Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 of 14 July 2016 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council by identifying high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies (Text with EEA relevance)
Grade B
mapped from publisher markup. A grade says how a document's structure was obtained, not how reliable the law is.
Address https://gelex.eu/eli/EU/regulation/2016/1675@2016-07-14/en
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC, and in particular Article 9(2) thereof,
Whereas:
(1) The Union must ensure efficient protection mechanisms for the whole of the internal market, with a view to increase legal certainty for economic operators and stakeholders in general in their relationships with third-country jurisdictions. The integrity of financial markets and the proper functioning of the internal market as a whole are seriously threatened by jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies in their national anti-money-laundering and terrorism-financing frameworks. Those jurisdictions that have in place deficient legal and institutional frameworks with poor standards for controlling money flows pose significant threats to the financial system of the Union.
(2) All Union obliged entities under Directive (EU) 2015/849 should apply enhanced due diligence measures in their relationship to natural persons or legal entities established in high-risk third countries, thereby ensuring equivalent requirements for market participants across the Union.
(3) Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2015/849 lays down the criteria on which the Commission's assessment is to be based and empowers the Commission to identify high-risk third countries taking into account those criteria.
(4) The identification of high-risk third countries must be based on a clear and objective assessment which focuses on a jurisdiction's compliance with the criteria laid down in Directive (EU) 2015/849 regarding its legal and institutional anti-money-laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) framework, the powers and procedures of its competent authorities for the purposes of combating money laundering and terrorist financing and the effectiveness of the anti-money-laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) system in addressing money laundering or terrorist financing risks of the third country.
(5) All findings upon which the Commission's decision to include a jurisdiction in the list of high-risk third countries is to be based should be documented by robust, verifiable and up-to-date information.
(6) It is essential that the Commission fully acknowledges relevant work already undertaken at international level for identifying high-risk third countries, in particular that of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). With a view to ensuring the integrity of the global financial system, it is of the highest importance that the list of third countries laid down at Union level is closely aligned, as appropriate, with those lists agreed internationally. By promoting a global approach at international level, the Union contributes to enhancing the financial integrity worldwide and better protecting the international financial system from high-risk countries. Such a global approach serves to achieve equivalent conditions for obliged entities and avoid any disruptive effect on the international financial system.
(7) In line with the criteria set out in Directive (EU) 2015/849, the Commission took into account all available expert assessments of factors that contribute to making a country or jurisdiction particularly vulnerable to money laundering, terrorist financing or other illicit financial activity. In particular, the Commission took into account, as appropriate, the most recent FATF Public Statement, FATF documents (Improving Global AML/CFT Compliance: ongoing process), FATF reports on International Cooperation Review, and the mutual evaluations report carried out by FATF and FATF-Style Regional Bodies in relation to the risks posed by individual third countries in line with Article 9(4) of Directive (EU) 2015/849.
(8) Considering the high level of integration of the international financial system, the close connection of market operators, the high volume of cross-border transactions to/from the EU, as well as the degree of market opening, it is hence considered that any AML/CFT threat posed to the international financial system also represents a threat for the EU financial system.
(9) In accordance with the latest relevant information, the Commission's analysis has concluded that Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Guyana, Iraq, Lao PDR, Syria, Uganda, Vanuatu and Yemen should be considered third-country jurisdictions which have strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT regimes that pose significant threats to the financial system of the Union. Those countries have provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and have developed an action plan with FATF, which would allow the requirements laid down in Directive (EU) 2015/849 to be met.
(10) In accordance with the latest relevant information, the Commission's analysis has similarly concluded that Iran should be considered a third-country jurisdiction which has strategic deficiencies in its AML/CFT regimes that pose significant threats to the financial system of the Union. This country, identified by FATF Public Statement, has provided a high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies, and has decided to seek technical assistance in the implementation of the FATF Action Plan which would allow the requirements laid down in Directive (EU) 2015/849 to be met.
(11) In accordance with the latest relevant information, the Commission's analysis has similarly concluded that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) should be considered third-country jurisdiction which has strategic deficiencies in its AML/CFT regime that pose significant threats to the financial system of the Union. This country, identified by FATF Public Statement, presents ongoing and substantial money-laundering and terrorist-financing risks, having repeatedly failed to address the identified deficiencies.
(12) It is essential that the Commission extends an invitation to third-country jurisdictions identified as high-risk to fully cooperate with the Commission and international bodies with a view to agreeing and effectively implementing measures for correcting the strategic deficiencies in their anti-money laundering and terrorism financing regimes.
(13) It is of the utmost importance that the Commission conducts a permanent monitoring of developments in the assessment of legal and institutional frameworks in place in third countries, the powers and procedures of competent authorities, and the effectiveness of their AML/CFT regimes with a view to updating the list of high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
The list of third-country jurisdictions which have strategic deficiencies in their anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism regimes that pose significant threats to the financial system of the Union (high-risk third countries) is laid down in the Annex.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties. Done at Brussels, 14 July 2016. For the Commission The President Jean-Claude Juncker
ANNEX
ANNEX High-risk third countries
I.
High-risk third countries which have provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and have developed an action plan with FATF. No High-risk third country 1 Afghanistan 2 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 Guyana 4 Iraq 5 Lao PDR 6 Syria 7 Uganda 8 Vanuatu 9 Yemen
II.
High-risk third countries which have provided a high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies, and have decided to seek technical assistance in the implementation of the FATF Action Plan, which are identified by FATF Public Statement. No High-risk third country 1 Iran
III.
High-risk third countries which present ongoing and substantial money-laundering and terrorist-financing risks, having repeatedly failed to address the identified deficiencies and which are identified by FATF Public Statement. No High-risk third country 1 Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK)
Versions
Cited by
- Commission Decision (EU) 2021/146 of 5 February 2021 amending the Annex to the Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra Decision · Grade B
Legal Provisions to be implemented Deadline for implementing Prevention of money laundering 1 Council Decision 2000/642/JHA of 17 October 2000 concerning arrangements for cooperation between financial intelligence units of the Member States in respect of exchanging information (OJ L 271, 24.10.2000, p. 4) 2 Council Framework Decision 2001/500/JHA of 26 June 2001 on money laundering, the identification, tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscation of instrumentalities and the proceeds of crime (OJ L 182, 5.7.2001, p. 1) 3 Council Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February 2005 on Confiscatio
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/37 of 7 December 2020 on amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards deleting Mongolia from the table in point I of the Annex (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 identifies high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies. This Regulation should be reviewed where appropriate in light of the progress made by those high-risk third countries in removing the strategic deficiencies in their regime on anti-money laundering and countering terrorist financing. The Commission should take into account in its assessments new information from international organisations and standard setters, such as those issued by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/37 of 7 December 2020 on amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards deleting Mongolia from the table in point I of the Annex (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
It is of the utmost importance that the Commission conducts a permanent monitoring of third countries and assesses developments in their legal and institutional frameworks, the powers and procedures of competent authorities, and the effectiveness of their AML/CFT regime, with a view to updating the Annex of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675.
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/37 of 7 December 2020 on amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards deleting Mongolia from the table in point I of the Annex (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 should therefore be amended accordingly,
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/37 of 7 December 2020 on amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 supplementing Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards deleting Mongolia from the table in point I of the Annex (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
In the Annex to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675, in the table under point I. High-risk third countries which have provided a written high-level political commitment to address the identified deficiencies and have developed an action plan with FATF, the following line is deleted: 10 Mongolia
- Regulation (EU) 2023/2631 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 November 2023 on European Green Bonds and optional disclosures for bonds marketed as environmentally sustainable and for sustainability-linked bonds (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
Third-country jurisdictions listed in Annex I to the Council conclusions on the revised EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes or high-risk countries listed in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675, and issuers established in those jurisdictions or countries, should not be authorised to use the designation European Green Bond or EuGB.
- Regulation (EU) 2023/2631 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 November 2023 on European Green Bonds and optional disclosures for bonds marketed as environmentally sustainable and for sustainability-linked bonds (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
The competent authorities referred to in Article 44(1) of this Regulation shall not approve a prospectus issued by a jurisdiction listed in Annex I to the Council conclusions on the revised EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes, by a high-risk country listed in the Annex to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675, or by issuers established in those jurisdictions or countries, where that prospectus refers to this Regulation or to the designation European Green Bond or EuGB.
- Council Directive (EU) 2025/50 of 10 December 2024 on faster and safer relief of excess withholding taxes Directive · Grade B
collective investment undertaking means a UCITS, an EU AIF or an alternative investment fund managed by an EU AIFM, or any other collective investment vehicle that, based on the national rules of the source Member State or on a double tax treaty, is entitled to relief of excess withholding tax, or a collective investment vehicle of which the underlying investors are entitled to such relief that can be requested on their behalf, except such collective investment vehicles that are, or whose manager or depositary is, established in a third country listed in Annex I to the Council conclusions on t
- Council Directive (EU) 2025/50 of 10 December 2024 on faster and safer relief of excess withholding taxes Directive · Grade B
it is resident for tax purposes in a Member State or a third-country jurisdiction not included in Annex I to the Council conclusions on the revised EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes or in Table I of the Annex to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675;
- Council Directive (EU) 2025/50 of 10 December 2024 on faster and safer relief of excess withholding taxes Directive · Grade B
a declaration of compliance with the provisions of Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council or with comparable rules of a third-country jurisdiction not included in Annex I to the Council conclusions on the revised EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes or in Table I of the Annex to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675.
- Commission Decision (EU) 2023/391 of 15 February 2023 amending the Annex to the Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of San Marino Decision · Grade B
Legal Provisions to be implemented Deadline for implementing Prevention of money laundering 1 Council Decision 2000/642/JHA of 17 October 2000 concerning arrangements for cooperation between financial intelligence units of the Member States in respect of exchanging information (OJ L 271, 24.10.2000, p. 4). 1 September 2013 2 Council Framework Decision 2001/500/JHA of 26 June 2001 on money laundering, the identification, tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscation of instrumentalities and the proceeds of crime (OJ L 182, 5.7.2001, p. 1). 3 Council Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1219 of 17 May 2023 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 as regards adding Nigeria and South Africa to the table in point I of the Annex and deleting Cambodia and Morocco from that table (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 identifies high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies.
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1219 of 17 May 2023 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 as regards adding Nigeria and South Africa to the table in point I of the Annex and deleting Cambodia and Morocco from that table (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
Since the latest amendments to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675, the FATF has updated its list of Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring. At its plenary meeting in February 2023, the FATF added Nigeria and South Africa to that list and deleted Cambodia and Morocco from that list. Given those changes, the Commission has conducted an assessment for the identification of high-risk third countries in accordance with Article 9 of Directive (EU) 2015/849.
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1219 of 17 May 2023 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 as regards adding Nigeria and South Africa to the table in point I of the Annex and deleting Cambodia and Morocco from that table (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
The Commission’s assessment therefore concludes that Nigeria and South Africa should be considered as third-country jurisdictions which have strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT regimes that pose significant threats to the financial system of the EU. Nigeria and South Africa should therefore be added to the table in point I of the Annex to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675.
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1219 of 17 May 2023 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 as regards adding Nigeria and South Africa to the table in point I of the Annex and deleting Cambodia and Morocco from that table (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
The Commission has reviewed the progress in addressing the strategic deficiencies of Cambodia and Morocco. These are countries listed in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 but deleted from the FATF list of Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring in February 2023.
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1219 of 17 May 2023 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 as regards adding Nigeria and South Africa to the table in point I of the Annex and deleting Cambodia and Morocco from that table (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
As Cambodia and Morocco have strengthened the effectiveness of their AML/CFT regimes and addressed technical deficiencies to meet the commitments in their action plans on the strategic deficiencies identified by the FATF, the Commission’s assessment of the available information leads it to conclude that Cambodia and Morocco no longer have strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT regimes. It is therefore appropriate to delete Cambodia and Morocco from the table in point I of the Annex to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675.
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1219 of 17 May 2023 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 as regards adding Nigeria and South Africa to the table in point I of the Annex and deleting Cambodia and Morocco from that table (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 should therefore be amended accordingly,
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1219 of 17 May 2023 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 as regards adding Nigeria and South Africa to the table in point I of the Annex and deleting Cambodia and Morocco from that table (Text with EEA relevance) Regulation · Grade B
In the Annex to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675, in point I, the table is replaced by the table in the Annex to this Regulation.
- Commission Decision (EU) 2025/918 of 20 May 2025 amending the Annex to the Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of San Marino Decision · Grade B
Legal Provisions to be implemented Deadline for implementing Prevention of money laundering 1 Council Decision 2000/642/JHA of 17 October 2000 concerning arrangements for cooperation between financial intelligence units of the Member States in respect of exchanging information (OJ L 271, 24.10.2000, p. 4) 1 September 2013 2 Council Framework Decision 2001/500/JHA of 26 June 2001 on money laundering, the identification, tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscation of instrumentalities and the proceeds of crime (OJ L 182, 5.7.2001, p. 1) 3 Council Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February 20
- Commission Decision (EU) 2019/511 of 26 March 2019 amending the Annex to the Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Vatican City State Decision · Grade B
LEGAL PROVISIONS TO BE IMPLEMENTED DEADLINE FOR IMPLEMENTING Prevention of money laundering 1 Council Framework Decision 2001/500/JHA of 26 June 2001 on money laundering, the identification, tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscation of instrumentalities and the proceeds of crime (OJ L 182, 5.7.2001, p. 1) 2 Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on controls of cash entering or leaving the Community (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p. 9) 3 Directive 2014/42/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the freezing and confisc