Commission Regulation (EC) No 180/2006 of 1 February 2006 setting delivery obligations for cane sugar to be imported under the ACP Protocol and the Agreement with India for the 2005/06 delivery period and derogating from Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003
Grade B
mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.
Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/regulation/2006/180@2006-02-01/en
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector, and in particular Article 39(6) thereof,
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 of 30 June 2003 laying down detailed rules of application for the 2003/04, 2004/05 and 2005/06 marketing years for the import of cane sugar under certain tariff quotas and preferential agreements and amending Regulations (EC) No 1464/95 and (EC) No 779/96, and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 lays down detailed rules for setting delivery obligations at zero duty for products falling within CN code 1701, expressed in white-sugar equivalent, for imports originating in the countries that are signatories to the ACP Protocol and to the Agreement with India.
(2) Application of Articles 3 and 7 of the ACP Protocol, Articles 3 and 7 of the Agreement with India and Article 9(3) and Articles 11 and 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 has resulted in the Commission setting delivery obligations for each exporting country for the 2005/06 delivery period, on the basis of the information currently available.
(3) Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 provides that paragraph 1 of that Article does not apply where the difference between the quantity of delivery obligations and the total quantity of ACP-India preferential sugar counted is 5 % or less than the delivery obligations. In the case of Côte d’Ivoire, India and Madagascar, the quantities delivered are 6,7 %, 7,6 % and 6,7 % respectively below the delivery obligations. Given that the quantities concerned are minimal and the impact on the Community sugar market and the supply of raw sugar to Community refineries for that delivery period was negligible, Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 should not be applied to India, Côte d’Ivoire or Madagascar and the quantities not delivered should be added to the delivery obligations for those countries for the 2005/06 delivery period, in accordance with Article 12(4) of that Regulation.
(4) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 notwithstanding, paragraph 1 of that Article shall not apply as regards the quantities registered as not delivered for the 2004/05 delivery period in the case of Côte d’Ivoire, India and Madagascar. The quantities not delivered referred to in paragraph 1 shall be added to the delivery obligations referred to in Article 2.
Article 2
The delivery obligations for imports originating in the countries that are signatories to the ACP Protocol and to the Agreement with India in respect of products falling within CN code 1701, expressed in white-sugar equivalent, in the 2005/06 delivery period for each exporting country concerned, shall be as set out in the Annex.
Article 3
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, 1 February 2006. For the Commission Mariann Fischer Boel Member of the Commission
ANNEX
ANNEX
Delivery obligations for imports of preferential sugar originating in countries which are signatories to the ACP Protocol and to the Agreement with India for the 2005/06 delivery period, expressed in white-sugar equivalent. ACP Protocol/Agreement with India signatory country Delivery obligations 2005/06 Barbados 32638,29 Belize 40306,70 Congo 10225,97 Côte d’Ivoire 10772,81 Fiji 165305,43 Guyana 159259,91 India 10781,10 Jamaica 118851,82 Kenya 5050,48 Madagascar 14217,02 Malawi 20993,62 Mauritius 493856,36 Mozambique 6018,62 Saint Kitts and Nevis 15689,30 Suriname 0,00 Swaziland 116631,85 Tanzania 10298,66 Trinidad and Tobago 47717,60 Uganda 0,00 Zambia 7086,65 Zimbabwe 30262,59 Total 1315964,78
Versions
Cited by
- Commission Regulation (EC) No 222/2006 of 8 February 2006 on granting of import licences for cane sugar for the purposes of certain tariff quotas and preferential agreements Regulation · Grade B
Commission Regulation (EC) No 180/2006 of 1 February 2006 fixing the quantities of the delivery obligations for sugar cane to be imported under the ACP Protocol and the India Agreement for the 2005/06 delivery period fixed a delivery obligation for Congo, India, Mozambique, Tanzania and Zimbabwe higher than all the import licence applications submitted to date for the 2005/06 delivery period.
- Commission Regulation (EC) No 493/2006 of 27 March 2006 laying down transitional measures within the framework of the reform of the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector, and amending Regulations (EC) No 1265/2001 and (EC) No 314/2002 Regulation · Grade B
In order to comply with the marketing conditions for the 2005/2006 marketing year, it should be laid down that the aid for disposal and additional aid for sugar produced in certain regions of the Community in the 2005/2006 marketing year and, within the limits of the quantities set by Commission Regulation (EC) No 180/2006 of 1 February 2006, the refining aid for certain preferential sugars imported and refined in the 2005/2006 delivery period may continue to be paid beyond 30 June 2006. To this end, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1554/2001 of 30 July 2001 laying down detailed rules for the app
- Commission Regulation (EC) No 493/2006 of 27 March 2006 laying down transitional measures within the framework of the reform of the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector, and amending Regulations (EC) No 1265/2001 and (EC) No 314/2002 Regulation · Grade B
Adjustment aid shall be granted to the industry refining preferential raw cane sugar imported under Protocol 3 on ACP sugar attached to Annex IV to the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000, and refined in the 2005/2006 delivery period between 1 July 2006 and 30 September 2006. This aid shall be paid to refineries. It shall apply to the quantities referred to in Regulation (EC) No 180/2006 and not refined by 1 July 2006, as a replacement for the aid referred to in Article 38(1), (2) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.
- Commission Regulation (EC) No 863/2006 of 13 June 2006 adjusting the delivery obligations for cane sugar to be imported under the ACP Protocol and the Agreement with India for the 2005/06 delivery period Regulation · Grade B
These quantities were set, for the 2005/06 delivery period, by Commission Regulation (EC) No 180/2006.
- Commission Regulation (EC) No 863/2006 of 13 June 2006 adjusting the delivery obligations for cane sugar to be imported under the ACP Protocol and the Agreement with India for the 2005/06 delivery period Regulation · Grade B
Regulation (EC) No 180/2006 should therefore be repealed, and the delivery obligations for the 2005/06 delivery period should be adjusted in accordance with Article 9(1) and (2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003.
- Commission Regulation (EC) No 863/2006 of 13 June 2006 adjusting the delivery obligations for cane sugar to be imported under the ACP Protocol and the Agreement with India for the 2005/06 delivery period Regulation · Grade B
The delivery obligations for imports originating in the countries that are signatories to the ACP Protocol and to the Agreement with India in respect of products falling within CN code 1701, expressed in white-sugar equivalent, in the 2005/06 delivery period for each exporting country concerned, set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 180/2006, are hereby adjusted as shown in the Annex to this Regulation.
- Commission Regulation (EC) No 863/2006 of 13 June 2006 adjusting the delivery obligations for cane sugar to be imported under the ACP Protocol and the Agreement with India for the 2005/06 delivery period Regulation · Grade B
Regulation (EC) No 180/2006 is hereby repealed.