Kingdom with regard to the dispute over sovereignty over the territory in which the airport is situated.

2. Application of this Regulation to Gibraltar airport shall be suspended until the arrangements included in the Joint Declaration made by the Foreign Ministers of the Kingdom of Spain and the United Kingdom on 2 December 1987 enter into operation. The Governments of Spain and the United Kingdom will inform the Council of such date of entry into operation.

Article 10 Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the thirtieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Strasbourg, 29.4.2004. For the European Parliament The President P. Cox For the Council The President M. McDowell

Versions

1. 2004-04-29

Cited by

• Commission Regulation (EC) No 1459/2006 of 28 September 2006 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements and concerted practices concerning consultations on passenger tariffs on scheduled air services and slot allocation at airports Regulation · Grade B

  In contrast to intra-Community air-traffic, air services between Member States and third countries are, in general, governed by bilateral air services agreements. The nature and level of detail of regulatory requirements set out in these agreements vary widely. Without prejudice to Community law, including Regulation (EC) No 847/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the negotiation and implementation of air service agreements between Member States and third countries, it is common for air services agreements to restrict and/or regulate market access and/or pric

• Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 847/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the negotiation and implementation of air service agreements between Member States and third countries (Official Journal of the European Union L 157 of 30 April 2004) Corrigendum · Grade B

  Regulation (EC) No 847/2004 should read as follows:

• Commission Decision of 28 August 2009 on State aid C 6/09 (ex N 663/08) — Austria Austrian Airlines — Restructuring Plan (notified under document C(2009) 6686) (Only the German text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (2010/137/EC) Decision · Grade B

  The vast majority of bilateral air transport agreements with third countries already contain the Community designation clause, either through bilateral negotiations or by means of a horizontal agreement. In this regard, the Austrian authorities, aware of their obligations under Community law, have undertaken to terminate the agreements or renegotiate them in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 847/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the negotiation and implementation of air service agreements between Member States and third countries.

• Commission Decision of 28 August 2009 on State aid C 6/09 (ex N 663/08) — Austria Austrian Airlines — Restructuring Plan (notified under document C(2009) 6686) (Only the German text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (2010/137/EC) Decision · Grade B

  Austria shall terminate bilateral aviation agreements which do not contain the Community designation clause or renegotiate them in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 847/2004. Austria shall inform the Commission of measures taken to ensure the conformity of such agreements with Community law regarding the recognition of the Community designation.

• Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 18 March 2014 Judgment · Grade B

  Regulation (EC) No 847/2004

• Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 18 March 2014 Judgment · Grade B

  That is the case, inter alia, with Regulation No 261/2004, as is apparent from Article 3(1)(b) thereof, and with Regulation No 785/2004, as is apparent from Article 2(1) thereof. That is also the case with Regulation No 847/2004, which provides for cooperation between the Member States and the Commission in the process of negotiation and conclusion of air service agreements between Member States and third countries, where the subject-matter of those agreements falls partly within the competence of the European Union. In addition, a series of agreements on air transport services were negotiated

• Judgment Of The General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) 30 March 2022 Judgment · Grade B

  First, they submit that, as regards freight services, condemning conduct authorised by a third country under EU competition rules constitutes an infringement of the principle of legal certainty, Article 59 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969 and Article 351 TFEU, by disregarding the procedure laid down in Regulation (EC) No 847/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the negotiation and implementation of air service agreements between Member States and third countries (OJ 2004 L 157, p. 7).

• Judgment Of The General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) 30 March 2022 Judgment · Grade B

  Lastly, the applicants’ arguments alleging infringement of the principle of legal certainty, of Article 59 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969 and of Article 351 TFEU must be rejected. Those arguments are based on the premiss that the Commission disregarded the procedure laid down in Regulation No 847/2004. Yet the applicants have failed to explain why that procedure should have been applied or how the Commission failed to comply with it. Nor have they explained how the alleged failure to comply with that procedure infringes, in the present case, the principle of leg

• Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 24 April 2007 Judgment · Grade B

  The Kingdom of the Netherlands, supported by the French Government, argues that the Commission brought the present action without taking sufficient account of developments which took place after the reasoned opinion. On 5 June 2003, after the delivery of the judgments in the open skies cases, the Council of the European Union conferred two mandates upon the Commission to negotiate air transport agreements with the United States and other non-member States within the framework of Regulation (EC) No 847/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the negotiation and im

• Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 24 April 2007 Judgment · Grade B

  The Kingdom of the Netherlands further argues, supported by the French Government, that in the current proceedings the Commission has not taken into account either the two negotiating mandates conferred by the Council on the Commission in June 2003, or Regulation No 847/2004. Thus there was no assessment of the considerable damage which a termination of the bilateral agreements on air transport could cause to airlines.

• Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) 13 May 2015 Judgment · Grade B

  In that context, the European Parliament and the Council adopted Regulation No 847/2004 of 29 April 2004 on the negotiation and implementation of air service agreements between Member States and third countries (OJ 2004 L 157, p. 7). It follows from recital 6 in the preamble to that regulation that all bilateral agreements between Member States and third countries that contain provisions contrary to EU law should be amended or replaced by new agreements that are wholly compatible with EU law.

• Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) 13 May 2015 Judgment · Grade B

  The operative part of the contested decision reads as follows: Article 1 Subject to the conditions set out in Article 2, the restructuring aid granted by Austria in favour of Austrian Airlines is deemed compatible with the common market by virtue of Article 87(3)(c) [EC], provided that the restructuring plan notified to the Commission is implemented in full. Article 21. Austria shall take the necessary measures to ensure that Austrian Airlines reduces its overall capacity in terms of available seat kilometres (ASK) by 15% of its January 2010 level by the end of 2008. Thereafter, Austrian Airli

• Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) 13 May 2015 Judgment · Grade B

  In that regard, it is important to observe that in the contested decision the Commission required the Republic of Austria to terminate such agreements or to renegotiate them, in accordance with Regulation No 847/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the negotiation and implementation of air service agreements between Member States and third countries (OJ 2004 L 157, p. 7). The Republic of Austria is also required, according to Article 2 of the contested decision, to inform the Commission of the steps which it has taken to ensure the conformity of such agreement

• Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 30 April 2013 Case C‑628/11 Criminal proceedings against International Jet Management GmbH (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Braunschweig (Germany)) Opinion · Grade B

  Regulation (EC) No 847/2004

• Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 30 April 2013 Case C‑628/11 Criminal proceedings against International Jet Management GmbH (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Braunschweig (Germany)) Opinion · Grade B

  Finally, and without being exhaustive, European Union legislation in this field being abundant, it must be observed that, following the Open Skies judgments, the European Union legislature adopted Regulation No 847/2004 to establish a procedure for cooperation between the Member States and the European Commission when the Member States decide to enter into agreements concerning aviation services between the Member States and third countries and where it becomes apparent that the subject-matter of the agreement in question falls partly within the competence of the European Union and partly with

• Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 16 November 2006 Opinion · Grade B

  The last measure was followed by the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 847/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the negotiation and implementation of air service agreements between Member States and third countries. Among the objectives pursued by that regulation, the 16th recital in its preamble refers specifically to the coordination of negotiations with third countries with a view to concluding air service agreements, the necessity to guarantee a harmonised approach in the implementation and application of those agreements and the verification of their complia

• Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 16 November 2006 Opinion · Grade B

  Third, the Netherlands Government contends that the application is also inadmissible by virtue of the fact that the Commission took no account of developments between the Courts judgments of 5 November 2002 and, in particular, the grant to the Commission of a mandate to negotiate international air transport agreements with non-member countries and with the United States of America at the above-mentioned Council meeting of 5 and 6 June 2003, the adoption of Regulation No 847/2004 and, more generally, the definition of the Community objectives in the air traffic sector, in pursuit of which the N

• National procedure for allocating limited traffic rights in Finland C/2026/553 Notice · Grade B

  Pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 847/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the negotiation and implementation of air service agreements between Member States and third countries, the Commission will publish the national procedure applied by Finland for allocating traffic rights which are limited by virtue of air service agreements concluded with third countries between eligible Union carriers. Issued: 14.11.2025 Enters into force: 2.1.2026 Validity: until further notice Legal basis: Act on Transport Services (320/2017), Section 124 Regulation (EC) No

• French national procedure for the allocation of limited air traffic rights (2006/C 242/11) Notice · Grade B

  Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 847/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the negotiation and implementation of air service agreements between Member States and third countries;

• Greek national procedure for the allocation of limited air traffic rights (2007/C 278/03) Notice · Grade B

  The provisions of Regulation (EC) No 847/2004 of 29 April 2004 on the negotiation and implementation of air service agreements between Member States and third countries, and in particular Articles 5 and 6 thereof.